I just wanna ask poeple here who DXing a long time
Have there ever been a rear for no Skywave at night on the AM band
Have there ever been a rear for no Skywave at night on the AM band
I'm in California, Sacramento, Vallejo
So I don't know about Auroras down here
Just to clarify my point, I wasn't saying that the aurora had to be visible to affect signals. I was simply saying that if the aurora is visible, the effect it has on radio signals tends to be stronger. Most common here in my part of Michigan are the weaker, quick bursts of solar discharge -- the kind that you can only see if you're not looking directly at them and can occasionally hear fizzle as they hit the atmosphere. Those cause bursts of static on the radio, but don't generally silence the whole band. If you get steady waves of weak discharge instead of bursts, it can start to cause some silencing. The more visible the aurora is, the stronger the effect it has. That was what I was saying.And from what I've been told, the Aurora itself doesn't have to be visible to affect matters.
One of the propagation websites mentions that the 'radio aurora zone' goes farther south than the optical aurora zone, i.e. the area where you actually see an aurora.
Their Near Real Time MUF map shows the 'radio aurora zone', which lies in between the green lines on the map.
I suspect that the actual effects of an aurora on the MW extends even further south than the 'radio aurora zone' as shown on the map. The last time we had auroral conditions here in WA the MUF map showed the green colored 'radio aurora zone' a couple states away.
http://www.spacew.com/www/realtime.php
Oh, I didn't mean to say you were, I just wasn't sure if my own initial point was clearOh hey, Josh ..... I wasn't implying or nitpicking.
The odd thing about AM BCB DX is that some of the best DX is heard because conditions are lousy!