• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

HD Radio awareness stagnates

Most of us have suspected it but now Inside Radio makes it official.

"Even though millions of dollars have been spent promoting HD Radio, less than one-third of Americans are aware of what it is. A new study concludes 29% of consumers say they’re familiar with HD Radio."

http://www.insideradio.com/topheadline.asp?ID=563421&PT=Today's+Top+Stories

By contrast, only 3% are unprepared for the DTV transition. The vast majority of Americans are aware of and ready for HDTV. So what will it take for HD Radio? A government mandated transition?

C5
 
...and then we have Jerry Del C.'s take on why HD Radio is going nowhere:

"If the industry ever had any doubts it was out of touch with consumers, just look to the fraud perpetrated on the public by the radio industry over HD radio. No programming to justify the consumer's price for acquiring the radio.No commitment from the major groups other than running HD radio ads. Lousy reception."

http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com/

Here Jerry contrasts radio and record's slump with Apple's 9% growth in a bad economic time. Having products (or content) the public wants makes all the difference.

C5
 
Where I work we launched a new FM signal. The technology is new and start of the art.. What ever that means..

But I can tell you while listening on my standard car radio, in my Chevrolet HHR, I could clearly hear music with high notes, great stereo separation and deep base. I doubt HD would sound much better. Best of all, my radio doesn't take seconds while booting up.. LOL And I don't have to purchase another stupid radio..

"No programming to justify the consumer's price for acquiring the radio.No commitment from the major groups other than running HD radio ads. Lousy reception."

Why would anyone want this.. Except of course for radio, they think this is great!
 
I was in Dallas today, a city that is a "hotbed' of HD activity. There are a lot of HD stations on the air.

While in town, I visited the Fry's store on East Northwest Highway. They had three HD radios on display in the "table radio" area. I'm sure there were others in "car stereos" and probably a few more scattered around the store. Fry's is not the most organized store I've ever visited. The cheapest HD radio I saw was $199. They went up to $599 for the Polk Audio version. By contrast, across the aisle from the HD radios was a display of Internet Radios. There were ten of them from a variety of manufacturers. The cheapest was a clock radio (which also had AM-FM) for $79.95. Most were it the $150 range. The most expensive one I saw, a Sangean, was $249.00, if I recall correctly.

This was by no means an accurate survey. As a visitor who was shopping for something completely different, I may have missed something. But to the casual observer, it appears to me that Internet Radio is winning the battle for digital radio. Stores tend to stock items that sell well.

I know for a fact that Internet listenership to my own station is up about 50% in the last six months. What has caused that remains a mystery, but off hand, I'd guess that the public is accepting the idea of Internet Radio.
 
Chuck said:
I was in Dallas today, a city that is a "hotbed' of HD activity. There are a lot of HD stations on the air.

While in town, I visited the Fry's store on East Northwest Highway. They had three HD radios on display in the "table radio" area. I'm sure there were others in "car stereos" and probably a few more scattered around the store. Fry's is not the most organized store I've ever visited. The cheapest HD radio I saw was $199. They went up to $599 for the Polk Audio version. By contrast, across the aisle from the HD radios was a display of Internet Radios. There were ten of them from a variety of manufacturers. The cheapest was a clock radio (which also had AM-FM) for $79.95. Most were it the $150 range. The most expensive one I saw, a Sangean, was $249.00, if I recall correctly.

This was by no means an accurate survey. As a visitor who was shopping for something completely different, I may have missed something. But to the casual observer, it appears to me that Internet Radio is winning the battle for digital radio. Stores tend to stock items that sell well.

I know for a fact that Internet listenership to my own station is up about 50% in the last six months. What has caused that remains a mystery, but off hand, I'd guess that the public is accepting the idea of Internet Radio.

This compares with what I have found at my local Best Buy store, a total of four HD Radio products.

As I see it, it's a perfect storm of factors that have worked against HD Radio, beginning with the name. There is so much confusion surrounding HD; HDTV, HDMI, XMHD, HD audio, etc. Rather than the halo effect that iBiquity was hoping for, there is confusion, not to mention the added confusion of digital radio being equated with satellite radio. But people have no problem understanding the concept of internet radio and how to get it.

Second you have CE manufacturers who are giving, at best, tepid support for HD Radio. Of the 18 models of receivers that Yamaha makes, only four have HD Radio. However nearly all of them offer either LAN or Bluetooth connectivity, making it a breeze to connect a PC, iPhone or iPod Touch or similar device to, what is essentially, an entertainment center. Again, this makes it easy to listen to internet radio. And, of course, nearly everyone has a PC or pocket PC-type device so there is nothing more to buy (like an HD tuner).

Then you have the technical problems associated with HD Radio, namely poor or inconsistent reception.

Finally you have the radio industry itself which has, as Jerry points out, for the most part abandoned those who still listen to radio particularly boomers and older. Fortunately for us boomers, we're just tech savvy enough to log onto internet radio and indulge in any format we want, including formats of the past that have been kicked to the curb by corporate commercial radio and rarely heard on public radio.

So I would say it is a combination of neglect, tech problems, bad timing and confusion that are dooming HD Radio to the bin of forgotten technology. RIP.

C5
 
KB1OKL said:
"Hotbed of HD activity", now that is an oxymoron if I've ever heard one. :D
There was some tongue-in-cheek intent to my statement, but Dallas really does have a lot of HD radio signals, far more than most cities. Some of the secondary channels even offer formats that you might not ever see on the standard broadcast band (Why? is another issue). If HD is going to get a lot of market acceptance, it will do it in Dallas.

For that matter, Dallas has an amazing amount of radio signals. Radio-Locator shows 58 "nearby" signals for my old zip code. That number would vary from location to location, since the DFW Metroplex takes a couple of hours just to drive through it. It is a very large area.

Many of those "nearby" stations are indeed very close neighbors to other stations. You'd be hard pressed to find many clear channels to play your ipod on. They exist, but the surely don't protect third adjacent channels, and probably not second adjacent channels either. If everyone lights up with IBOC, and the FCC gives the go ahead for a 10db HD power increase, the party in the DFW area should be very interesting.
 
Interesting survey from Jacobs Media on the most desired features in a car stereo:

http://www.fmqb.com/article.asp?id=1294756

The top three are: AM/FM radio, CD Player and iPod connectivity in that order. How does satellite and HD Radio rate?

"Satellite and HD Radio fared much lower with 16 percent and 9 percent saying they are very important."

Yes, only 9% of respondents considered HD Radio important. But the good news (or is this a good news-good news situation) is that AM/FM radio still rates #1 as a must have for in-dash stereos.

C5
 
As a follow up to this thread, there was an interesting article by Ken Dardis entitled: "At What Point Will Radio Respond With Action?" (5/22)

Of particular note is his observation on HD Radio:

"Have you noticed the lack of mention regarding HD Radio lately? I'm not hearing any commercials for it on Cleveland stations....HD Radio has already become a past-tense issue in this town. (I recently asked a BMW service manager about the sale of HD Radios at his dealership. His exact words: "I've never had a request for one.""

You can read his essay here:

http://www.audiographics.com/agd/052209-1.htm

C5
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom