• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Garland so-called "loan" back in the news.

Loan still not repaid? I know WWL Management probably looks at this board from time to time. Come on! How have you not saved face? Innocent until proven guilty sure but any basic business ethics college course would explain why him taking a loan from anyone who could be involved in his on-air topics is WRONG. Period. No way around it.
WWL is losing credibility daily. Could you imagine if someone else in the media did a similar thing? Holier than thou Garland would have a field day crucifying. It's fishy Garland. It's fishy WW:. Just read what people are saying about you. Address it. You OWE it to the audience.

Look at these NOLA.com quotes!


"He really needs to be off the air, this is corruption plain and simple. WWL is embarrassing."

"Robinette is a fraud and probably should have been indicted along with the others involved in the scheme. WWL's actions are puzzling, to say the least."

"Shame on you, WWL Radio for keeping Garland on the air. Until you take him off, WWL Radio is not going to be heard by me. His behavior is worst than a politician. WWL you allowed him to use your airways to blast a business when he was taking $250,000 loans (not paid back as of yet) from the competitor. And, WWL Radio Management, you don't see a problem with that?"


I can't believe they took no actions in regards. Is WWL ever going to address this issue? Is Garland ever going to discuss it? The explanation he gave was a total cop-out.
For all his moral chest banging it just seems wrong Mr. Robinette and you better understand why it seems wrong to your public.

I know they will never address it again which makes me resent them even more. I have never worked there and I was never fired from there and I like most of their hosts but this is pathetic and I cannot believe how more people do not have a problem with this.

Thoughts? Does anyone have thoughts on this?????
 
WWL is actively promoting him in tv commercial ads along with the other daytime hosts so that should tell you what they think....
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom