SUPERCASTER said:You keep repeating the obvious, but never answer the real question about where the radio broadcasters obligation to the public for the use of their airwaves is factored into the equation.
I already said that the terms of a license require service to the local community. There is no expressed FCC requirement to serve the fringe coverage areas.
According to your view, inner city urban coverage,
I did not say that. I said that stations served the local community, which is often considered to be the OMB defined metro of which the city of license forms part. Very few serve, other than indirectly, areas beyond the metro coverage area.
and pursuit of profits is pretty much all we can expect from broadcasters,
Again: without income, a station can not serve anyone.
with only an occasional nod to public service, as a tiny afterthought.
I'd like to hear your definition of "public service." I have a suspicion that you do not find "relaxing music that makes my workday go better" would not be service to you. What is?
Perhaps at license renewal we need to reassign the whole commercial broadcast spectrum to new, more public spirited, less greed driven broadcasters, and eliminate the HD radio jamming at the same time.
Perhaps you will explain how stations will exist if they don't make at least enough money to justify the investment?