• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Good article on satellite radio

Mike_Saffran

Mike_Saffran

Today's (Nov. 21) Hartford (Conn.) Business Journal:

Satellite vs. terrestrial: Regional radio ready to take on Sirius rivals (second article down):

http://www.hbjournal.com/index.shtml
 
> Today's (Nov. 21) Hartford (Conn.) Business Journal:
>
> Satellite vs. terrestrial: Regional radio ready to take on
> Sirius rivals (second article down):
>
> http://www.hbjournal.com/index.shtml
>
Good points on both sides....I subscribe to sirius because it gives me decent music channels with none of the commercial radio bull.
 
> Today's (Nov. 21) Hartford (Conn.) Business Journal:
>
> Satellite vs. terrestrial: Regional radio ready to take on
> Sirius rivals (second article down):
>
> http://www.hbjournal.com/index.shtml
>


They made a tiny mistake, WCCC is not 106.5, it's 106.9 as it's correcly listed in the chart further into the article.

The Chart is way off on city of license though, all the stations are listed as being located in the city of the studio location, not the City of License.
 
> > Today's (Nov. 21) Hartford (Conn.) Business Journal:
> >
> > Satellite vs. terrestrial: Regional radio ready to take on
>
> > Sirius rivals (second article down):
> >
> > http://www.hbjournal.com/index.shtml
> >
> Good points on both sides....I subscribe to sirius because
> it gives me decent music channels with none of the
> commercial radio bull.
>
they better be worried..why would you listen to a radio station with 25 minutes of commercials per hour and the same 40 songs over and over again when you can have 67 commercial free music channels on xm or sirius..and even sirius doesnt repeat as bad as fm..<P ID="signature">______________
note to tvland...bring back wkrp!!!</P>
 
> Today's (Nov. 21) Hartford (Conn.) Business Journal:
>
> Satellite vs. terrestrial: Regional radio ready to take on
> Sirius rivals (second article down):
>
> http://www.hbjournal.com/index.shtml

Article was lame. I get why you might say it was "good" but it was the same rhetoric we keep hearing. Terrestrial radio saying "we're local" and satellite saying "we compliment terrestrial radio." BORING. It's all played out. Let's just hurry up and wait. Unless someone has something NOT SAID YET about the situation, stop writing articles about it. No one is saying anything new.

I rank the article a "I needed to submit a 500-word article and figured I'd do something easy."
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom