> What I wrote was "anybody but Gallagher" as a preference but
> an assertion.
>
> My assertion is Beck's show has peaked. I understand you
> like his program but I put him in the category of
> "talentless hacks" (personal opinion) in contrast to people
> like Rush (to a less extent, Hannity) who are talented,
> creative and radio. Beck's angry good ol' boy act may play
> in Tampa, but not in New York.
I understand your assessment of my assertion, but I disagree thoroughly that Sean Hannity is at all talented. I've yet to meet, face-to-face, a radio guy who thinks Hannity is worth a bag of donuts. Same old guests, boring monologues, pimping the RNC, carrying water to get top guests, too many "how are yous" and "you're a great American" with callers, mediocre voice, no originality, Rush rip-off, went bigtime by copying Rush's schtick in the daypart right after Rush... not hard to get listeners.
Likewise, I can understand why you do not like Glenn Beck, and my comments are opinion only. However, I do think that, on paper, Glenn uses unique tactics to express an idea, utilizes humor (which is usually funny), has no guests and fewer callers (both of which are crutches except for a few good hosts like Dr. Laura or Leykis). Perhaps Beck would not work in NY - although I would assert that entertainment is always in demand, and compared to Rambling and Joan, Beck would work well. Sure, he might drive off the geriatrics, but when a heritage station is as bad as 710, I advocate a serious facelift. And while you're at it, how about some KFI-style imaging (which bierkenstock knows is another favorite of mine) and positioners like "Where local news comes first".
> Since the delayed partial broadcast of Laura Ingraham is the
> only TRN show on WABC, I don't they need to worry too much
> about upsetting WABC. ABC and TRN are competitors in the
> syndication business and WABC has show a preference for
> shows from the company stable.
>
> > I would agree that the odds are not good, because Beck has
>
> > been in NYC on business before. Premiere certainly has
> > offices there. Your "anybody but Beck" assertion is a bit
> > misguided, though. Beck did get booted off WTAM/Cleveland
> > for Jerry Springer, the only non-libtalker he is on, and
> the
> > results are mediocre... Jerry drew all of about 50 people
> at
> > a station event. Beck has lost WGST/Atlanta, a CC
> > bottomfeeder, and WISN/Milwaukee. Outside of that, I hear
> > good things, including rumblings from Salem in LA that
> they
> > would put Beck on mornings or at least middays if their
> > hands weren't tied to SRN crap.
> >
> > Despite WOR carrying TRN via Savage, TRN would be crazy to
>
> > upset WABC by taking Ingraham away. I suppose Beck does a
> > different type of show that some people can not
> appreciate.
> > It's unfortunate that talentless hacks like Tony Snow and
> > the object of PD's self-gratification fantasies, Larua
> > Ingraham, do well with little radio experience, little
> > creativity, and little entertainment.
> >
> > As to Gambling, I do think his name would prevent him from
>
> > being bumped. As much as I like Beck, I do think a
> > once-great station like 770 should have SOME local
> content.
> > How long before Mark Levin is bumped for ABCRN syndication
>
> > crapola Mark Davis?
> >
>