• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Has anyone seen this before?

Here's my guess: 2003 was about the last translator window. There were tons of applications. I think the FCC still has some of those applications to resolve. If I recall correctly, there were a few that filed for hundreds and a couple that filed for thousands of translators. The FCC, I think, put a freeze on approving them at some point to permit other filing windows for other classes of FM stations. I believe they went to some of the applicants that filed so many applications to see if they'd narrow their number of applications.

I figured these had been resolved by now. It is possible these are ghost applications, ones that never got approved and never got dismissed. When you're dealing with so much going on, a few will always slip through the cracks. Then again, if the AM translator window is done and completed, if the applications you show actually still work, they might be approved.

If I recall correctly, one ministry filed for something like 2,500 translators in that window. There was the question whether the ministry had the needed funds to build them all if granted. Naturally, the thinking was file for everything you can and if you wind up with 1 in 10 getting approved, it was a good deal. I recall one big ministry agreeing to drop 80% of their applications when the FCC asked if they could narrow the list.

You can bet that 80% was for places they didn't want but any that got approved became applications they could trade for places where they wanted a translator. Lots of trading takes place. The thinking is get all you can anywhere you can and after the FCC is done you can trade them for what you actually want. I recall in the last NCE FM filing window this Spanish language ministry in San Antonio got a station in a place with zero Hispanics in their 60 dbu. Meanwhile an English language applicant got a station in a Texas community where Spanish was the preferred language although most were bilingual. There was a swap...no money changing hands just station applications.
 
It looks like the FCC said yes to Juan (2nd app) and no to Katherine (1st app).

Sorry Katherine. But then again what's wrong with a little foreign integration? LOL I guess we can expect a new station in Austin on 107.9.
 
It looks like the FCC said yes to Juan (2nd app) and no to Katherine (1st app).

Sorry Katherine. But then again what's wrong with a little foreign integration? LOL I guess we can expect a new station in Austin on 107.9.

Foreign?

People with names like Juan have been in Texas for over a century longer than those named Katherine. So “Juan” is hardly “foreign” and your comment is highly inappropriate.
 
Sorry if it seemed racist. I have just seen a lot of stuff against Juan Alberto Ayala before by other reputable broadcasters. But maybe he's an American native.
 
Sorry if it seemed racist. I have just seen a lot of stuff against Juan Alberto Ayala before by other reputable broadcasters. But maybe he's an American native.

The only "American Natives" are the indigenous peoples who trace their ancestry to the crossing of the Bering Straits many millennia ago.

60% of US Hispanics are born US citizens, so making assumptions about nationality and immigration status based on names is perilous.
 


The only "American Natives" are the indigenous peoples who trace their ancestry to the crossing of the Bering Straits many millennia ago..

Those are "Native Americans," the peoples whom, in less enlightened times, we used to call "American Indians."

An "American native" can be anyone born in the United States at any time, including two minutes ago. You could make it "U.S. native" if you don't like "America" being used as a synonym for one country on the North American continent, but there is nothing essentially wrong with "American native" the way AnyHuman used it in his last post.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom