I live in Rhode Island and just purchased my first HDTV yesterday. I love it! While setting it up I experimented to see if I could pull in some HDTV Boston signals with the rooftop antenna. It's not the greatest antenna though. It pulls in analog signals of Boston stations with some static. I thought that having HDTV would clear that up and I would get those stations crystal clear. But it looks like I was wrong. It seems that the analog signal has to be fairly strong for you to pick up it's digital counterpart. The only HDTV signal from Boston that I think I got was WSBK and WGBH. So I'm assuming that a snowy analog signal is a bad sign that will result in the TV not even picking up that stations HDTV signal. How good does reception have to be before you can get the HDTV signal? Is this possible with a good set of Rabbit ears if I am 40 or 50 miles away?
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
HDTV Reception Question
- Thread starter Skynet74
- Start date
Digital television can be very tricky. Keep in mind that most of these stations are on UHF channels between 14 and 51 (with some higher for now). As for me, I live in New Britain, CT near Hartford. WFSB-DT (CBS) channel 33 broadcasts from Avon Mountain with 1 million watts visual ERP. However, I still can't get an effective signal from them. I'm at the bottom of Walnut Hill, which is in the same direction as the mountain (north-northwest). Even a roof antenna won't help me with that (I've tried). However, my line-of-sight to New Haven is better, seeing as I get WTNH-DT (ABC) channel 10 from Madmere Mountain in Hamden with little trouble.
Also, please keep in mind that HDTV is simply another level of digital broadcasting. You need to have XXXX-DT, or digital television, available first...THEN we can talk about HDTV or multicasting.
Also, please keep in mind that HDTV is simply another level of digital broadcasting. You need to have XXXX-DT, or digital television, available first...THEN we can talk about HDTV or multicasting.
Most older TV antennas are combo's and most DTV is on UHF. I'm not a reception pro but I think U lose something on the UHF stations with the combo antennas. Maybe a UHF only antenna may do the trick for fringe UHF DTV reception. But as KML indicates, it's all about the topography. I would think if U can get the weaker Boston FM's at your location, you'll have no problem that can't be overcome.
I pick up 6 analog stations from Boston with my TV, but only one HDTV signal from Boston (WSBK 38). I've tried for hours tonight and my TV just isn't locking onto many HDTV signals over the air even when the analog signal looks OK. The TV is an Olevia. Perhaps these televisions have tuners that just plain suck. For some reason it seems like the analog station has to be near perfect reception for you to even get the HDTV signal.
I've heard some people say that they were able to pick up HDTV signals that their other TV's wouldn't. So it's looking to me like some tuners are just plain better than others. Some work when others don't.
I've heard some people say that they were able to pick up HDTV signals that their other TV's wouldn't. So it's looking to me like some tuners are just plain better than others. Some work when others don't.
vibe said:
For now. After Feb. 17, 2009, you'll see a lot of stations, especially those with high-VHF analog assignments, go back to the high-VHF location for their digital. In Texas, there are 30 high-VHF stations. Of those, one, KTRG 10 Del Rio, has no companion channel and will flash cut on channel 10. One station, KLST 8 San Angelo, is going with its DTV companion channel, but since that's channel 11, it is staying in high-VHF. Three other stations, KERA 13 Dallas, KLBK 13 Lubbock and KRBC 9 Abilene, are switching to their UHF DTV companion channels. The other 25 are all going back to their old high-VHF analog assignments.
N
Nizam
Guest
Are all the Boston stations broadcasting the Digital signal from the same location as the Analog is? I'm pretty sure that WLNE-TV's analog broadcasts from Tiverton, while the Digital is in Rehobeth, with the other TV stations there.
ssetta said:
It's an LCD. 37 inches. Black Friday sale at Target. Only $549. How could I pass up such a great deal. The HDTV picture really is beautiful! I don't know about Olevia being a cheap brand. I know that they are a new brand. I read an article that said ESPN has all Olevia monitors in their studio now. After reading many reviews people have said that this TV has a better picture than TV's costing twice as much. So I don't have an issue with the picture. My issue is that I can't pick up most Boston HDTV signals.
N
necrat123
Guest
If you are getting WSBK-DT, you should be easily getting most of the other Boston digitals.
WSBK-DT transmits from a common antenna with WBZ-DT, WCVB-DT, and WGBX-DT.
All four use the exact same antenna and are very close in DT channel assignments
(39, 30, 20, 43 respectivley). So I'm curious is something else is causing your lack of reception.
(Front end overload, bad tuner section, local interference... ?)
How about the Providence and nearby stations?
WSBK-DT transmits from a common antenna with WBZ-DT, WCVB-DT, and WGBX-DT.
All four use the exact same antenna and are very close in DT channel assignments
(39, 30, 20, 43 respectivley). So I'm curious is something else is causing your lack of reception.
(Front end overload, bad tuner section, local interference... ?)
How about the Providence and nearby stations?
necrat123 said:
WSBK comes in clearer on analog than any other Boston station. WHDH and WGBH are a close second. Followed by WCVB and then WBZ. WLVI is snowy and WFXT isn't being received on Analog at all. So I could understand if I couldn't get FOX 25's digital signal. That would make sense to me. But seeing that I pick up the Analog on all the other stations, I would expect to be able to receive the digital signal as well.
I get the following digital from Providence. WPRI, WJAR and WEATHER PLUS from them too. I also get WLNE in digital as well as WSBE. I do not get WLWC in digital, nor do I get Channel 69 (ION) in digital either. They just won't come in. I moved the antenna cable around a couple of times and the TV didn't pick up WLNE's digital signal even though I had a clear picture of the analog.
So considering all this data and all of the testing that I did, it just seems to me that my TV does not want to provide a digital picture unless I'm getting a perfect analog signal. This sucks because I was looking forward to getting a crystal clear picture of all the Boston stations that my cable company does not carry. However I'm not giving up yet. I will screw with some more settings later and see if I can make this work.
Skynet...
It's important to remember that the DTV signals are completely separate from the analog, so it's not a given that being able to get WXXX analog means you will be able to see WXXX-DT, or vice versa.
There are a bunch of factors at play here, including transmitter location (WLNE-DT and WSBE-DT are at transmitter sites far distant from their analog counterparts, for instance), power levels (not all "interim" digital signals are operating at full power), directional patterns and co- and adjacent-channel interference.
For instance, from over here in Rochester (NY, not MA!), I get a rock-solid picture from WSYT-DT 19 Syracuse, some 65 miles east of me. I get no picture at all from WNYS-DT 44, which operates at the same power level from the same site. As best I can figure it out, the problem is a combination of a different directional pattern on the WNYS-DT antenna and the presence, less than a mile away, of local WROC-DT on channel 45, just up the dial.
In your case, it could be WSBE-DT on 21 wreaking havoc with WCVB-DT on 20, just to offer one example.
It also sounds as though you just simply don't have very much signal level from the Route 128 tower farm to begin with (snowy analog signals), in which case you MIGHT benefit from a higher-gain outdoor antenna with a preamp. My experience so far with preamps on digital UHF is that they're not always the best solution, especially if you're near local signals that can overload them.
It's important to remember that the DTV signals are completely separate from the analog, so it's not a given that being able to get WXXX analog means you will be able to see WXXX-DT, or vice versa.
There are a bunch of factors at play here, including transmitter location (WLNE-DT and WSBE-DT are at transmitter sites far distant from their analog counterparts, for instance), power levels (not all "interim" digital signals are operating at full power), directional patterns and co- and adjacent-channel interference.
For instance, from over here in Rochester (NY, not MA!), I get a rock-solid picture from WSYT-DT 19 Syracuse, some 65 miles east of me. I get no picture at all from WNYS-DT 44, which operates at the same power level from the same site. As best I can figure it out, the problem is a combination of a different directional pattern on the WNYS-DT antenna and the presence, less than a mile away, of local WROC-DT on channel 45, just up the dial.
In your case, it could be WSBE-DT on 21 wreaking havoc with WCVB-DT on 20, just to offer one example.
It also sounds as though you just simply don't have very much signal level from the Route 128 tower farm to begin with (snowy analog signals), in which case you MIGHT benefit from a higher-gain outdoor antenna with a preamp. My experience so far with preamps on digital UHF is that they're not always the best solution, especially if you're near local signals that can overload them.
At this point the only thing I can think of that even makes sense is that the Digital transmissions arn't as strong as the Analog. So I am trying to find out if anyone has experienced similar problems with this TV or it's tuner, but so far I'm not finding a whole lot of information. What can someone tell me about the power output of the digital signals in the Boston area. Are they all operating at full power?
Most older TV antennas are combo's and most DTV is on UHF. I'm not a reception pro but I think U lose something on the UHF stations with the combo antennas. Maybe a UHF only antenna may do the trick for fringe UHF DTV reception. But as KML indicates, it's all about the topography. I would think if U can get the weaker Boston FM's at your location, you'll have no problem that can't be overcome.
[/quote]
As they say in a realtor language location location location, that is also the best for receiving OTA TV signals especially HDTV.
As indicated in some of these posting the FCC has allocated most HDTV signals on the UHF band and unless you have a host of directional focus antennas its almost impossible (in most areas) to get all the OTA HDTV signals with the best of % reception.
I had the same situation here living on the plateaus of the Blue Mt. range in VA. until i found an antenna that solves most of my problems. I found this online under HDTV reception, its called a Xium parabolic with reflective ground, its a little pricey but works. Enclosed is the web address with all the info. if interested.
[url]
[url]www.goxium.com]
vibe said:
As they say in a realtor language location location location, that is also the best for receiving OTA TV signals especially HDTV.
As indicated in some of these posting the FCC has allocated most HDTV signals on the UHF band and unless you have a host of directional focus antennas its almost impossible (in most areas) to get all the OTA HDTV signals with the best of % reception.
I had the same situation here living on the plateaus of the Blue Mt. range in VA. until i found an antenna that solves most of my problems. I found this online under HDTV reception, its called a Xium parabolic with reflective ground, its a little pricey but works. Enclosed is the web address with all the info. if interested.
[url]www.goxium.com [/url] [/url]
Skynet74 said:
Most of them are. The only exceptions I'm finding are:
WFXT (analog 25/DTV 31): on air at 78kW; has a permit for 1000kW.
WUNI (analog 27/DTV 29): on air at 11kW; has a permit for 165kW.
In both cases it is quite possible they are in fact on the air with the higher permitted power but just haven't completed the formalities for a permanent license.
Most Boston DTVs are on the same towers as their associated analogs. Exceptions I see are WSBK (38/DTV39) which is on the channel 2/4/5 tower, and three smaller stations (channels 48/62/68) which share a tower in the tower farm. (Newton, IIRC)
FRM-Yankey said:
Yikes. It actually worked?
There are cheaper ways of doing this. I would think mounting a set of rabbit ears on the outside of your house would work better than this Xium antenna.
The antenna is FAR too small to behave as a parabolic for VHF TV channels. (let alone CB radio, let alone AM!) Really, it's far too small to behave as a parabolic for UHF. Basically as far as TV signals are concerned, it's a piece of metal that happens to be shaped like a satellite dish. A watering can of the same size would probably work as well. (I suppose the dish design might win some points on aesthetics, when compared to a real TV antenna)
If it didn't cost $130 it might be worth trying...
Quick basic question:
Should I bother make an effort to install an old fashioned outdoor TV antenna?
Or will the cable TV signal be all I'll ever want?
Seems like over the air HDTV reception has the potential to render a better picture than cable. Maybe could go without cable altogether.
We live at the top of a hill - should be able to pull in everything.
Should I bother make an effort to install an old fashioned outdoor TV antenna?
Or will the cable TV signal be all I'll ever want?
Seems like over the air HDTV reception has the potential to render a better picture than cable. Maybe could go without cable altogether.
We live at the top of a hill - should be able to pull in everything.
Signpost said:
The outdoor antenna is a nice thing to have for when you want to receive out of market stations that your cable company may not carry. It's also good for if you lose your cable altogether. At least you'll have a backup antenna. If I lived on top of a hill I would not even hesitate to get an outdoor antenna. I would definitely do it. But then again I'm crazy like that. Most people probably wouldn't even use the antenna if they had cable. So it's really up to you.
- Status