• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Genisis Broadcasting Company

M

MsMusicRadio

Guest
I will never make fun of GBC again. Their newsletter (if I am reading it right) warns against an expansion of the TSA powers well beyond airports. Also, they cite a man I respect, Rep. Ron Paul. I agree with their points and I apologize to anybody I tried to offend.
 
Alex Jones likes Ron Paul!
We are honored to have gone to high school with a fan of both, Rolly James.
 
Don't forget to read-up on the implementation of the "New" FCC EAS regulations and mandates. EAS[EBS] used to be voluntary. Now it will include the use of ANY device that communicates, in any way, to FCC devices/"public" airways period.
 
TurboSparky said:
EAS[EBS] used to be voluntary.
The system was never voluntary. "This station, in voluntary cooperation with federal, state, and local authorities..." was an outright lie, but it made the stations sound community minded, so they went along. There were strict guidelines on how tests were to be conducted and fines were given for deviations from procedure..
 
granted Bruce is not all there at times from what i hear from inside the Genisis Walls but that don't sound like him! Ms Music I think Cedric was right you got the wrong Genisis Broadcasting Company
 
I may be mistaken, but prior to 1996 or so, it was voluntary at the federal level, but what did the Telecommunications Act (circa '96) say the FCC "should" do? I hope, in the event of a thermonuclear war that prudence would dictate the broadcast of pertinent information on/at the national level.
"The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is a nationwide emergency alerting program that broadcasters, cable and wireless cable television systems, and other service providers identified by the Commission (as EAS Participants) must provide communications capability to the President to address the nation in national emergencies. EAS also is available at the state and local level to enable EAS Participants, on a voluntary basis, to transmit local or state emergency information, such as severe weather warnings and child abduction alerts (“Amber Alerts”). The Commission, in conjunction with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Weather Service (NWS), implement EAS at the federal level. "
I am just some listener/radiophile. Why "must" private stations make available time/space for the Office of the President of the United States of America, to "address" me/us? Even on my private cell phones and other wireless technologies?
It was "voluntary" at the federal level, now it is not; or am I mistaken? Is analog radio the next "target of opportunity" for mandated digitization, thus effectively reducing the "diversity" of the airways? (It has already occured with television.)
 
Genisis network and Genisis Broadcasting are two different animals... And I can confirm with Butters that not only is Bruce not all there he is a flake. Nothing personal just a fact.
 
TurboSparky said:
Why "must" private stations make available time/space for the Office of the President of the United States of America, to "address" me/us? Even on my private cell phones and other wireless technologies?

The reason why there are plans to develop a national EAS test is solely for the purpose of actually using it -- over the years since the days of CONELRAD, there have been many an event of national significance, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and 9/11, yet the EAS and its predecessors were never used, mainly because the radio and TV stations and networks scooped them.

While the EAS may be vital on a local level, especially in areas that larger stations either don't touch or would be overkill, its usage as a national alert system may already be outmoded, as the infrastructure of local stations are already there.

As for its use on cell phones -- EAS usage there will more be in a form of text messaging. I don't think your telephone conversations will be rudely interrupted for a mandatory test, with instructions saying not to say anything you were going to say (EAS tests on cable block all programs during the tests).

More here:

http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0203/DOC-304451A1.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0203/FCC-11-12A1.pdf
 
Good, because I'm very old school... NO texting, and not even a camera... It's a cell PHONE...and you know.. sometimes I don't even answer it !!!
 
I am not so concerned with my conversations being interupted, rather the techniques being employed for "network control." If "national security" is the concern, we [U.S.] are in a world of hurt if private enterprises are mandated to become agents of the Federal government; regardless of the "emergency."
I sure expect stations to "break-in" in the event of a man-made, or natural, disaster if said disaster effects the "nation" as a whole; that is responsible. However-and please think objectively-what other reason than the aforementioned disasters, "must" the Office of the President of the United States send/contact/break-in to pass information? Wouldn't/shouldn't that fall under the cognizant responsibility of any states Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and/or emergency communications adjutant/directorate? A Governor must-there's that word again-"invite" FEMA into his/her state before FEMA/higher authority can act for/in the best interest of said state.
Regulations and standardization at some levels are acceptable; bandwidth, frequency, power, uplink-downlink etc...efficiency and propagation standards etc. However, mandates [executive orders] ordering private institutions to "make available time" for the President of the United States to address anyone is similar to the "Apple" commercial during the 1984 Olympics. It's message is duplicitous at best.
Consider this also: If a "man-made disaster (similar to a massive WMD [EMPs]) is so threatening; why are there no new Federal mandates to build/include "Fallout Shelters" in building codes? If an EMP was/is the threat, wouldn't/shouldn't wireless technologies be "hardened" against such events? Most of these/those questions are rhetorical, in an attempt to initiate a "thinking outside the box" mentallity. Remember, diversity is more important to the FCC than redundancy. (I hope I spelled things correctly- spell check killed me.)
Thanks for the links etc. My original quote is from the FCC site.
 
TurboSparky said:
I am not so concerned with my conversations being interupted, rather the techniques being employed for "network control." If "national security" is the concern, we [U.S.] are in a world of hurt if private enterprises are mandated to become agents of the Federal government; regardless of the "emergency."

Uh Sparky, forgetting for a moment that you were commenting on the cell phone aspect, that is EXACTLY what the EAS does. Private enterprise (we owners of radio stations) are mandated to broadcast these alerts over our stations (agents as you put it). So I guess the world of hurt arrived back in the 60's when Conelrad was implemented.

Dont get me wrong, I do not disagree with many of the things you put forth, just pointing out that that ship sailed long ago regarding us becomming mouthpieces for the government- either federal, state, or local if they know how to access the system. My biggest rant with the new CAP protocals is that my two stations are at the end of line so to speak of the statewide plan. We feed no stations downstream, just received the messages from upstream and rebroadcast them. So if I can continue to receive and rebroadcast those messages why do I need to spend a lot of money to replace my existing EAS unit. I dont need to decode messages from the White House, my LP1 and LP2 stations do. And the funniest thing is, if the lives of the good citizens of my service area are dependant on our local crappy DSL internet service to provide an alternate connection to my new, expensive EAS unit, then we really are in a world of hurt. Rant OFF.
 
beachbumstar said:
Genesis network and Genesis Broadcasting are two different animals...

And I can confirm that neither Phil Collins nor Mike Rutherford have been employed with either entity. ::)

I believe GCN also distributed "Free Talk Live" which is heard on WFLA on weekends.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom