7
700WLW
Guest
DavidEduardo said:700WLW said:Mike Walker said:If that same logic had been followed in, say, 1923 (why broadcast, there are no radios?) or in 1947 for tv, would there be a broadcasting industry? Chicken, or egg? It makes no big difference...but ONE OF 'EM has to come first!
Back then, they probably didn't have the IBOC-type outrageous fees to recoup.
The fee, as a percentage of station revenue, is almost insignificant.
"HD isn't just for TV anymore"
"Minnesota Public Radio first launched HD Radio in the Twin Cities market in June 2005 and recently expanded to Collegeville, Fargo-Moorhead and Rochester. It plans to bring HD to all of its Minnesota listeners within the next five years, costing $7.2 million. The conversion is contingent on the membership-driven broadcaster raising the necessary funds through donations and government grants... The company estimates it will cost between $100,000 and $150,000 per station, General Manager John Sowada said... Many radio manufacturers have not gone HD, Laudenbach said, and attention around HR radios has been derailed by satellite radio and other technology. Local retailers said HD Radio has been slow to catch on and some question if the technology will take off."
http://www.sctimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070205/NEWS01/102050060/1009/RSS
There are also, software/hardware upgrade fees and percentage-fees for the HD channels - good-luck, recouping the initial and on-going outrageous fees, with no one listening !