> I thought they were building a new transmitter, any word on
> its progress?
Here's a memoRONdum I intercepted from their insecure network:
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Envelope-To: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mx3.cumulus.com ([216.234.25.4])
by localhost with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(unknown)
id 1FnD334-3333f1-E4
for
[email protected]; Fri, 20 May 2005 15:33:41 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by mx3.cumulus.com with smtp (unknown)
id kDnrgiRSGInsrikmsriomSRGimSRGHinmSRh33@cumulus
for
[email protected]; Fri, 20 May 2005 15:29:33 -0500
From: <
[email protected]>
To: <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Hot 92 Tower Relocation
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:28:59 -0500
Message-ID: kDnrgiRSGInsrikmsriomSRGimSRGHinmSRh33@cumulus
Thanks for your note, John. However, we do not believe in "proper use of funds." Quite frankly I'm a little uneasy about your objections to the way we run things...I hope this doesn't become a problem in the future.
Much Respect,
The Boss Man
On Thu, 19 May 2005 jodea said:
> Hi,
> I'm curious as to when this supposed "tower relocation"
> is going to happen. I thought we had discussed this prior
> to the station flipping? How do you expect us to compete
> in the RCHR market with a dinky signal in the middle of
> bumblefutz? Are you aware that I'm unable to get the station
> on my bathroom radio....and I LIVE LOCALLY?
>
> I'm hoping for an excellent summer book for 05, but I
> cannot say with certainty that it will be impressive. We
> are just pissing in the wind and wasting money on dead end
> ideas (like Bob and Tom, IBOC, et al) rather than having
> the proper use of funds for relocating the tower or purchasing
> the 102.3 license to simulcast Hot.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> P.S. I need a gag order on Cumulus letterhead. It seems
> that loose cannon Sam is at it again on his little rumor
> website.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
