• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

GRC Delusional

Damn David, I thought you were smarter than this. It's very very very obvious to anyone who's been around these boards a while to realize that BC_714 is definitely NOT Glenn. Syntax is different, sentence construction is different, Glenn never referred to you as Gleason, your last name. Sure he may have the same take on illegals as Glenn has, but a simple check of the profile shows BC_714 registered back in December 2004. It's not Glenn, David. If Glenn is still visiting here he must be laughing his rear end off at your presumption.
 
SuperRadioFan said:
Damn David, I thought you were smarter than this. It's very very very obvious to anyone who's been around these boards a while to realize that BC_714 is definitely NOT Glenn. Syntax is different, sentence construction is different, Glenn never referred to you as Gleason, your last name. Sure he may have the same take on illegals as Glenn has, but a simple check of the profile shows BC_714 registered back in December 2004. It's not Glenn, David. If Glenn is still visiting here he must be laughing his rear end off at your presumption.
Click to expand...

If it walks, talks and quacks like a duck... all of us can change syntax just as we can imitate accents. The arguments and biases are pure Glen. In particular, the inability to answer a direct question has been his characteristic for half a decade (I asked what would make a new Spanish station great, and got a rant about what is wrong with the USA.)

In any event, the issue is a valid topic of its own... "who would be a PPM panelist." Or, more correctly, "What kind of family would become and remain a PPM panel family or household?"

Obviously, illegal aliens, felons with outstanding warrants, child support evaders, sex offenders and anyone else who does not want to be found, traced or discovered will not be part of the process as a rule. What other traits or characteristics would preclude a household from participating? And that is keeping in mind that if one person in the houshold does not comply, the whole unit is dismissed...
 
OMG LOL LOL LOL LOL You are hopeless in this case hahaha. You never never never never can even admit that you COULD be incorrect. Whatever, Dude, you and your 30-40,000 posts (made at the airport and on lunch break and at home in ten years) are very entertaining as usual. [for those who think he's only at the 16,700 post mark haven't been around long enough to see posts made by 'old gringo' and the previous SN to that one]

David I think I almost have a man crush on you LOL!!!!!!!!!
 
SuperRadioFan said:
OMG LOL LOL LOL LOL You are hopeless in this case hahaha. You never never never never can even admit that you COULD be incorrect. Whatever, Dude, you and your 30-40,000 posts (made at the airport and on lunch break and at home in ten years) are very entertaining as usual. [for those who think he's only at the 16,700 post mark haven't been around long enough to see posts made by 'old gringo' and the previous SN to that one]

David I think I almost have a man crush on you LOL!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

David,

Gotta agree with Super. No way is BC Glenn, for all of the reasons Super mentioned - sentence structure and syntax primarily.

Also not really sure why you are arguing with an obvious troll. It is beneath you.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom