• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Greater Media Strikes Again!

T

Those RRRRs

Guest
OK...The Hawk is gone, we get it. What is the point of simulcasting WMGK on 97.5 for two days?

It does no good to promote WMGK within an area in which 97.5 is received and 102.9 is not. After Friday at 6:00, those listeners out of WMGK's range will not be able to hear the station at all after 97.5 switches to Jazz.

And those of us who are within the range of both 97.5 and 102.9 are already aware of WMGK and their repetitive Chicken Rock Playlist.

So why promote a station to an audience that won't hear it after Friday? Listeners of 97.5 don't need Debella talking over "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life," with their morning cup of coffee to figure out that The Hawk is gone. I think most people are smarter than that.

In my opinion, Greater Media should have seized the opportunity to simulcast (the doomed) 950 WPEN on 97.5 for two days. Joe Sixpack and Suzy SUV don't know anything about 950 AM. If people scanning the FM dial heard sports talk and if Greater Media promoted the hell out of the fact that they were ACTUALLY listening to 950 WPEN, maybe some more people would start listening to the station and 950's ratings would at least make it off the bottom with the rest of the poop eaters.

Even if the ratings only increased half of a share in the next book, why not take advantage of some free FM Stereo promotion for "The Station of the Ships (Sunken...that is)?"

Maybe I'm nuts. Any thoughts?
 
DUDE YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE FRIGGIN' HEAD!!!

I was bascially ridiculed on the NJ board for stating basically the same idea you have albeit NOT as bluntly. 'MGK and The Hawk were two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT animals and any comparison otherwise is strictly BS. Look at it this way, while I don't advocate Live and Local Jocks losing their jobs, I DO however feel that if it IS indeed all about the mighty dollar in this business, why didn't GM say hmmmm if we put "The Hawk" on 102.9 we could perhaps voicetrack and save a HUGE amount of money. Now before anyone gives me this "Well The Hawk didn't bill anything near what 'MGK does" OR "Well why the hell would GM do this when they have a Heritage Classic Rocker in Philly" tell me how well the CURRENT 97.5 signal comes in in the bulk of Philly? This really would have been a mute point since the 102.9 signal already covers an area where The Hawk never quite could. Am I speculating here...Yeah but anyone/anything contrary would be too!

While I DO feel like the folks in NYC did last year when CBS-FM was blown-up, atleast there is a bright side in this case that WTHK was able to sign off in style and in perfect fashion! 'MGK may be Classic Rock, it will NEVER be what "The Hawk" was. With DeBella and Gardner and even Debbi Calton comes BIG Payroll numbers and GM thought nothing of dumping the jocks prior to the "Ben" debut so why not here in this case. I'm not knocking GM for bringing back 'JJZ I am just saying there was perhaps a way to accomodate everyone as unrealistic as my vision may or may not be...

"#1 For Classic Rock, 97.5 The Hawk ROCKS The GREAT BEYOND!!"
 
Re: Greater Media - Simulcast-Announcements Similar to WMGK 1975

I think it makes some sense. Forgetting those of us reading these radio boards, there are many average listeners in the Bucks-Montgomery-Burlington-Mercer-Northeast Philly areas that may have listened to the Hawk since it replaced WNJO and haven't sampled WMGK for many years. They will have to decide if they like it enough to tune in to 102.9 after tomorrow, but it may stop them from tuning around and sampling Frank, The Hawk 99.9, The Hawk 105.7 or any other station. It's more likely the Hawk's classic rock audience might sample MGK than a sports talk station.

It reminds me of many years ago in 1975 when WPEN's 95PEN oldies format was simulcast on WPEN-FM 102.9 for about 6 months. Then for several days before the birth of WMGK "Magic 103" they would interrupt every few songs only on 102.9 with an announcement from morning host Loren Owens that if you tuned over to 95 AM right now you wouldn't have to listen to these interruptions to your favorite music anymore. By the time they switched anyone listening for more than a few minutes knew if they wanted oldies to tune to 950.
 
Those RRRRs said:
OK...The Hawk is gone, we get it. What is the point of simulcasting WMGK on 97.5 for two days?

I was thinking the same thing. I heard WMGK play a liner (on 97.5) about being stuck in traffic on the Schuylkill Expy. Must make those former Hawk listeners in Princeton feel all warm and fuzzy. Not only are you pissing off the diehards, you're alienating them, too!

Why not just leave the transmitter off for a couple days? Are they that desperate for whatever Hawk listeners they can pick-up in Bucks County?!
 
I Absolutely Cannot Believe What I'm Reading On This Thread

My mind continues to spin at the completely nonsensical bunkum I keep finding on various message boards related to the very uneventful end of a very mediocre small-market radio station.

Those RRRR's asked if he was nuts. In the eyes of this longtime radio analyst, the answer is "yes"...

Those RRRR's completely shoots down his own argument within his own post-- by saying a large chunk of 97.5's footprint cannot pick up WMGK, but then suggesting the station simulcast WPEN (which is even LESS likely heard by 97.5's coverage area)...

I've said this over and over again, but it astounds me how you guys can claim WMGK's playlist is "chicken rock" and repetitive (which it is, and for good reason) when The Hawk did the exact same thing (and to a much worse extreme). The Hawk was a trillion times more "safe" than 'MGK on its worst day. Maybe you guys think hearing "Sweet Home Alabama" and "Another Brick In The Wall" is riveting radio. Well, rest assured, WMGK plays that overheard junk too.

GREATER MEDIA DID NOT KILL THE HAWK. NASSAU DID.

GREATER MEDIA DID NOT KILL THE HAWK. NASSAU DID.

GREATER MEDIA DID NOT KILL THE HAWK. NASSAU DID.

The intellectual property of "The Hawk" (whatever that was worth, and I would argue it's value was minimal) was NOT INCLUDED IN THE SALE. I don't know how many other ways I can reiterate this.

GREATER MEDIA DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION TO KEEP THE HAWK. (Even if it did, it would have been a terribly dumb move.)

A good chunk of 97.5's coverage area can receive a quality signal from WMGK. It makes absolute perfect sense for Greater Media to use a couple of days to let THOSE folks know they can hear THE EXACT SAME "HAWK" MUSIC on 102.9.

It does no good to promote WMGK within an area in which 97.5 is received and 102.9 is not. After Friday at 6:00, those listeners out of WMGK's range will not be able to hear the station at all after 97.5 switches to Jazz.

It's not Greater Media's fault some of the current 97.5 listeners can't get WMGK. The simulcast is aimed at recovering the ones who CAN hear the station. Something is much better than nothing.

And those of us who are within the range of both 97.5 and 102.9 are already aware of WMGK and their repetitive Chicken Rock Playlist.

Not necessarily. Normal people aren't radio geeks like us. They have lives, and terrestrial radio is an increasingly smaller part of those lives. You'd be amazed how little the average person knows (or cares) about terrestrial radio.

In my opinion, Greater Media should have seized the opportunity to simulcast (the doomed) 950 WPEN on 97.5 for two days. Joe Sixpack and Suzy SUV don't know anything about 950 AM.

By your own admission, WPEN is "doomed" anyway. And as I mentioned already, even fewer people in 97.5's signal area can hear WPEN (than can hear WMGK). This is the chance for Greater Media to let former Hawk listeners know THE EXACT SAME MUSIC is available on its other frequency. Besides, "Suzy SUV" is not going to listen to WPEN anyway. She's not part of WPEN's target. I don't mean to be rude, but that has got to be the dumbest thing I've heard all week-- no offense intended personally.

'MGK and The Hawk were two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT animals and any comparison otherwise is strictly BS.

Other than the fact that one is a major-market station and the other was a small-market one, please enlighten me on what was so different about these stations. While dozens have been going on and on about how great The Hawk is/was, nobody has been able to produce a damn bit of evidence. Both stations beat the heck out of the same overplayed songs we've been hearing for 30 years. They are/were terrestrial radio stations. That's what they are/were supposed to do. Only WMGK actually has/had a better variety (and that's not even counting Alice Cooper's syndicated program or Little Steven's Underground Garage, both of which play tons of music The Hawk wouldn't have touched in a million years).

Look at it this way, while I don't advocate Live and Local Jocks losing their jobs, I DO however feel that if it IS indeed all about the mighty dollar in this business, why didn't GM say hmmmm if we put "The Hawk" on 102.9 we could perhaps voicetrack and save a HUGE amount of money.

First of all, it's my understanding a large portion (possibly almost all) of The Hawk was voicetracked to begin with, and the morning show was a syndicated one out of Grand Rapids, Michigan. So much for your "live and local jocks losing their jobs" theory. At least one (and possibly more) have been re-assigned to other properties within the Nassau Broadcasting organization. Besides, people in radio (and every other walk of life) lose their jobs every day. I have, and you probably have as well. It happens. Just ask any of hundreds of former Clear Channel guys this week.

Again, "The Hawk" remains the intellectual property of Nassau. This was made very clear in the trades at the time of the sale. Greater Media didn't really have the choice to keep "The Hawk", outside of perhaps a licensing agreement which would have made no sense anyway. Gee, let's flush a MAJOR MARKET brand (that's been around for 10+ years, and 30+ if you count the calls themselves) down the toilet to replace it with a SMALL MARKET brand (around for only a few years, and less than two on that frequency) that few of our listeners have even heard of in the first place! You guys do realize radio is a BUSINESS, right? This would be akin to a small herd of hockey fans trying to tell Ed Snider he should re-name the Flyers the Phantoms. (Okay, maybe this month isn't the time to use that analogy, but you get the point I hope...)

'MGK may be Classic Rock, it will NEVER be what "The Hawk" was.

Oh my God, I'm going crazy trying to understand what the infatuation is with this Hawk. On last week's Radio Racket, Kyle and I BEGGED for over an hour for ANYONE to call-in or E-mail us with an explanation as to what was so special about this radio station. And while our hit counter confirmed tons were listening, NO ONE stepped up to the plate. I DARED ANYONE to name one song (outside of Bon Jovi's "Living On A Prayer") The Hawk played that 'MGK wouldn't. I'm still waiting.

PLEASE, PLEASE, WILL SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT WAS SO GREAT ABOUT THE HAWK?! This was the most mundane, "safe", run-of-the-mill Classic Rock station I have ever heard perhaps in my life (and I've heard many, many of them over the years). There was nothing "wrong" with the station; it was well-programmed. (A tight playlist of overplayed crap is how you win in this business; I am well aware of that. But what extraordinary thing did this very typical, voice-tracked small market station ever do to warrant such blind cheering?)

I was thinking the same thing. I heard WMGK play a liner (on 97.5) about being stuck in traffic on the Schuylkill Expy. Must make those former Hawk listeners in Princeton feel all warm and fuzzy. Not only are you pissing off the diehards, you're alienating them, too!

Why not just leave the transmitter off for a couple days? Are they that desperate for whatever Hawk listeners they can pick-up in Bucks County?!

Was the Schuylkill reference a 97.5-only liner or was it part of the simulcast? If it was a 97.5-only one, then it probably wasn't the brightest thing to run. But I seriously doubt it was "pissing off the diehards". 97.5 is playing the EXACT SAME MUSIC tonight as it was last week. There is no alienation going on, except perhaps for some of those "Free Beer And Hot Wings" listeners. And you know what? Hundreds of morning shows disappear every year in American radio. And many have much bigger audiences. Guess what? The sun still comes up the next day; live does go on for everybody involved.

Leave the transmitter off? Are you serious? Maybe I'm just wasting my time...

Desperate? No, it's just business. Bucks County is a big money part of the Philadelphia market, and pretty much the only part of it where The Hawk came in well-enough to be considered a player. (No, The Hawk was NOT a Philadelphia station, and its signal kept it from ever being one despite what the station's TOH ID proclaimed-- going back to the WPST days.) Why not try to get at least Bucks County into WMGK? It's better than nothing.

Look, I'm just convinced that there are many folks on these boards who for whatever reason have just decided they hate WMGK and no amount of logic will convice them otherwise. I know we live in a society where we love to push for the underdog. But in this case, it's not like the underdog was anything worthy of major praise. It's gone now, and that is the doing purely of NASSAU BROADCASTING. Not Greater Media. Once again, Nassau created then killed your Hawk. Focus your hostility there, as Lou Mercatanti counts the millions his organization got for ending your precious Hawk.

Maybe Kyle and I will once again have to run the "Hawk Sympathizer Phone Line" Friday night, as I'm still in the dark as to why this station is getting so much blind loyalty-- and what made it so different from WMGK...
 
Amen George!!!!!!! The Hawk was McRadio at its worst! Safe, dull, and absolutely no different from any of Nassau's other Hawks. Frankly, its no great loss - you have several other alternatives that are just fine. And, it makes perfect sense for GM to simulcast 'MGK so that Hawk listeners will sample THEIR classic rocker. If they get a few new listeners out of it, all the better.

I occasionally listened to 102.3 The Hawk from Concord, NH when I lived up north and I must say that 97.5 The Hawk is NO DIFFERENT. I, for one, appreciate Greater Media's move as one that will bring more variety to the Philly radio market. Good move....
 
Thank you George... for typing out what I didn't have the time or patience to.
 
Thank you both for your nice words... Glad I could be of service...

Notice the Hawk Sympathizers continue to post on this board today, but in other threads, completely ignoring everything I had to say above... One might think they'd be all over this thread, ripping me and my opinions, but notice they're nowhere to be found on this one... By posting 41 times in two weeks that "MGK sucks", perhaps the thinking there is sooner or later someone'll believe it...

And again, even today, these guys are still blaming Greater Media for the end of The Hawk...
 
Echoing the other comments, George. Very well-stated and thoughtful.

I happened to like the Hawk better than MGK, but recognize the distinction was fairly minor. I still have a classic rock station playing essentially the same stuff, so it's not like it's a major loss.
 
I Can't Believe It Either!

>Those RRRR's asked if he was nuts. In the eyes of this longtime radio analyst, the answer is "yes"...

Very nice Mr. Brusstar. You are undoubtedly the most condescending individual to post on this board. I've noticed your pejorative language in other posts, but have never responded to your arrogance because until now, it wasn't worth my time.

Mr. Brusstar, are you familiar with the term, "argument ad hominem?" In case not, here is the definition for you:

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

1) Person A makes claim X.
2) Person B makes an attack on person A.
3) Therefore A's claim is false.

Your lack of candor toward me by suggesting that I am indeed "nuts" for disagreeing about what should have been simulcast on 97.5 is a perfect example of the foolish and fatuous act of using argument ad hominem, Mr. Brusstar, so I posted the defintion of it for the benefit of those who are unfamiliar with the term.

I know you tried very hard to discredit me, Mr. Brusstar, but the only feat you've accomplished is the classic "drawing of blood and running." I'm a little surprised too, considering what an eloquent author you have proven yourself. Perhaps you learned your art at an Ivy League facility.

>Those RRRR's completely shoots down his own argument within his own post-- by saying a large chunk of 97.5's footprint cannot pick up WMGK, but then suggesting the station simulcast WPEN (which is even LESS likely heard by 97.5's coverage area)...

More Ivy League rhetoric, Mr. Brusstar? Your statement here proves that you either:

A: Read and absorbed only what YOU, Mr. Brusstar, either wished you had read or wanted to read, OR

B: Completely and totally missed the point of my original post. I opine that it is a combination of both.

I never suggested that WMGK should simulcast WPEN for the benefit of those in 97.5's listening area. The suggested simulcast of 950 AM would have been for the benefit of those within the range of WPEN exclusively. Again, I stated that it may benefit Greater Media to give WPEN some free FM Stereo Promotion. I am fascinated and astounded with your conclusion that such a simulcast should benefit those within the range of 97.5 FM only.

>I've said this over and over again, but it astounds me how you guys can claim WMGK's playlist is "chicken rock" and repetitive (which it is, and for good reason)...

Circular Reasoning, Mr Brusstar? I'm sorry, you may continue...

when The Hawk did the exact same thing (and to a much worse extreme). The Hawk was a trillion times more "safe" than 'MGK on its worst day. Maybe you guys think hearing "Sweet Home Alabama" and "Another Brick In The Wall" is riveting radio. Well, rest assured, WMGK plays that overheard junk too.

Argumentum ad Populum, Mr. Brusstar? Again, a definition for you:

Argumentum ad Populum (Literally "Argument to the People"): Using an appeal to popular assent, often by arousing the feelings and enthusiasm of the multitude rather than building an argument.

Where is your argument, Mr. Brusstar? Who has made the statement that The Hawk's playlist was greater than that of WMGK's? I, and many others, have however opined that WMGK plays more tracks that could easily be classified as "Classic Hits," while The Hawk's playlist consisted of less so-called "Classic Hits," and more tunes that would probably be classified as "Classic Rock," or "overplayed junk" as you called it.

I'm sure many fine fans of that music, Mr. Brusstar, sincerely thank you for your classification of 20 years worth of Classic American and British music as "junk." You are on record for such classification.

>GREATER MEDIA DID NOT KILL THE HAWK. NASSAU DID.

>GREATER MEDIA DID NOT KILL THE HAWK. NASSAU DID.

>GREATER MEDIA DID NOT KILL THE HAWK. NASSAU DID.

Repetition, Mr. Brusstar, does not enforce your argument. On the contrary, it suggests you are running out of influential ideas and arguments to support your statement(s).

>A good chunk of 97.5's coverage area can receive a quality signal from WMGK. It makes absolute perfect sense for Greater Media to use a couple of days to let THOSE folks know they can hear THE EXACT SAME "HAWK" MUSIC on 102.9.

THE EXACT SAME MUSIC, Mr. Brusstar? Do you have the playlists from both stations at your disposal? Sounds to me, Mr. Brusstar, like you have used a "faulty analogy."

Here we go with those pesky definitions again:

Faulty Analogy: Relying only on comparisons to prove a point rather than arguing deductively and inductively.

>It's not Greater Media's fault some of the current 97.5 listeners can't get WMGK. The simulcast is aimed at recovering the ones who CAN hear the station. Something is much better than nothing.

Thank you Mr. Brusstar. No one is placing blame here. Perhaps you are 100% correct in your assessment. However, you have your opinion and I have mine. The difference is, Mr. Brusstar, I am not the one who resorted to the act of name calling.

I said, "And those of us who are within the range of both 97.5 and 102.9 are already aware of WMGK and their repetitive Chicken Rock Playlist."

You said, "Not necessarily. Normal people aren't radio geeks like us. They have lives, and terrestrial radio is an increasingly smaller part of those lives. You'd be amazed how little the average person knows (or cares) about terrestrial radio."

What is your defintion of "normal," Mr. Brusstar? Are you and your groupies the epitome of all that is normal? Will those of us who don't drink Mr. Brusstars' Kool-Aid mysteriously have our screen names vanished in the night?

You are correct Mr. Brusstar. Radio is indeed a small part of most people's lives. However, I maintain that fans and followers of "Classic Rock and/or Hits" in our area are familiar with both WMGK and the former "Hawk."

I said, "In my opinion, Greater Media should have seized the opportunity to simulcast (the doomed) 950 WPEN on 97.5 for two days. Joe Sixpack and Suzy SUV don't know anything about 950 AM."

You said, "By your own admission, WPEN is "doomed" anyway. Besides, "Suzy SUV" is not going to listen to WPEN anyway. She's not part of WPEN's target. I don't mean to be rude, but that has got to be the dumbest thing I've heard all week-- no offense intended personally."

None taken, Mr. Brusstar. However thusfar, you are the one who has offered nothing but broad generalizations and attacks toward those with whom you disagree. I don't consider you to be rude, Mr. Brusstar. I call you passionate. You claim to be a radio analyst, Mr. Brusstar. Maybe you should "analyze" and "process" your thoughts more thoroughly before you put them on paper and embarrass yourself in public.

Yes, WPEN is probably doomed, and it is a "sunken ship" in its current state. To quote you, Mr. Brusstar in this same post, "something is better than nothing." That is why I suggested some free promotion for a couple of days. So far as "Suzy SUV" is concerned, she is a metaphor, that is all.

I know it is a lot of information to process in one day, Mr. Brusstar, but I have a tingling feeling that it may be necessary to refresh your memory.

A metaphor is defined as, "a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them."

In other words, "Suzy SUV" doesn't exixt. However if she did, Mr. Brusstar, may I suggest that it is an incondite conclusion on your part to assume that she would not listen to WPEN and that she is not part of WPEN's target.

I'm not surprised, Mr. Brusstar, at some of the comments of your followers. You seem to have cast a spell on the minds of those who will agree with almost anything you write. In fact, I can't say that I ever remember anyone on this board ever challenging you. It's like what you write is the Gospel Truth, and no one better have a differing opinion or he/she will feel your wrath.

I will say though, that I am particularly surprised at Mr. HomerJay. He is a bright fellow, who most often comes to HIS OWN conclusions and ideas, and eloquently displays those ideas through his ardent use of the English language. To watch him write only a couple of lines on this subject is disappointing. I hope he hasn't had the Kool-Aid too. I like when he takes the time to tear me apart line by line. He presents more of a challenge to me than you, Mr. Brusstar.

I trust that this puts an end to this topic Mr. Brusstar. I'll try to catch your show for a while when I return this evening. BTW, funny stuff a couple months back with the McVLT bit about a certain radio personality in these parts.
 
When you learn how to properly use the "quote" feature, I'll thorougly read (rather than glance at) your tirade and possibly respond. If you don't like my writings, don't read them.

(Last night, someone read me the highlights of your absolute madness. A comparison of the radio-content-to-personal-attack-quotients of our two long posts is self-explanatory.)

P.S. -- As for your being "nuts", well, you asked. If you're not prepared to deal with the answer to a question, even a rhetorical one, then don't ask it.
 
>When you learn how to properly use the "quote" feature, I'll thorougly read (rather than glance at) your tirade and possibly respond.

A wise man once said, "to err is human, to forgive is divine." Thank you Mr. Brusstar. Perhaps I made an error in my sentence structure. Let's consult Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia to determine if this is the case.

According to Wikipedia,"The American convention is for sentence punctuation to be included inside the quotation marks, even if the punctuation is not part of the quoted sentence, while the British style shows clearly whether or not the punctuation is part of the quoted phrase." For example:

Someone shouted, ‘Shut up!’. (British)
Someone shouted, “Shut up!” (American)

As you can clearly see, the American way of constructing a proper English sentence is to place the punctuation, in this case the comma, INSIDE the QUOTES. If you re-read my original post you will see that is exactly how I constructed my sentences. Now let's look at a line from your response.

>P.S. -- As for your being "nuts", well, you asked.

Wait a minute chap, it looks like you have used the British form of constructing a sentence by placing the comma OUTSIDE the QUOTES. You don't sound British on the radio. Did you lose your European dialect when you returned to the states?

I, Mr. Brusstar, never attended school in Europe. I only learned the American way to write sentences. But considering that we are indeed in the United States, it doesn't look like I made an error, does it chap?

>If you don't like my writings, don't read them.

I didn't say I didn't like your writings. Besides, how am I to know that I don't like your writings unless I read what you write, chap?

>(Last night, someone read me the highlights of your absolute madness. A comparison of the radio-content-to-personal-attack-quotients of our two long posts is self-explanatory.)

A tirade, Mr. Brusstar? You aren't one who should be criticizing others for running a rampant tirade. That is laughable at best. I suppose it's "normal" for you to go on a tirade about my post concerning WMGK and "The Hawk," but if someone responds to YOUR tirade than he is mad. You need to go back to my original response and read more about "argument ad hominem."

>P.S. -- As for your being "nuts", well, you asked. If you're not prepared to deal with the answer to a question, even a rhetorical one, then don't ask it.

Again with the attacks. I'm not RJ. I won't call your show and yell at you to promote your sadistic pleasure. Your attacks mean nothing to me because you have proved that you can not win this argument through inductive and deductive reasoning. You have only your ego and wit at your disposal. I'm not afraid of you Mr. Brusstar. I won't run away from your posts like a dog with his tail between his legs like so many others have on this board.
 
>So, you like my wit and ego? (confused)

>Thanks, in advance...

Absolutely! I was rolling last night when you played the bitabout RJ and the brokered microphone.

Good interview with Michael Tozzi too. I wasn't aware that he's been a Philly radio icon for so long. He was interesing.

I must have missed the time at which someone read my post. I don't doubt that I was the butt of your wit and ego if it was read on the air. In my life I've learned to very rarely blink an eye when others talk about me, so long as people still ARE talking.

The show is great. It's very unique, informative, funny, and entertaining. Please keep up the great work!
 
At the risk of being called a self-promoting rank amateur (guilty as charged), I suspect that, if asked,
the folks who run WRDV would have been entirely happy to provide audio to 97.5 for two days, two weeks,
or whatever. Which might have made the electricity to run the 97.5 transmitter a writeoff, instead of an expense.

Besides, maybe Philadelphia is ready for REAL standards.

We have 9,000 tracks in the library. Beats a 250-song playlist, and that doesn't even count what the staff
brings from home. Oh, and real oldies on weekends. Lots of 'em.

What I wouldn't give for 49,000 more watts.

Bill
 
Those RRRRs said:
Absolutely! I was rolling last night when you played the bitabout RJ and the brokered microphone.
Agreed! That was funnier than most things I've heard on terrestrial radio. Very nice job with Mr. Tozzi, too.
 
>When you learn how to properly use the "quote" feature, I'll thorougly read (rather than glance at) your tirade and possibly respond.

A wise man once said, "to err is human, to forgive is divine." Thank you Mr. Brusstar. Perhaps I made an error in my sentence structure. Let's consult Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia to determine if this is the case.

According to Wikipedia,"The American convention is for sentence punctuation to be included inside the quotation marks, even if the punctuation is not part of the quoted sentence, while the British style shows clearly whether or not the punctuation is part of the quoted phrase." For example:

Someone shouted, ‘Shut up!’. (British)
Someone shouted, “Shut up!” (American)

As you can clearly see, the American way of constructing a proper English sentence is to place the punctuation, in this case the comma, INSIDE the QUOTES. If you re-read my original post you will see that is exactly how I constructed my sentences. Now let's look at a line from your response.

I'm not throwing around any insults here, but I don't think you understand what George is referring to. He is talking about the "quote" feature on this board, like I have used above. Your post from yesterday was very difficult to read because you didn't use the "quote" function that the board offers.

I can explain how to use it if you'd like. If you're interested, just e-mail me and I'll let you know how it works.
 
I'm not throwing around any insults here, but I don't think you understand what George is referring to. He is talking about the "quote" feature on this board, like I have used above. Your post from yesterday was very difficult to read because you didn't use the "quote" function that the board offers.

My bad. Finally heard that part of the show. It's too bad George thought I was personally attacking him. You guys took it the wrong way. It's a moot point now.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom