fred flintstone said:
evnlee said:
I thought his real 'prominence' started after he moved his show from Tampa to Philly. When Premiere came calling, he packed up and got out of Bubba-land.
Currently, WABC carries a local show with the most recent John Gambling and WOR carries two local consumer advice programs. Of course, Clear Channel's Premiere Radio could take a page from ABC's playbook and threaten to pull Rush from WABC unless they clear Beck. ???
ABC is just the latest in a string. Premiere doesn't do it much, at least any more, and certainly not with Rush. Not on a widespread basis at least. The days of Dean Edell for Rush are basically over, although CC does try and mandate that it's owned stations clear certain Premiere programming, like Edell. However, seeing that Beck and the lesser hosts in their stable aren't on a lot of CC stations, even that is a stretch.
They could always do what Westwood One does. WW1, having no good shows to use as leverage, pays. O'Reilly on WOR? Check please.
evnlee said:
fred flintstone said:
Beck came to prominence out of Clear Channel's WFLA in Tampa based on his appeal to the redneck-trailer trash-Bubba demo. Premiere currently has him on 232 stations up against fellow angry Good ol' boy Mike Gallagher (six of one; half a dozen of the other). Reportedly, he has picked up stations since Fox's Tony Snow dropped out of the mid-morning radio time slot to shill for Bush. Headline News claims Beck has the fastest growing audience in cable. Of course, it's easy to get a big percentage from a small base.
Question is: How will his Dukes of Hazard presentation of right-wing politics play over breakfast?
IMHO, I like the Glenn Back show less and less. What with the stage show, magazine, cable news program, his show sounds more like an infomercial now. The funny bits his staff used to come up with are now eaten up by ads for his line of 'stuff'. His move to Radio City make's his 'back porch' sound unauthentic. 'Not so much ' as he would say.
I was a Glenn fan, but he's stretched himself too thin and now his show shows it. Too many other options on the dial. The GMA gig is only going to make matters worse.
I would hardly call Gallagher and Beck similar. Ingraham and Beck maybe; people say she's funny but I don't get it. And that voice. Anyway, Gallagher is a right-wing tool who got lucky with a gig on WABC and was bland enough to attract the ear of Salem. He's a nobody. His gig on FNC is as a token Hannity supporter who makes Hannity's barely above average talent look good. After all, if Beck, Savage, or someone similar who actually took an approach different than reading the RNC playbook on the air went against Hannity, how would that look?
As to stretching too thin, they still have plenty of bits on the show. Sure, some are mediocre, but that's not the point. The question is, just what is a "guest contributor"? You mean he's a guest every once in awhile? That shouldn't take forever!
fred flintstone said:
The AP reports Premiere Radio (Clear Channel) mid-morning talk show host Glenn Beck has lined up a second regular TV gig as "guest contributor" for ABC's Good Morning America. Apparently, Beck will come on as a "usual suspect" talking head. Beck also does an weekday evening TV show for CNN Headline News (which should change its name because it is no longer a wall-to-wall all news channel).
I think he's going to be the exact opposite of the "usual suspect talking head". He has mentioned before, which has been a topic of discussion here, that after 9/11 he became too O'Reilly-Hannityish, and wanted to snap out of it. I think if GMA wanted a typical talking head, there are plenty of other, better candidates.