Re: hd radio, the real story
> > > > That's because it isn't financially viable at this
> point
> >
> > > to
> > > > have on-air personalities. I have read articles that
> > state
> > >
> > > > that it's very possible later, like when HD becomes
> more
> >
> > > > well-known to the general public, that on-air
> > > personalities
> > > > will be hired.
> > > >
> > >
> > > More likely the main channel jocks will be told to VT
> > > it...for no extra money.
> > >
> > > Sorry guys, I just can't get excited about HD radio.
> Hope
> > > I'm wrong.
> > >
> > when they start the VT'ing, the trackers will be paid.
> > That's the way CC does it. You VT for another station, you
>
> > get paid. It may not be a lot, but it's money.
>
> Bill...I don't think they'll even have to voice track. Just
> pay somebody to do some liners, hook up the emergency alert
> system, run the spots for free on it to draw advertisers to
> the main channel. Basically, they get three or more stations
> for the price of one (which they're already paying for).
> That price includes labor, materials, utilities and etc.
> already.No additional lease, no additional insurance
> coverage, or anything.
>
> It's all about the Benjamins, and some may even end up with
> some sort of LMA, lease or franchise or something where they
> collect a certain amount and let whoever's paying them do
> whatever they like.
> If that happened...at least you might get some fun "pirate"
> type radio.
>
> In the end...I think this will be every bit as big a deal as
> AM STEREO.
> Man, do you remember how many of us rushed to buy THOSE
> recievers? Whooooo!
> >
>
i never could find one

<P ID="signature">______________
note to the NAB..satellite radio..its worth paying for!!</P>