• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Handel, John and Ken high on "heavy 100" list Zigler awol from list

M

mred

Guest
his internet whining is because he is a pimple on the other hosts' behinds.
 
mred said:
his internet whining is because he is a pimple on the other hosts' behinds.
Click to expand...

We get that you don't like Ziegler, so move on.

Maybe the fact that he has no show and is only doing "commentary" on KGIL might have something to do with being dropped from the list. Also you can have whatever opinions you want about anyone, this is still a free speech country, however making insensitive and stupid comments about rescuing horses and giving an animal activist a can of horsemeat to use as a paperweight are not humorous nor in good taste. The fact that you continue to make them speaks volumes about your intelligence.
 
I reserve the right to trash people..would you tell JZ or Rush to "Move-on" from bashing Clinton or Jimmy Carter? or whoever. Typical ditto head... you can dish it out but you can't take it. You like the name calling when it is your guy doing it...but just let someone turn the tables, and call one of your heroes a name.

Speaking of moving-on..when is Ziegler going to move-on from being fixated on OJ?
 
mred said:
I reserve the right to trash people..would you tell JZ or Rush to "Move-on" from bashing Clinton or Jimmy Carter? or whoever. Typical ditto head... you can dish it out but you can't take it. You like the name calling when it is your guy doing it...but just let someone turn the tables, and call one of your heroes a name.

Speaking of moving-on..when is Ziegler going to move-on from being fixated on OJ?
Click to expand...

I can and often do make remarks involving Rush's adventures with Oxycontin and Viagra. Actually I think Rush will get better if there is a Clinton in the White House. His blind support of Bush, as well as Ziegler's is hard to fathom to me as well as any thinking individual. I often thought Rush bashing Clinton was very funny and sometimes even to the point. My sole objection to your comments on Ziegler revolve around the constant harping on that unfortunate horse. Sort of like beating a dead horse, oops now you got me doing it. ::)

I think everyone is fixated on OJ especially since when we lose our fixations he does something new to get himself in the news again, like that debacle in Las Vegas. My main issue with OJ, Robert Blake, and Phil Spector et al is how if you are a celebrity you can buy justice. If you are a nobody with no cash you can get railroaded into jail on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses and no one blinks.

My heroes are those who try to bring some actual discourse like Michael Jackson, Dennis Prager, sometimes Neal Boortz and Bill Handel. Ziegler at his best, not on Bush and Iraq, was there as well. John and Ken are in fact professional wrestling for talk radio. They never stay with an issue or even take on an issue if the ratings are not there. Now I know full well that in the business ratings rule so if you aren't getting them you die or get relegated to weak signals if you stay on at all. I just think there can be interesting factual presentations with entertainment too, like Stephanie Miller for instance. She gets out the info and makes me laugh.

I remember when J & K were on one of their rants about sex offender "clown houses" and they ended up doing a remote from Phelan. You could tell that hobnobbing with what they considered "trailer trash" didn't sit well with their sensibilities and you can bet they didn't take, much less return, calls from any of those people once they had used them to boost their ratings. Then there was their "Fire Drier" deal, they haven't done anything like that again (maybe because it showed no result favoring their stance) There exists legions of local legislators who could provide material for their program, how about Boot Berman?
 
Also, let's point out that Zigler has an internet hit piece called "the real kfi" - why doesn't he move on? I don't care if he does or not... I don't work for KFI or it's parent. When I lose a job or quit a job, I move on, slobbermouth apparently does not, which is fine... but quit your whinning...maybe you drive over 10 miles a day to work?
 
mred said:
Also, let's point out that Zigler has an internet hit piece called "the real kfi" - why doesn't he move on? I don't care if he does or not... I don't work for KFI or it's parent. When I lose a job or quit a job, I move on, slobbermouth apparently does not, which is fine... but quit your whinning...maybe you drive over 10 miles a day to work?
Click to expand...

Maybe the OJ principle I alluded to applies, he got a buzz from the hit piece. He is working on some kind of documentary and also started a thrice weekly commentary series on KGIL so the notice can not hurt. And for those of us with touch of the "Inquiring minds need to know" syndrome he confirmed what I had always sensed about John and Ken and behind the scenes at KFI. In any event that buzz has died down and he has I assume moved on to his documentary and his commentaries.

If OJ pulls another property recovery stunt we will all focus on that. Even more at present we have the fighting between Hillary and Obama to keep the pundits chattering so no one is likely to notice Ziegler unless he gets caught in a compromising situation with a Boy Scout.
 
yeah the documentary is on the Clintons and 911....how far will that go if Obama wins the nomination?
 
mred said:
yeah the documentary is on the Clintons and 911....how far will that go if Obama wins the nomination?
Click to expand...

Probably not as far but again you have the inquiring minds syndrome. Maybe there will be a tie in to John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou which would go right in to support his contention that they are phonies. ;D
 
They might be phoneys, but they get good ratings. I noticed Zigler updated his website to mention his commentaries on kgil and to bash boring bryan suits his replacement.. Hey, I agree with Zigler on something! Suits is boring...Zigler was too though, in my opinion..because by the time he got on they air his rush rehash was old, unless he had some local issue to chew on... Also if suits likes porn, as JZ contends, I wonder if he will be undressing his newsperson with his eyes?
 
mred said:
They might be phoneys, but they get good ratings. I noticed Zigler updated his website to mention his commentaries on kgil and to bash boring bryan suits his replacement.. Hey, I agree with Zigler on something! Suits is boring...Zigler was too though, in my opinion..because by the time he got on they air his rush rehash was old, unless he had some local issue to chew on... Also if suits likes porn, as JZ contends, I wonder if he will be undressing his newsperson with his eyes?
Click to expand...

You are right on now. I never said that J & K weren't commanding radio. For the same reason we ogle car wrecks on the freeway and love train wrecks and airplane crashes on the news, we tune in to John and Ken. Ziegler was at his most extreme level of boredom when he was defending Bush a la Limbaugh. Rush is so much better at that and Zig was just rehashing the same old stuff. His best and, it was very good, were his interviews and his commentaries on local issues which to me was the justification for live and local, else why not rerun Rush?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom