KOHS said:
j henry waaaaaaaaaaugh said:
See, that is defeatist "race to the bottom" thinking… …taking aim at a shrinking population segment with total disregard for entire market segments. Democrats | Liberals | Independents | Anarchists | Socialists | Libertarians | (not Republican/Conservative) | etc.… are interested in talk radio but they don't listen because in many markets, there is no option…
…carve up a shrinking segment even further, without capturing millions of potential listeners…
…'tis why iPods and satellite audience will continue to grow and soon a young person will have no concept of AM/FM despite the fact that every house has dozens of radios and it's built in without the need for computer savvy and/or expensive gadgetry…
Hard to know where to start with this one, Henry....
I'll make a few assumptions:
a- You have never worked in radio
b- You are not now or never have been a successful small business owner
c- You have never taken any business classes at a university/college
Here is why I make these assumptions:
a- You pick a target audience that will garner ratings/revenue for the station. Re-read the Pew data and compare KPHX's ratings with KTAR's.
b- You do not cater to the fringe of your audience, or those outside of your target audience (e.g.- Socialists, Anarchists, etc.)
c- Your idea of what KTAR should be doing would put them in the poor house, without an audience
If you think you can do a better job than Russ Hill or any other PD, please, get a job as a PD at a local talk station, or start your own station and prove me wrong. ;D
1. I have done work for radio previously.
2. I own my own business and it has been and is today, successful.
3. I have multiple college degrees.
First, brushing aside the personal attack, let me say you misconstrue my argument totally, and perhaps my hasty post was not constructed for full persuasive power effect…
A. Fact is, that radio audience is in decline, and narrowly focusing on that shrinking pie slice is a virtual guarantee for eventual obscurity…
B. There is a huge market of listenership totally alienated with the conventional terrestrial radio choices available to them. I see you latching on to the "fringes", but my point was aimed at the entire market, not a surgical slice, and especially those not served who disdain the hate mongering and victim radio"™ format… …reckon I could have stated that differently but bottom line is that a huge portion of the market is unserved, and continues to be unserved…
C. Unfair to match KPHX rating with KTAR rating - a legendary, historical station vs. a recent upstart that incidentally is mostly guilty of the same doings as the current market… …KTAR, at present, could feature chickens cackling and still draw higher ratings than most other stations because they've got decades long history of leadership…
D. It takes time to get wide exposure and chance to saturate market. The conservative success stories you allude to were loss leaders for many years, nurtured by wealthy scions until a critical juncture ensured profitability. Many are still financial losers, or are just pieces of a media empire, where cost is no concern, or the accounting books are juggled to funnel dollars between subsidiary company sheets…
E. AM/FM listener market keeps shrinking, yet every house has dozens of radios and it requires no computer savvy and/or expensive gadgetry (yes, I am repeating myself…)
F. Russ Hill and other PD are confined by their ownership and do the best job with the edicts (spoken, unspoken, written or unwritten) ownership calls for… …the fact that Larry Gaydosz has a nightime show illustrates that there are MANY MANY PEOPLE THAT COULD DO A BETTER JOB AT PD…
G. Aside from ratings, radio stations should be serving the public interest, and the FCC, as it was originally chartered, should be enforcing that local communities are served, regardless of political banter, sensationalist fare and corporate syndication issues…