A station's success does NOT depend on ratings. It has NOTHING to do with a number with Arbitron. It IS revenue (you know, making money). Different companies have different budgets and different goals. So you can't judge one station from another. These "small" stations either ARE or have the POTENTIAL to give a return on investment, either through spot sales or the simply value of the license. Having a license does NOT obligate the owner to make a showing in Arbitron, which a very flawed unscientific rating process anyway. And I am not the ONLY one who thinks this, so I don't want to hear that I am disgruntled for not showing. I operate on REVENUE, not RATINGS... Mr. Mays with Clear Channel, the larget group operator in the USA thinks the same. Clear Channel is looking into ratings alternatives. Need links, just ask, I'll post them. yes ratings can have a bearing on revenue...but THAT is not what determines whether a company will make their share holders happy.
Also, with your line of thinking, thousands of stations across the country should be shut down because they are not in a rated market, thus have no ratings.
> Sometimes the things you don't see are pretty interesting
> too. The lowest rated station in the latest Hartford book
> had a .4 rating. That equates to about 4100 listeners in
> the average quarter hour.
>
> The following Hartford area stations couldn't even get
> listed....
>
> WNTY - 990 - Southington
> WMRD - 1150 - Middletown
> WKND - 1230 - Manchester
> WTMI - 1290 - West Hartford
> WNEZ - 1480 - Windsor
> WDZK - 1550 - Bloomfield
>
> Just for the sake of energy conservation these stations
> should go dark.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>