• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Good bye VOA, RFE, RFA, Radio Marti

Trump has ordered all employees of the U.S. Agency for Global Media which operates the Voice of America and Radio/TV Marti on to administrative leave with no access to their offices, studios, transmitter sites. He promised to do it and he has. Sadly, the US will loose a valuable asset that will never be restored.
 
The courts have reinstated the jobs of tens of thousands of government employees that Trump furloughed. We'll see if these radio employees also get reinstated.
 
As we've discussed, the agency is independent and not subject to the whim of the president. The EO references "statute," and the statute says he can't do this. The fact that the employees are on administrative leave and not fired says to me that this is a test case.
 
As we've discussed, the agency is independent and not subject to the whim of the president. The EO references "statute," and the statute says he can't do this. The fact that the employees are on administrative leave and not fired says to me that this is a test case.
But, for all practical purposes, VOA and the sub-sets are not operating and dead.
 
Their staffs are all still being paid.
But the "stations" are either running repeats or not running at all. That is "dead" to me.
 
Hundreds of radio stations in the US run repeats and fill music on weekends. Are they dead too?
The USAGM output now consists of increasingly outdated recorded newscasts current affairs programs. The music fill is just a few tunes repeated ad nauseum.

It’s like a redirect loop without any redirect instructions.
 
The USAGM output now consists of increasingly outdated recorded newscasts current affairs programs.

To the administration, that's better than what they had been doing. Read this statement from the white house on the VOA shutdown:

 
Divorcing this from the political context, does the U.S. really need a World War II and Cold War propaganda medium today - especially one that relies on largely obsolete short-wave broadcasting?
 
Divorcing this from the political context, does the U.S. really need a World War II and Cold War propaganda medium today - especially one that relies on largely obsolete short-wave broadcasting?

It depends on who the administration views as the "enemies." What you're asking was the thrust of the section on USAGM in Project 2025. The author of that article is back at the agency now, so those questions are being asked. She specifically brought up shortwave in the article. My take based on what she wrote was that it was an open question. But they definitely see the value in any kind of media, especially if they can control the message.

This morning Lindsey Graham was asked about all this, and it was obvious he still feels a need for this kind of thing aimed at Russia. I agree that shortwave is probably not the most effective transmission system. But the people making the decisions are more interested in the message, not the medium.

I knew somebody on the BBOG that predated the USAGM during the Iraq war. They were running a radio station in Baghdad after the capture of Saddam and the occupation of the city. The radio station was mainly a music station. It wasn't as much news and information, but "soft diplomacy," winning the "hearts & minds" of the people. One day my friend told me that US radio station was #1 in Baghdad! He was as excited about it as if it was a Nielsen station in NYC. That's where I see this going.
 
Last edited:
Following the statement from the white house, there was this statement from Kari Lake at USAGM:


This agency is not salvageable. From top-to-bottom this agency is a giant rot and burden to the American taxpayer—a national security risk for this nation—and irretrievably broken. While there are bright spots within the agency with personnel who are talented and dedicated public servants, this is the exception rather than the rule.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom