FRR said:.....was subjected to over 20 commercials in a row for nearly 6 minutes. How does the network expect anyone to put up with that?
Iowan said:Why bother making 'Good Afternoon, America' in the first place if it's only gonna run during the summer?
justpassingthough said:Iowan said:Why bother making 'Good Afternoon, America' in the first place if it's only gonna run during the summer?
Its practically free to produce another hour of infotainment when the sets are built, the talent and producers are paid for, etc so its cheaper than any new show would be, and you get a chance to see if you make any in-roads against the other networks with cheap programming.
justpassingthough said:Iowan said:Why bother making 'Good Afternoon, America' in the first place if it's only gonna run during the summer?
Its practically free to produce another hour of infotainment when the sets are built, the talent and producers are paid for, etc so its cheaper than any new show would be, and you get a chance to see if you make any in-roads against the other networks with cheap programming.
1069_KIFR said:Should 'Katie' Fail, maybe they'll bring back either Jenny Jones or Sally Jessie Raphael!
bpatrick said:1069_KIFR said:Should 'Katie' Fail, maybe they'll bring back either Jenny Jones or Sally Jessie Raphael!
I'm waiting to see if WSB starts its news at 3 in the event Katie fails. :![]()
bpatrick said:Those who think Katie's show won't make it, barring something unique, have a precedent: Jane Pauley tried the same thing a few years ago and was a colossal flop.
And to the person in Chicago who commented on WLS's changes: why don't they put Katie at 2 and leave "Jeopardy!" and "Inside Edition" where they are?
bpatrick said:justpassingthough said:Iowan said:Why bother making 'Good Afternoon, America' in the first place if it's only gonna run during the summer?
Its practically free to produce another hour of infotainment when the sets are built, the talent and producers are paid for, etc so its cheaper than any new show would be, and you get a chance to see if you make any in-roads against the other networks with cheap programming.
I think possibly ABC saw "The Revolution" as beyond saving, and with Katie's show not scheduled to start until Sept. 10 (at which point "General Hospital" moves to 2/1), the Alphabet Network needed a filler. I see "GAA" as a hedge in case "GH" flops in its new time; it can be revived with little loss of time or money.
Those who think Katie's show won't make it, barring something unique, have a precedent: Jane Pauley tried the same thing a few years ago and was a colossal flop.
And to the person in Chicago who commented on WLS's changes: why don't they put Katie at 2 and leave "Jeopardy!" and "Inside Edition" where they are?
smaug07 said:Who actually watches these programs from start to finish, and are the ratings really that good? At least CBS keeps their morning program to two hours.