K-Tel said:A license challenge because you don't like the format is rather silly.
Nah, I don't mind the format; people like CHR, even a soulless automaton like this. Besides, I've got my own format to push.
A note on my history on this subject, for those similarly inclined to knee-jerk dismissals: I'm a former FM106.3 staffer (that's 1985-1992 for you young'uns,) and for the majority of 106.3MHz's time as "G", I liked the format a whole lot less. It took me a while to settle to the opinion that, as a business, they're free to do what businesses do. Still, a license challenge threat would have indeed been silly, because they were at least fulfilling their mandate as a licensee - in fact, for a while, as badly as they were doing everything else, that was the thing they did best. As long as they were fulfilling the terms of their license, they could broadcast chronic flatulence in eight-part harmony and I'd have nothing to argue there.
I *do* mind, however, that they've got a tower in my area and it's no longer serving *me*, as a member of this community. Not the "alternative-rock-listening" community, the *community*. The format change, in this case, is just a nice catalyst for what really should be all-out rage at broadcasters who do this sort of thing in general.
For instance, earlier this winter, there was a massive blackout in most of Monmouth County. It took me a while to find a station that was covering it, and the first one I found that mentioned it on air was NJ 101.5 (albeit with tongue firmly in cheek except for the newsbreaks.) Which we then sat there in the dark and listened to until the lights came on, so good on them. G-Rock at least spent some time discussing it the next morning - which is good, because the transformer blowout that triggered the blackout was damn near in their backyard. Now there's zero likelihood of even that level of public service and, if station owners think they can continue to get away with this kind of stewardship, it'll only get worse.
I'd have more respect for it if it were the exact same format as it now is, but with local jocks. (Not much more respect, but it wouldn't warrant banging the drums for a license challenge.)
But they can't do that, can they? They can't afford the staff.
To my mind, that ought to be the rule - if you can't do radio 90% locally, you shouldn't be allowed to do it, no matter what inflated price you paid for the license. Sure, it's a business, and profits are paramount - but (again, to my mind) they should be secondary to the public trust. That's why there's such a thing as a "license" in the first place. If the public trust can't be satisfied profitably by one company, their license should be forfeited to someone who's willing to try.
-Sean
Altrok Radio at altrokradio.com