I can get a somewhat usable signal from KRTH here in El Cajon (actually about a couple miles south of there). No trace of their HD-2, though. KIIS is blocked by KLQV's IBOC, though. KBIG can also be heard here.
Oh.... you mean the
HD versions of those stations! Well... I can't comment on those, as I don't have a HD radio..... but.... I will say that in my opinion, if you can get even a slight, 0.000001% chance of getting the carrier of a signal transmitting ultra-narrowband QRSS CW, even if you have to use a spectrum analyzer, computer, recording of the signal, etc, to be able to tell that anything's even there at all... in my opinion the same field strength should be able to provide a 100% usable, full-quality digital signal, assuming you're using the same receive antenna in both cases. I do realize, though, that HD's performance is nowhere near that good, unfortunately.

What would it take (including switching to a completely different digital system) to be able to do that? (Also I'd want to be able to have multiple streams on the same frequency (the stations could transmit control codes that a radio could use to switch from one to another, maybe), and not interfere with analog transmissions on the same frequency. You would be able to stand almost right next to the tower of a 100kW digital signal with an analog radio, and it would not interfere at all with a weak analog signal that's 1.5dB above the atmospheric noise level on the same frequency. That same digital signal, when using an analog radio, would have a 100% full quality signal all the way out to where the above-mentioned QRSS CW analog signal would be... well... probably pretty far below the noise. (I've heard 3kHz sine-wave tones buried 30-36dB or so below audio white noise, and I suspect QRSS CW can be detected by professionals/hams at much worse signal levels.)
I can't comment on the actual HD quality of those stations where I am, but at this time I have no plans to purchase a HD radio in its current incarnation, as I know I'll be sorely disappointed. (I'd almost like to go so far with my expectations as to require a signal that could be briefly received via e-skip for like 5 seconds in your lifetime on analog... to be received 100% of the time in digital... but that's probably taking it too far.

)