Sounds reasonable. But WCMF carries the Sabres in Rochester and since the Lake gets into Roch better than it gets into Buffalo... WGR could just as easily simulcast the Sabres on KB to fill in the Lancaster null. This also would blast the team all over "seventeen states and eastern Canada" as the promo once said. This might better appease the Sabres, but...SirRoxalot said:They don't need to move the Sabres broadcasts off WGR. They do need to simulcast on 107.7 to reach their audience at night. The 'GR pattern is very spotty in areas that The Lake services very well. Seems like a no-brainer - and I'd insist on it if I were the Sabres and trying to extend my audience regionally. The Lake's nighttime numbers are weak anyway.
ThePickleReport said:I heard a comment by new Sabres President Ted Black asking WGR (probably metaphorically) to "turn up their amps" to spread the gospel of the Sabres. Maybe the Sabres are also thinking they might find a better home for the Sabres on an FM? Say what you will about WGR's programming, but their sound quality is poor even for an AM, and the signal is spotty at night. I'd watch this situation closely next time the contract is up.Element9 said:If this doesn't force Entercom to simulcast WGR or WBEN on 107.7, nothing will.*
That's all I want. Some competent local sports talk. Competition is needed for that, compare Schopp from the 107.7 days to now, he doesn't even care or try anymore.SirRoxalot said:Let's look on the bright side. Maybe it'll force WGR to get off its collective duff and get a little better. I suggest that WGR lets Howard Simon do his own show with guests that actually know something about sports, puts Bulldog in Mid-days and see if he can recreate his WBEN sports days, and puts Jeremy White on with Schopp so we can watch both guys who are too smart for the room duke it out in public.
SirRoxalot said:They don't need to move the Sabres broadcasts off WGR. They do need to simulcast on 107.7 to reach their audience at night. The 'GR pattern is very spotty in areas that The Lake services very well. Seems like a no-brainer - and I'd insist on it if I were the Sabres and trying to extend my audience regionally. The Lake's nighttime numbers are weak anyway.
leelee said:That's all I want. Some competent local sports talk. Competition is needed for that, compare Schopp from the 107.7 days to now, he doesn't even care or try anymore.SirRoxalot said:Let's look on the bright side. Maybe it'll force WGR to get off its collective duff and get a little better. I suggest that WGR lets Howard Simon do his own show with guests that actually know something about sports, puts Bulldog in Mid-days and see if he can recreate his WBEN sports days, and puts Jeremy White on with Schopp so we can watch both guys who are too smart for the room duke it out in public.
WECK is a joke now, unfortunately. Every new ad specifically names and attacks WGR and WBEN, and the radio hosts that Brad Riter isn't friends with. It comes across as second-rate and so pathetic.
mediaboy said:I have seen this movie before, but in the original version " The Buffalo top 40 war" it was WYSL (1400) vs KB. Gordon McLendon had 1KW daytime and 250w nights to fight against 50kw. Mc Lendon had more money and more resources than Greene. McLendon also gathered more talent to 1400 than WECK could ever imagine seeing. Spoiler alert.............WYSL did a great job but failed to overtake 1520.
This WECK deal is a very poor attempt at a remake.
SirRoxalot said:Hey, if you guys continue to discuss WECK on this non-official thread, you risk invoking the wrath of "BRADonWECK". Do you really want war declared on YOU?
Element9 said:Wrath of WECK. You may have created a new feature for the thread or the station.
SirRoxalot said:Why on earth would Ried or Bauerle even acknowledge WECK? What's in it for them? WECK got a little press. If anybody who was a B&B listener sampled them, they sure didn't stay long. Love him or hate him, Bauerle's more entertaining than Bill O’Loughlin. Personally, I'm in the "none of the above", but neither station is going hold my attention for longer than a top of the hour newscast.
Is Riter going after Beach, or the Glummer Twins on 'GR? Even he doesn't appear to know the answer. Most of what I've heard from Riter is him bloviating about topics that interest HIM, and not necessarily the listeners. And why should I care what he thinks? What cred has he got? Are there credible guests willing to share their expertise?
WECKs best chance is to hire a real PD who might be able to rein in the inmates on Genesee Street and teach them how talk radio is really done. Know anybody with experience, a track record, is available at a reasonable price, and might be able to command enough respect to get the job done? The only name that comes to mind is Pastrick, but he'd have to be crazy to jump into this mess without some serious guarantees from Dick Greene. Even then, it might be too toxic to touch.
"Target #1". Heh. Heheh. Hahahahaha. THAT'S funny.
bbb said:I can care less what callers think about anything - last week somebody called in and said we should trade Connolly, Hecht, and Montadore for Jerome Iginla. Yeah, the Flames will surely take that one..........You want to listen to that nonsense, go right ahead.
SirRoxalot said:bbb said:I can care less what callers think about anything - last week somebody called in and said we should trade Connolly, Hecht, and Montadore for Jerome Iginla. Yeah, the Flames will surely take that one..........You want to listen to that nonsense, go right ahead.
The problem with Brad is that he rarely cares what anybody thinks except him. As I said, some actual experts, or at least a reference to source material, might give him some cred. Otherwise, he's just another loudmouth on the radio.