Xperi is positioning its proprietary system to be a leading player in what it calls the "digital transition" of Indian radio.
The real elephant in that room is the fact that All India Radio already adopted for full national coverage in multiple languages the DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale) system and is already through the first phase of adopting the system, consisting of many high power regional and major metro transmitters.Xperi is positioning its proprietary system to be a leading player in what it calls the "digital transition" of Indian radio.
Any chance that some US broadcasters might adopt all digital HD on AM with the same kind of regional broadcast goals? I realize that the US radio market is probably different than broadcast in India. The consumer uptake of HD capable AM receivers is also a key issue. It seems like there might be some advantages in cost of broadcast infrastructure however.The real elephant in that room is the fact that All India Radio already adopted for full national coverage in multiple languages the DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale) system and is already through the first phase of adopting the system, consisting of many high power regional and major metro transmitters.
India wanted a system suitable for the AM band so that they could get large regional coverage without the need for thousands of transmitters such as with the European digital system or the restrictions of the coverage of the FM band.
It's a bandwidth issue. For AM in the U.S. you're limited to 10kHz. Can't multicast multiple stations in such limited real estate.Any chance that some US broadcasters might adopt all digital HD on AM with the same kind of regional broadcast goals?
All HD radios currently being sold are already capable of receiving AM-HD or full digital-MA3 mode.I realize that the US radio market is probably different than broadcast in India. The consumer uptake of HD capable AM receivers is also a key issue.
I've seen shootouts of both HD-MA3 and DRM. For coverage and ease of receive capture/decoding at MW frequencies, DRM is slightly better. The main issue is receiver availability. Ibquity/Xperi have a jump on that front, since it was the chosen standard.Which would have better signal coverage from an AM station, DRM or HD,
or does the wide range of receiver types make this an impossible question?
And, in India, AIR owns the AM band and they can reallocate to fit their needs. In the Western Hemisphere, the band is far more occupied and there would be no way to duplicate channels for each station to add a DRM channel.DRM doesn't support the hybrid operation mode ("sidebands") that HD Radio does - but the Indians are using "combined" transmitters on AM to provide both AM and DRM services on adjacent channels. In Delhi, they run DRM on 810kHz and AM on 819, for instance.
Meanwhile at the beginning of 2022 All India Radio shut down all but one of its remaining domestic shortwave outlets. There used to be a lot of these, but the huge expansion of FM in the country as well as upgraded AM and DRM signals has made SW unnecessary.The real elephant in that room is the fact that All India Radio already adopted for full national coverage in multiple languages the DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale) system and is already through the first phase of adopting the system, consisting of many high power regional and major metro transmitters.
India wanted a system suitable for the AM band so that they could get large regional coverage without the need for thousands of transmitters such as with the European digital system or the restrictions of the coverage of the FM band.
One could run DRM on SW too. But since SW went to 'ghost town' status 20 years ago, there wasn't any point of pursuing the transition.Meanwhile at the beginning of 2022 All India Radio shut down all but one of its remaining domestic shortwave outlets. There used to be a lot of these, but the huge expansion of FM in the country as well as upgraded AM and DRM signals has made SW unnecessary.