• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

FRED WILLIAMS ON WILK

Y

yonkstur

Guest
Entercom's Shadoe Steele interviewed Fred Williams today at noon on their weekend public service/talk block. For those of you not familiar with this noon program, it is a step above any public service type shows that interview social service officials about alcohol, battered women, too many pets, poison control for the elderly or interviews about small children locking themselelves in fridges. While all of these issues are important, and need promotion and light of day shone on them, a public affairs show can fall into a familiar, path of least resistance trap. I know, I did that at WBAX for 7 years. It was way easier to have a Carmen Ambrosino on to talk about alcholism and just turn on the tape, let him expound and before you knew it, I had a show in the can. WILK has broken that mold tackling interesting issues and personalities. This week, it was Fred Williams.
And even though I have busted this topic on my blog, phttp://lulacpoliticaletter.blogspot.com,
as well as on the WILK Sports Show, I need to tell you the program with Williams was interesting and informative. More importantly, when you heard the outtakes and Williams speaking to Shadoe Steele, your memory, at least mine went back to the many battles, rational or otherwise this man fought. His show was the most loved and hated thing in the Valley but people listened. I disagreed vehemently with Williams on the Arena, his handling of issues that he seemed to exploit as well as his cronyism with certain politicians, maybe favoritism is a better word that used his show as their own personal political launching pad. I was also in the crosshairs for attacks from Williams. At one point he shared details of a job interview I had with his station manager. So I had no love for his tactics. However, as a fan of broadcasting, an onlooker, a listener, you had to love the guy. His ratings were always at the top, WILK was a hybrid station when he came on board, not quite sure of its footing and in need of a franchise player. Fred Williams was that player who hit the ball out of the park many times for WILK.
To call him a trendsetter for local talk radio is an overestimation. Others paved the way but Williams expanded the limits to how far talk could go. I'd call him a bridge into the big time radio controversial shows that other major markets were listening to long before he hit our area.
The program is one every radio freak should hear. I understand it will be rebroadcast on WILK next Sunday at 9AM. He seems to have mellowed, but just a bit. You'll see what I mean when you tune in for a little "of the good stuff".
Yonkstur
P.S. Future shows will have an interview with Harry West.
 
Haven't heard the show, and no disrpespect to the host or Mr. Vopper. That being said, to make this sort of thing interesting it's imperative you have 1) A good listener who is a good talker, which means someone who knows how to ask the right questions and not let up until they are answered. Which, BTW, doesn't mean you have to be an attack dog. 2) Thorough research. You need to have it all right in front of you, because without it, you don't necessarily know what those right questions are.

I can think of maybe three hosts/interviewers in this market capable of making this thing compelling and worthy of attention. One is a "news" person, one isn't, and the other is iffy.
 
I can think of maybe three hosts/interviewers in this market capable of making this thing compelling and worthy of attention. One is a "news" person, one isn't, and the other is iffy.

CARE TO SHARE????

Yonkstur
 
yonkstur said:
I can think of maybe three hosts/interviewers in this market capable of making this thing compelling and worthy of attention. One is a "news" person, one isn't, and the other is iffy.

CARE TO SHARE????

Yonkstur

Hmmmm, I'm not so sure that would be a great idea. As you've likely noticed, I am opinionated, mainly because I am a very strong believer in the old saying that, "...the unexamined life isn't worth living." That aside, I'm not really interested in hurting anyone's feelings...
 
Hay... This is only a message board; it's not Jesus separating the sheep from the goats. Besides, the Vop wouldn't mind hurting other people.
 
Besides, the Vop wouldn't mind hurting other people.

Yeah, but I ain't the Vop. And what's this about goats? Never heard the man referred to as The Good Goatherd. Never heard of a Church of The Good Goatherd. No disrespect, of course. How 'bout you, and others interested, toss out a few names and we'll see if there is any agreement? I'll seed the discussion with one name; Ron Allen. Ron could've done it.
 
And what's this about goats? Never heard the man referred to as The Good Goatherd. Never heard of a Church of The Good Goatherd.
For non-Christians who have never read the Gospel, it's an end-of-the-world judgement story. For Christians who have never read the Gospel, get your @ to church.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom