• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Here comes Audacy Atlas...

That's not how the sources and uses of the debt issuance worked in this instance. CBS Corporation received cash from the parties who bought the debt. More specifically, CBS Radio as issuer conveyed the cash it received from the private debt placement to CBS Corporation.

The original plan was to spin off CBS Radio as its own company. So CBS set up an IPO for CBS Radio before Entercom or anyone else was involved:


The spin off idea came in July. Entercom entered the picture a few months later.
 
Again, thanks for the explanation. I've read descriptions on the Reverse Morris procedure and never quite "got" how CBS employed it to their advantage. So, really, what happened is that CBS used its name to get financing that the pseudo-buyer might not have gotten or gotten so advantageously and then passed that debt on to the Entercom. I think I get the procedure and the logic for this specific transaction now.

I was wondering about that, too, since Reverse Morris Trusts are typically cash free stock-for-stock deals. Of course, as the target actually takes over the acquirer, the shareholders are simultaneously voting to boot the management of the target.

I also understand most of those stock transactions have schedules that say when the officers can sell their stock in the new company. I understand a lot of Reverse Morris Trusts require the officers of the target to sell shortly after closing, thus assuring they will be compensated in the deal and for the loss of their jobs. Mark probably could explain better than I could.

I remember when Cumulus bought a cluster where I used to work in a cash/stock transaction. The owners of the local cluster didn't get as much as they had originally hoped because they weren't allowed to sell all of their stock immediately, and Cumulus stock subsequently went down. I hope they got rid of their Cumulus stock before it became worthless.
 
Here is a good explainer, which does a much better job than what I'd be capable of providing:


More info:

Selling CBS Corp. shareholders did receive a big slug of stock in Entercom. That was necessary to make this a tax-free transaction from the vantage point of CBS Corp.

All or nearly all of those shares have since been divested.

Following my reading of the explainer to which I linked above, BigA is correct that Entercom was almost certainly known to be the suitor when CBS Radio's private debt offering was announced.
 
Last edited:
Selling CBS Corp. shareholders did receive a big slug of stock in Entercom. That was necessary to make this a tax-free transaction from the vantage point of CBS Corp. All or nearly all of those shares have since been divested.

When you look at Entercom stock price over the past five years, it's all downhill. So if all shares held by CBS have been sold, and new buyers of those shares have not materialized, then it's pretty obvious why the stock price is so low, and it's doubtful that anything the company can do will revive interest. Other than take on a new partner with deep pockets.

Couple this with very bad 4th quarter news, and we can all anticipate what we'll hear during the earnings call. Here is a link to today's Cumulus 4th quarter numbers, which were down significantly from 2021. It wasn't long ago that radio companies relied on strong 4th quarters to help them get through the next year's first quarter. So that may explain why Audacy is looking at asset sales as their only way to meet expenses:


The fact that even NPR is in a situation where they're laying off 10% of their staff tells me that this isn't going to be fixed with format changes or hiring more local staff.
 
I just pulled up the 10K, issued last week, for Paramount Global. The word "Audacy" appears zero times. The word "radio" appears twice (in reference to CBS News Radio).
This is telling.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom