robotique said:...this brings up a question.
In a pirate situation where the transmitter is at one location being fed by an internet connection and the studio is at another.... is the FCC only going to shut down the transmitter site? If the studio site in this scenerio is a legit production studio for internet radio and recording, can the FCC touch it?
chrisradioanimal said:They are still off the air as of today. However they posted this on Facebook: "Our technicians are working hard on resolving signal issues however until it gets resolved we encourage you to listen on Hot97Boston.com!"
WNTIRadio said:Are they still off? I'm out of town this weekend, otherwise I'd check myself.
Honestly, some guy running a watt or 2 in his neighborhood to entertain his friends doesn't bother me all that much... Hell, it's how a lot of us engineers got out start, tinkering with a home brew transmitter in our teenage years.
BUT, when you're running high power 24/7 and taking ad and underwriting revenue away from legitimate businesses (they did that to a noncomm client of mine) then you're in the territory of complete criminal. Is anyone paying taxes on that income? I'd love for someone to go after them from the IRS route. That would be far more effective than the FCC. The IRS still cares about their primary function, unlike the broadband internet wranglers at the FCC now.
raccoonradio said:Will have to look up on the diymedia.net site to see if they were issued warnings in past, etc.
On THIS page ( http://diymedia.net/fccwatch/eadtable11.htm )
Mike said:was 94.5 starting too loose revenue from hot 87.7 mabye thats why it got shut down