• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Future of MLB on Broadcast TV

Since traditionally we won't know who will broadcast the big MLB events

(Game of the week, All Star Game, Divison Series, LCS, and World Series)

I've been thinking about it:

NBC is currently in discussions as it has been rumored (Broadcasting and Cable or Mediaweek.com) that FOX might give up either some or all of its MLB holdings.

Let's look back at the history of MLB on TV a little bit with the big four.

(Source: en.wikipedia.org)

1. NBC has a rich history of MLB.

It was the Baseball Network (Not to punn on the short lived joint venue with

ABC and MLB) between 1947 to 1989.

I felt the 6 year period where they had mostly postseason action didn't

do the peacock justice. I'm certain that NBC should at least have a share

of the regular season and some of the playoffs considering that they will

lose NASCAR after this year. Then NBC will go back to the glory years of sports

in the 1980's and 1990's (NBA in the 1990's as well).

2. CBS aired a game of the week for 10 years (1955-65). And had a popular

trio of announcers: Pee Wee Reese, Curt Gowdy, and Mel Allen. Now I'll admit

the 1990-93 period was arguably the worst ever for MLB TV.

Between erupting the All Star Game for a political convention, as if the cast of

60 Minutes needed more air time, to firing Brent Musgenberger, on April Fools

Day 1990 no less, firing Jack Buck in December 1991, pre-empting another game

due to a rain delay (On that day CBS aired William Shatner hosted Rescue 911,

And the fact that CBS had two of the lowest rated World Series at that time

(Canada doesen't have a Nielsen Ratings so I'm not dissing on The Toronto Blue Jays because they deserved to be World Champions).

I'm certain if they had the room on their busy schedule they would look to

acquire CERTAIN portions of the rights. But they're not in discussion as we

speak so I leave that for open debate.

3. ABC was the one that got the Game of The Week going in 1953.
(They eventually tried again in 1965)

There main legacy was Monday Night Baseball. (1976-88; Moved to Thursdays in 1989)

A great concept at its time. Imagine watching MLB and NFL in the 1970's

on ABC. It must have been a sports fan's dream at that time.

They also got the ball rolling in the playoffs including the 1977 World

Series where Reggie Jackson hit three straight home runs.

They also had the infamous 1989 World Series where the Earthquake hit

before the start of one of the games in the World Series that year.

With the recent loss of Monday Night Football, it wouldn't suprise me

that they would try to get the rights again since their last game to date

was a 1995 World Series game between the Atlanta Braves and Cleveland Indians.

4. FOX for the most part has been a great carrier of MLB. The only problem

is that they on occassion pause before a pitch leaving a few seconds of dead

air. (It wasn't Joe Buck, it happend with Thom Brennan as well in the NLCS last

year) Personally at some point Joe Buck and Tim McCarver will have to split.

It's clear the public is mixed and trust me, John Cena learned the hard way

when you have mixed reactions. They will seriously make some moves to

keep either all or some of their properities. I wish they gave some of it

to either NBC or ABC so they won't be stressed out.

And I want to see new episodes of Family Guy and House as well.
 
Does anyone like Fox's coverage?
Hopefully if NBC gets the deal they will not hire Tim McCarver, who is a stupid baboon.
 
> Does anyone like Fox's coverage?
> Hopefully if NBC gets the deal they will not hire Tim
> McCarver, who is a stupid baboon.
>

I don't like McCarver either. Please bring MLB back to NBC!<P ID="signature">______________
#13 Dan Marino...2005 Football Hall Of Fame Inductee :)</P>
 
My biggest problem with Fox's coverage is that their version of HD (720p) seems flat compared to the other networks. Before they finally went to HD for live sports events last year, the "Enhanced Broadcasts" in 420p were awful. The camera constantly froze or the picture was jittery. CBS has the best HD presentation but would be the worst place for MLB.

Times have changed - I was a Monday Night Baseball watcher back in the late 70s/early 80s, but now I can get games any day/night of the week between the Red Sox, ESPN, TBS and the Extra Innings package on cable. Because of the sheer # of games (unlike the NFL and NASCAR) MLB will never be appointment viewing for a network audience outside of the World Series.
 
I personally think that after the expiration of Fox's contract with Major Lague Baseball after the upcoming 2006 season, there will be much less of it on broadcast-network television.

I think there's a chance ESPN will grab what heretofore has been the broadcast-network MLB package. Under this scenario, I would expect ESPN to sell-off rights to between eight and eleven post-season games (two first-round playoff games, both on weekend afternoons; one game each of the American and National League championships, likewise on weekend afternoons; and the World Series) to a broadcast network. The Saturday "Game Of The Week" package (if it even continues), the All-Star Game, all but a couple of games of the first round of the playoffs and all but one game each of the ALCS and NLCS would become ESPN exclusives.

Although ESPN and ABC are under the same ownership, I don't think ABC will be involved in baseball since their weekend afternoons are full with college football and (starting in 2007) NASCAR. And I don't think ABC will want to pre-empt "Desperate Housewives" twice during the November sweeps for the World Series. I say "during the November sweeps" because I suspect that starting in 2007, the postseason will be pushed back by a week to a week-and-a-half to insure that the World Series gets played at the beginning of the November sweeps.

I personally think Fox will hang onto the MLB broadcast-network package, however many games or however few games that package may consist of. But starting in 2007, I suspect the only Major League Baseball coverage on broadcast television will be postseason games, possibly the limited postseason schedule outlines above.
 
NBC might want MLB, if the price is right. This is how they got NFL Sunday and the NHL becasue the price was right. But I don't have a problem with FOX staying with MLB. I would just like to see the ALCS/NLCS Playoffs and World Series on a different network each year, maybe between NBC and FOX. Also could their ever be a nigth

NBC might want to get the MLB Saturday Package if the price is right. As this is how they got the Sunday Night NFL and the NHL because the price was what they wanted. But I don't have a problem with FOX keeping MLB which they might do, the problem I have is seeing FOX have the ALCS/NLCS Playoffs and World Series each year. They should split that up between two networks like NBC and FOX. Maybe MLB could bring in a Saturday Night Primetime game and NBC could pick that up. Anyway to see baseball on NBC.

What about CBS or ABC are they looking into maybe wanting baseball?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom