Re: HD Radio Dead
> As I suspected. It's not quite fair to call it
> "High Distortion" when you haven't driven around
> listening to how good it actually sounds.
Jokes aren't supposed to be fair, especially when you take them literally.
> Don't let the specs fool you - it's better than
> normal FM in many ways. I'm not defending the
> content, but the technology isn't bad at all.
It's also worse than normal FM in many ways, such as when you're trying to listen to the NYC stations in Trenton. Thanks to IBOC, for the most part this is no longer possible. One of the few exceptions is 106.7 WLTW, because 106.9 WKDN isn't transmitting the digital hash (yet).
> I also agree that the receiver manufacturers
> are only going to give this so much time, like
> they did with AM Stereo.
If you compare the first few years of AM Stereo to the first few years of IBOC, AM Stereo was a blazing success in comparison to IBOC. In 1986, 30% of all new cars came with AM Stereo-capable radios. In 2006, the amount of new cars with IBOC-capable radios is so small that it isn't even measurable. In fact, the amount of new cars and trucks with AM Stereo-capable radios today still drastically outnumbers the amount of new vehicles with IBOC! If IBOC is being so badly beaten in the marketplace by a system which people like you declared "dead" 15 years ago, then what hope is there for it!?
<P ID="signature">______________
"This is the New York Emergency Broadcast System satellite channel. They took the crosstown bus."</P>