• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Has streaming quality reached its (possibly mandated) highest plateau?

Chuck said:
AMradiofan said:
Soundexchange is actually easy to deal with, have real people to talk-to, and are easier-going than the "big 3."

I believe the example quoted a few posts ago is not (small market) typical. The numbers given would imply 200 listeners 24/7 all year, never any less. This is NEVER the case. Listeners come and go. Small market stations can afford a properly selected streaming service with proper sales planning, because the streaming is an extra service used when (the listener is) NOT in range, or in a place where private listening is the only option. And, it gives small stations the chance to compete with the big boys where portability, branding, and service is concerned!

If we had that 200 listener 24/7 scenario described a bit earlier, as our engineer put it, "We would easily have a few hundred thousand dollars income from advertisers banging down our door and throwing money at us." I tend to agree. If you're that popular as an OTA broadcaster, you've got the advertising dollars and you won't be worrying.
The example I gave is real, but to clarify, I said an average of 200 listeners, which means sometimes it would naturally be less, but sometimes it would be more. I am an OTA broadcaster in an Arbitron rated market, but not one of the bigger ones. Think somewhere between market 100 and 200. We did become that popular on the Internet. But let's say you only averaged 100 listeners, that is still $23,000. Can you really sell enough ads to pay for that with only an average of 100 listeners? More power to you if you can.

I'm going to risk answering some of these points and not being liked. I've lived with my station 24/7 for nearly a decade after years working for someone else. It's working, and I'll spell it out. It IS hard work, and it IS NOT easy, but we're proud of the sound, signal, sales, and service we provide. ]In a tiny, unrated market, we sold $10k's worth of streaming sponsorships in a specially designed "package" of on-air announcements for the year. That much was sold the very first day we debuted streaming. The clients are excited about the streaming product and having their businesses associated with it. 6 month commitment minimum to be "on. Plus, we don't sell anything ONLY on the stream: that would create another (digital) revenue stream on which stations are charged royalties. ALL revenue is on the actual terrestrial signal and the stream is 100 percent duplicate of our air signal."

Perhaps you have an unrealistic idea of how challenging it is to sell advertising. It's hard enough to sell over the air radio, much less the Internet.

Really? Sounds like you're shooting yourself down before you start! I'm not saying it's easy.....but you proceed from a false assumption! We bought a station that was off the air, dead for nearly a year and with two weeks to license revocation, an AM standalone, with only 330 watts night power,no stream and no translator when bought.... brought it back and have survived 9 years, paid all the bills, and enlarged the AM daytime signal among other triumphs. Unrealistic idea of sales? We simply adjust to our market, know our town, and price things correctly!


According to Radio Locator, there are 36 stations vying for attention in my zip code. That means the advertising pie is sliced pretty thin. In many places, it is much worse than that.

Find your niche. Do what you do best. Stop worrying about other signals and make YOUR STATION the best it can be and MARKET IT. Your statement itself is setting yourself up for failure.

I'm lucky. I have great sponsors, many of whom have been with us for years, but they aren't particularly impressed with how many Internet listeners we have.

It's all in how you present it and how you VIEW it. Our sponsors wanted the streaming SERVICE to be provided and to help put OUR TOWN on the map! They like that idea! NOBODY asks us how many total listeners are on the stream, or about (terrestrial) ratings. We're an unrated market, and our clients are excited to be HEARD on our stream within driving distance for the potential of seeing new faces. Many towns are now logging in within an hour or so of our station (outside our primary coverage area) and are listening regularly...proving they have interest, and may even make a "day trip" to our area for things that interest them they hear on the air. Remember, you're also selling your TOWN and your advertisers TO those on the stream,

As for the cost of streaming being insignificant to an OTA broadcaster, evidently you don't have to meet payroll, pay employment taxes, pay commercial property tax, pay tower rent, pay a large electric bill, deal with various governmental agencies, replace expensive equipment when lightning strikes your tower, etc. It is relatively expensive to operate a commercial broadcast station. Sure, you can make money, but the profit margins aren't as big as most people think they are.

Um, yes we do We're OTA, AM stand alone, in a small market. It CAN work. We don't get rich, but we've paid all our bills for nearly 9 years, starting from nothing, no accounts, no ads, no clients, no programming, no web presence, no logo, nothing. Streaming is a nice NEW service, and people are EXCITED about having our own app, too, not just on their laptop and PC screens. We INVESTED in having the service for our listeners and advertisers.

If you've been successful selling your Internet stream, I'd love to hear how you do it. Really :)

Re-read the above, then start by not giving yourself so many reasons to NOT do things and sounding so down on your own station!
Look at what's possible and do WHAT YOU CAN, stop putting up hurdles. You sound defeated in your posting. Please try to look at your station's potential...not the things you believe you CAN'T do. I have my days where I curse, too...but I'm still in radio, still in the drivers' seat of three very nice small market stations, and still having fun overall...and so is my sales staff! I promised them no complaints on teh street about our station, and they've had none. They ENJOY the creative selling ideas we concoct together..whether its streaming, special programming, feature shows, or standard commercial flights. I hope the same happens for you.
 
AMradiofan said:
Re-read the above, then start by not giving yourself so many reasons to NOT do things and sounding so down on your own station!
Look at what's possible and do WHAT YOU CAN, stop putting up hurdles. You sound defeated in your posting. Please try to look at your station's potential...not the things you believe you CAN'T do. I have my days where I curse, too...but I'm still in radio, still in the drivers' seat of three very nice small market stations, and still having fun overall...and so is my sales staff! I promised them no complaints on teh street about our station, and they've had none. They ENJOY the creative selling ideas we concoct together..whether its streaming, special programming, feature shows, or standard commercial flights. I hope the same happens for you.

I'm not at all down on radio, and I don't mean to sound like my friend David Eduardo. I enjoy being in radio, and I'm sure you do too. I just want people to go into it with their eyes wide open. You need a business plan that is attainable. Over the years, I've tried a lot of new ideas, and found that some worked, and some didn't. It isn't a cakewalk, and it certainly isn't a licence to print money.

By the way, we still stream, but to keep it going, I had to commit Internet Suicide. That involved changing our name, web site and streaming IP address. Since nobody can find us now, we once again qualify as a "Small Internet Broadcaster" and that is something I can afford to do. Of course, instead of having 200 listeners, we now have 30-40. The down side is we may grow out of that niche. That shouldn't be a "downside." I'm sure it will take some time for it to happen, but it is likely to do so at some point. Tell me, how would you pay Sound Exchange $43,000 a year or so? Can you sell that many spots with an average of 200 listeners? If you can, you are very good. I mean that as a compliment. But I doubt that everyone can do that.

I'm happy you are enthusiastic about streaming. I suspect it is our future, but right now, the economic model isn't really sustainable for most small to mid size commercial radio broadcasters. That's why a lot of them don't stream. As it is, a commercial over the air broadcaster pays a lot more for the privileged than somebody running an Internet station out of their bedroom. Is that really fair?

So do you make money out of your streaming? How much? Just wondering. I'd be happy to hear how you do it. Perhaps you can teach an old dog a few new tricks.
 
AMradiofan said:
Woaw! Let's keep this thing from going to the "dark" side and insults.

Personally, as a radio station owner, who operates a stream, I'm thankful for my "long distance" listeners. They choose OUR station over others (their locals) when on our stream, and that, first of all is a compliment. Secondly, they reinforce and ENDORSE the fact that our steam is something different than they have locally, and they choose it for a reason, thus validating our efforts as good programmers and owners.

No, far away listeners won't drive from Washington State or Canada for a brew at my local pub the Lamplight Grill, but...listeners on the web in driving distance but out of my terrestrial range may visit my town, and they have!

I value the OPINION of my distant listeners to the station, and the POTENTIAL of those in driving distance to visit our advertisers.
It is not beyond the realm of possibility for them to come an hour or more for something they believe is worthwhile.

Quite the debate going on here.

AMradiofan - I think your station sounds good. I think the lack of high frequency (the nature of AM Stereo) helps the overall sound. As for some of the comments regarding the source you're using, I tend to agree with others. From my experience it tends to be a better idea to use source audio into a dedicated DSP. I tend to go less than more when it comes to processing, primarily because the AAC codec looks for information to disregard. That becomes difficult when source audio is processed for broadcast.

What sounds good on air doesn't always sound good online.

Regardless, if it ain't broke don't fix it. If you're happy and you're listeners like it than you've found your "signature sound". Best Wishes :)
 
We thank you! I think it is a "signature" sound, and some very well versed engineers call the OTA C-quam AM stereo the best since
the days of it being deployed at WJR, CFCO and others.

Thanks for the kind words. The AM stereo stream does exactly what we wanted. Shows AM's potential to people not getting it OTA that way, and puts our station on the radar of many folks via many public relations venues.
 
AMradiofan said:
We thank you! I think it is a "signature" sound, and some very well versed engineers call the OTA C-quam AM stereo the best since
the days of it being deployed at WJR, CFCO and others.

Thanks for the kind words. The AM stereo stream does exactly what we wanted. Shows AM's potential to people not getting it OTA that way, and puts our station on the radar of many folks via many public relations venues.

We seem to have a lot more in common than perhaps either of us realized. My AM station's transmitter (A BE AM-1A) has a slot for a C-quam card. It is empty right now, but as soon as I find the card at a fair price, I'll join you in the "AM Stereo Revolution." :)
 
I hope you do (find one) and I hope you do (activate it.)
Proper processing final is a must! But, it'll sound great.

I like your words "AM Stereo revolution."
Funny, it could be one now...and wasn't years ago.
But then, digital hadn't been shoved down everyone's throats, either.
 
AMradiofan,

This has been a great discussion and I have found a few (fine) new stations to listen to. Sometimes I am in the Detroit area on business and will try to drive out to see you like the guy from CT said he wanted to. I'd love to see that Carver in person!....and of course, you too!

AM in cars is not too good anymore and I have an HD radio. AM sounds kind of (actually very) weird in HD, but that's probably due to low bit rate or something. One thing I think when I listen to my AM HD stations in Philly though.... Music may actually sound good in HD AM in a weird way. Some things about the compression in AM HD are not too good for voice, but have some harmonics that I think would sound good at higher volumes for music. Two questions:

1) does WION broadcast in HD?
2) Regarding your 128 AAC stream. How does it sound in a side by side comparison with your AM broadcast? I am assuming there is very little "artifact" distortion. How does the overall sound compare? In other words, when I listen to the WION AM stream, how close is it to the actual AM broadcast on a system such as your Carver? 90%, 85%....100%???
 
One thing I was wondering.....Is sound quality mandated anywhere to be of lesser quality for broadcasts? Original question was wondering this....Someone could theoretically stream a CD utilizing a very high bit rate I'm sure...... but I have never found such a stream???? Hence the "mandated" part of the question.....
 
Bobf said:
One thing I was wondering.....Is sound quality mandated anywhere to be of lesser quality for broadcasts? Original question was wondering this....Someone could theoretically stream a CD utilizing a very high bit rate I'm sure...... but I have never found such a stream???? Hence the "mandated" part of the question.....
I don't believe anything is mandated, Most web streams are what they are because of limitations of the internet and it's associated costs. Higher quality means more bandwidth and higher cost. Let's not forget that not everyone has a great Internet connection. A lot of people listen on a smartphone, where 128 kbs can be a problem. I'm sure there are some people who still have dial up, where 32 kbs can be a challenge. A CD is 16 bit linear (uncompressed) PCM audio. They are huge files, which would be a challenge for most people to receive with current Internet technology.
 
AMradiofan said:
I hope you do (find one) and I hope you do (activate it.)
Proper processing final is a must! But, it'll sound great.

It is on the shopping list. The AM station has been a bit of a "restoration project," but it is improving. I have an Omnia 1 processor on it and it sounds "nostalgic" but pretty good. I'm just always looking for better.

AMradiofan said:
I like your words "AM Stereo revolution."
Funny, it could be one now...and wasn't years ago.
But then, digital hadn't been shoved down everyone's throats, either.

There could be. I think the writing is on the wall that AM stations need to become inventive if they are going to survive. Making them sound better is one step toward doing that. I'm actually seeing some enthusiasm about revitalizing AM. As you say, that didn't seem to be there just a year ago.

A lot of larger broadcasters have decided that small AM's aren't worth the trouble. As a result, they sometimes sell them off at fire-sale prices. That opens the door for entrepreneurial operators to acquire them and actually do something with them. For way too long AM stations have been relegated to being little more than a satellite dish rebroadcasting a feed from some far away place. For people willing to turn them back into the local resources they once were, I think there is a sustainable future.
 
Bobf said:
AMradiofan,

This has been a great discussion and I have found a few (fine) new stations to listen to. Sometimes I am in the Detroit area on business and will try to drive out to see you like the guy from CT said he wanted to. I'd love to see that Carver in person!....and of course, you too!

AM in cars is not too good anymore and I have an HD radio. AM sounds kind of (actually very) weird in HD, but that's probably due to low bit rate or something. One thing I think when I listen to my AM HD stations in Philly though.... Music may actually sound good in HD AM in a weird way. Some things about the compression in AM HD are not too good for voice, but have some harmonics that I think would sound good at higher volumes for music. Two questions:

1) does WION broadcast in HD?
1a) No, we don't. Don't like the limited bandwidth provided, and the splatter to other stations, let alone, licensing bucks going to Clear Channel (investors in Ibiquity.)

2) Regarding your 128 AAC stream. How does it sound in a side by side comparison with your AM broadcast?
I am assuming there is very little "artifact" distortion. How does the overall sound compare? In other words, when I listen to the WION AM stream, how close is it to the actual AM broadcast on a system such as your Carver? 90%, 85%....100%???

2a) We stream from an on-site tuner in the owner's office, so terrestrial interference of most kinds unless huge is nonexistent. Thus, at least 98 percent would be our engineer's take on that question. We're using a "pro" broadcasting sound card to feed the web as well. Assuming you are using the HQ stream, not the one commonly used by phone apps.

Thanks for the interest and your questions!
 
Chuck said:
A lot of larger broadcasters have decided that small AM's aren't worth the trouble. As a result, they sometimes sell them off at fire-sale prices. That opens the door for entrepreneurial operators to acquire them and actually do something with them. For way too long AM stations have been relegated to being little more than a satellite dish rebroadcasting a feed from some far away place. For people willing to turn them back into the local resources they once were, I think there is a sustainable future.

I assume you mean one lung stations (1Kw's)?
 
stewie said:
I assume you mean one lung stations (1Kw's)?

Not just 1 KW station, although those are usually the cheapest. If you get one, try to pair it with an FM translator or two. There's really quite a lot of stations available if you look.
 
Bobf said:
AMradiofan,

This has been a great discussion and I have found a few (fine) new stations to listen to. Sometimes I am in the Detroit area on business and will try to drive out to see you like the guy from CT said he wanted to. I'd love to see that Carver in person!....and of course, you too!
Just an update... I am actually going to WION this Friday. Can't wait to check it out!

I honestly don't think there is another station out there quite like this station.
 
Sorry for not replying back when I got back, I have been busy since getting back.

What a station and setup. If there is anyone looking to setup and model a radio station after another it should be this station.

WION even used its RDS on its FM signal to welcome me into town!

I posted a bunch of pics on the WION forum at http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/315823-A-look-at-WION
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom