T
TheJudge
Guest
I know we have a rule on this board that we can't
quote actual ratings numbers so that's why my message
below sounds a little obtuse.
But... I'm assuming that the final number for the
Summer '05 book is the average of the ratings in the
three parts of the book. Is that correct? If not,
ignore the rest of this message.
But if so....
If you look at the trends in the first two parts of
the Hartford summer '05 book, you'll find that a
couple of stations took a huge nosedive in the third
part of the book in order to arrive at their final
numbers.
WDRC-FM, which usually got a nice summer boost when
they were Oldies, looks like they held steady with the
Spring '05 book. But compare that final number to
the trend numbers in Parts 1 & 2 and it means that they
had to take a 33% dive in Part 3.
WTIC-FM, which was trending severly downward in Parts
1 & 2 had to have taken almost a 70% dive in Part 3 to
get to their final number.
quote actual ratings numbers so that's why my message
below sounds a little obtuse.
But... I'm assuming that the final number for the
Summer '05 book is the average of the ratings in the
three parts of the book. Is that correct? If not,
ignore the rest of this message.
But if so....
If you look at the trends in the first two parts of
the Hartford summer '05 book, you'll find that a
couple of stations took a huge nosedive in the third
part of the book in order to arrive at their final
numbers.
WDRC-FM, which usually got a nice summer boost when
they were Oldies, looks like they held steady with the
Spring '05 book. But compare that final number to
the trend numbers in Parts 1 & 2 and it means that they
had to take a 33% dive in Part 3.
WTIC-FM, which was trending severly downward in Parts
1 & 2 had to have taken almost a 70% dive in Part 3 to
get to their final number.