• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

How about a mic proc survey?

My Symetrix 528e has passed on, God rest its soul, and I have found myself looking for a new processor. I was running my AKG C2000B through the 528e into an Alesis USB board, then into my PC. The sound I would LOVE to emulate is the sound that I used to get through the Pacific Recorders module on the old AMX boards.

Before our station moved to our new, all digital studios I brough my AKG in and it sounded just marvelous through that PRE module. I could never quite capture that fat, warm sound with the 528e. Any suggestions?
 
I really like my Avalon M5/DBX286a combo

My other is the Focusrite ISA220/528 (not the E).

I want an Avalon 737... maybe in '09.
 
And, I must say, both VODood's setups sound great. The Millennia pre and the Focusrite are both pretty transparent, and the rest of the Focusrite ISA-220 sounds good.

Welcome to Candyland. There are many, many flavors here. I've been researching for over two years and have yet to buy, but soon will. Right now I'm using a Symetrix 628, and you don't want one. The pre sounds harsh, and the input gain pot is prone to dirt.

Let me preface this by saying that I've been out of radio and in just spot audio production for a long time now, and my tastes have changed since the radio days. I no longer go for a heavily processed sound, even with heavy processing. It does exist. Think transparent, yet somehow KILLER. I want my stuff to sound "recording studio," not "radio." There should be some dynamic range left for stations' Orbans to chew on, and equalization that only makes me sound more like me, not someone else.

I like a clean/forward sound. So, of the channel strips, I've narrowed my possibilities to the Buzz Audio ARC, the GML 2032 and a Universal Audio LA-3 or 1176 comp, or the API 7600. I'm also considering the "separates" route, including preamps from True Systems, Audio Upgrades, Buzz Audio, API, John Hardy, and Grace; EQ from Speck Electronics, API, or Avedis; and compression from Universal Audio, DBX, FMR Audio, or CraneSong.

Some say knowledge is power. I say knowledge is indecision!

There are also many other great chains out there, and here's why I've dismissed them from my personal wish list:

Avalon 737 - Best with "Babyface" mod, uses tubes. My studio's hot enough, thanks.
Manley Vox Box - tubes, unimpressive clarity on Skinny Johnny Weeks and others. Sorry John.
Millenia STT-1 Origin - Love the solid state, not gonna deal with the tubes.
Great River NV - Known for great sound but with many "colors" available depending on gain structure.
Focusrite ISA series - Great sound, but not gonna buy "built in China." Sure do like the digital I/O, tho.
Presonus Eureka - Made right here in Louisiana. Uh, I think I'd rather buy from China. ;-) Sorry, BR.
Nothing radio like AirCorps et al. Nothing that sounds artificial. Nothing that mic-eaters love.

I've used the mid-level gear for a long time now, and I'm tired of its mediocrity. Especially when I hear an exceptionally clean VO from the guys on here, and know it's nothing I can achieve now, even when my equipment is having a "good day."

But, I have narrowed down some parameters for what I'd prefer:
Made in America.
Made in New Zealand, maybe.
Discreet transistors, no chips, unless I go with Audio Upgrades, True, or Grace which use fast RF chips.
Nothing digital, except the DA converter if it's built-in like the API A2D and a few others.

Other issues to wrestle with:
Transformers/transformerless - tend to prefer transformerless for natural bass, but not a biggie.
Feed forward/Feedback compression - more of a feed forward kinda guy for better peak control.
Real inductor/simulated inductor EQ - WTF, I dunno! I know I don't want digital EQ.

Different high-end mic pres sound audibly different. Check out Lynn Fuston's 3D Audio Pre CD for comparison and your own personal holy grail. Then you can get into compression flavors and EQ types.

So there. Now isn't that easy?

Notice, I didn't even once mention price.

Welcome to Candyland!

JJ
 
"Before our station moved to our new, all digital studios I brough my AKG in and it sounded just marvelous through that PRE module. I could never quite capture that fat, warm sound with the 528e. Any suggestions?"

An AirCorp Pro Announcer will get your that sound. I have one. Jeff Laurence says he likes it as well.
 
JeffJasper said:
And, I must say, both VODood's setups sound great. The Millennia pre and the Focusrite are both pretty transparent, and the rest of the Focusrite ISA-220 sounds good.

Welcome to Candyland. There are many, many flavors here. I've been researching for over two years and have yet to buy, but soon will. Right now I'm using a Symetrix 628, and you don't want one. The pre sounds harsh, and the input gain pot is prone to dirt.

Let me preface this by saying that I've been out of radio and in just spot audio production for a long time now, and my tastes have changed since the radio days. I no longer go for a heavily processed sound, even with heavy processing. It does exist. Think transparent, yet somehow KILLER. I want my stuff to sound "recording studio," not "radio." There should be some dynamic range left for stations' Orbans to chew on, and equalization that only makes me sound more like me, not someone else.

I like a clean/forward sound. So, of the channel strips, I've narrowed my possibilities to the Buzz Audio ARC, the GML 2032 and a Universal Audio LA-3 or 1176 comp, or the API 7600. I'm also considering the "separates" route, including preamps from True Systems, Audio Upgrades, Buzz Audio, API, John Hardy, and Grace; EQ from Speck Electronics, API, or Avedis; and compression from Universal Audio, DBX, FMR Audio, or CraneSong.

Some say knowledge is power. I say knowledge is indecision!

There are also many other great chains out there, and here's why I've dismissed them from my personal wish list:

Avalon 737 - Best with "Babyface" mod, uses tubes. My studio's hot enough, thanks.
Manley Vox Box - tubes, unimpressive clarity on Skinny Johnny Weeks and others. Sorry John.
Millenia STT-1 Origin - Love the solid state, not gonna deal with the tubes.
Great River NV - Known for great sound but with many "colors" available depending on gain structure.
Focusrite ISA series - Great sound, but not gonna buy "built in China." Sure do like the digital I/O, tho.
Presonus Eureka - Made right here in Louisiana. Uh, I think I'd rather buy from China. ;-) Sorry, BR.
Nothing radio like AirCorps et al. Nothing that sounds artificial. Nothing that mic-eaters love.

I've used the mid-level gear for a long time now, and I'm tired of its mediocrity. Especially when I hear an exceptionally clean VO from the guys on here, and know it's nothing I can achieve now, even when my equipment is having a "good day."

But, I have narrowed down some parameters for what I'd prefer:
Made in America.
Made in New Zealand, maybe.
Discreet transistors, no chips, unless I go with Audio Upgrades, True, or Grace which use fast RF chips.
Nothing digital, except the DA converter if it's built-in like the API A2D and a few others.

Other issues to wrestle with:
Transformers/transformerless - tend to prefer transformerless for natural bass, but not a biggie.
Feed forward/Feedback compression - more of a feed forward kinda guy for better peak control.
Real inductor/simulated inductor EQ - WTF, I dunno! I know I don't want digital EQ.

Different high-end mic pres sound audibly different. Check out Lynn Fuston's 3D Audio Pre CD for comparison and your own personal holy grail. Then you can get into compression flavors and EQ types.

So there. Now isn't that easy?

Notice, I didn't even once mention price.

Welcome to Candyland!

JJ


Hey Jeff

I used to own a vintage (truly vintage, 30 years old) UREI 1176LN blackface. Sold it for the M5 and ISA 220.... but I sorely miss the 1176. The UAD-1 plug in is ok, which I have... but not the same as the outboard box.
 
My Symetrix 528e has passed on, God rest its soul,

Maybe this is only a fuse problem?

Its got a problem allright, but its not the fuse. It gets juice but there is just so much noise on the pots and other anomalies that rather than spend money to fix it, I'd just as soon spend money on a new box. I was never that happy with the sound I got from the 528e. I'd describe it as brittle and I was unhappy with the compression.

I did a little shopping after Mr Jasper's and Mr. Dood's replies. WHEW! I don't think I'll be sporting an Avalon processor anytime soon! (Gives me something to shoot for however) I would like to keep within the 528e price range (around $500) I came across the Focusrite Platinum Voicemaster Pro at Guitar Center. Was that your review Emmett? Anyone else have any experience with this unit? Seems like a pleasantly featured box for the money ($550)
 
The Focusrite sounds outstanding. The build quality is iffy though. The switches will evenually fail and need replacement. Once replaced, it will work great for a long time. The problem is that the VMP sounds better than it should for the price...Something has to give, and it happens to be the switches.

Emmett
 
robnokshus06 said:
My Symetrix 528e has passed on, God rest its soul,

Maybe this is only a fuse problem?

Its got a problem allright, but its not the fuse. It gets juice but there is just so much noise on the pots and other anomalies that rather than spend money to fix it, I'd just as soon spend money on a new box. I was never that happy with the sound I got from the 528e. I'd describe it as brittle and I was unhappy with the compression.

I did a little shopping after Mr Jasper's and Mr. Dood's replies. WHEW! I don't think I'll be sporting an Avalon processor anytime soon! (Gives me something to shoot for however) I would like to keep within the 528e price range (around $500) I came across the Focusrite Platinum Voicemaster Pro at Guitar Center. Was that your review Emmett? Anyone else have any experience with this unit? Seems like a pleasantly featured box for the money ($550)
robnokshus06 said:
My Symetrix 528e has passed on, God rest its soul,

Maybe this is only a fuse problem?

Its got a problem allright, but its not the fuse. It gets juice but there is just so much noise on the pots and other anomalies that rather than spend money to fix it, I'd just as soon spend money on a new box. I was never that happy with the sound I got from the 528e. I'd describe it as brittle and I was unhappy with the compression.

I did a little shopping after Mr Jasper's and Mr. Dood's replies. WHEW! I don't think I'll be sporting an Avalon processor anytime soon! (Gives me something to shoot for however) I would like to keep within the 528e price range (around $500) I came across the Focusrite Platinum Voicemaster Pro at Guitar Center. Was that your review Emmett? Anyone else have any experience with this unit? Seems like a pleasantly featured box for the money ($550)

Took me years and years to save up and buy gear, then sell it, sometimes for a profit, and upgrade.

My ISA I got used for half of retail and only 3 years old. Very lucky (Thank you MB), and the M5 I got off eBay for about $600 below retail new in the box. Both boxes, and a Neumann TLM103 were made possible by selling my UREI 1176LN... which I sorely miss. I've since sold the TLM103.

I skulked eBay for two months, losing auction after auction, before I got the M5. Love it too! But I'd really like an all-in-one, save for a box to use as a gate, via the Avalon 737 with the Babyface mod. The 737 and the 416, my main mic, are a pair made for one another.

One of my old 528's went on the fritz awhile back and it was a bad transistor or something that swelled due to heat. $45 and it was as good as new. The older 528 is WAY better than the 528e. The E is made with cheaper parts. If you look on eBay you can sometimes find the older 528's.

Another great vintage box that can be had for less than $250 on eBay is the Valley 400 (not the 401). These were $800-$1000 back in the 80s. I remember talking to Chris Corely and all he used at one time was the 416 and the Valley 400... this was back in 2000. Not that long ago before he switched to the RODE II Classic and the Voxbox.
 
robnokshus06 said:
...I brought my AKG in and it sounded just marvelous through that PRE module. I could never quite capture that fat, warm sound with the 528e. Any suggestions?

I sure did like the Pacific Recorders boards too, but I was always hearing it thru some type of processing, whether in production or on-air.

But I can tell you generally that a "fat, warm sound" usually comes from transformer coupling. The old Symetrixes all used transformerless designs. Going transformerless has a couple of benefits to marketing departments and manufacturers: less bass distortion (warmth) and lower manufacturing cost. Good transformers are expensive components, a good $50 and up.

Back before amplifiers on chips became popular, everything was transformer coupled, and the bass distortion (warmth) built up with every one the signal passed thru. So figure one on the mic, then the preamp input, pre output, EQ in, EQ out, compressor in and compressor out, board module in, board out, line processor in and out, STL in and out, and transmitter in, and ya got some serious mojo going there.

There are still many fantastic transformer-coupled preamps available now, because recording engineers love that sound on certain things. The Most Transformers In a Box Award probably goes to the API 7600 channel strip, which I think has 5. The 7600 also has a REALLY cool compressor, which is switchable between the feed-forward DBX sound and the feed-back UREI 1176 sound. Which one is better is a matter of taste and your application.

I suggest that if you're SERIOUSLY trying to get that warm transformer sound, take the money that you want to spend on a whole channel strip and spend it on just one really good transformer coupled preamp, like a Great River NV. The Great River essentially lets you "dial in" the mojo, and several other preamps fall in that category as well, such as the Atlas Pro Audio Juggernaut. Compression is essential, so for now get a good cheap compressor like an FMR Really Nice Compressor. Later, when you've got more money, invest in a quality, say 20-year, compressor like an 1176 or LA-3A. EQ is not such a big deal, in my opinion; you can get a standalone Presonus for $100.

I've spent a lot of money over the years on very mediocre gear. I now advocate buying only the best quality gear, piece by piece, as you can afford it. It will save you much frustration with your sound, and good gear will last your entire career. Consider the API Lunchbox system. Several fantastic manufacturers make components for the API-500 series module system that you can mix and match to your heart's content. There are preamps as transparent or as colored as you want, including tube preamps. There are several choices of EQ, all fantastic. And there are compressors of every flavor. Just slide the module in, tighten down the screws, and make your connections on the back via XLRs. The Lunchbox provides module power and phantom power for your mics. A 6-unit Lunchbox can get you covered for two complete mic chains. And you only have to pay for ONE power supply, so in the end you save money -- just like a channel strip, only YOU get to choose everything that goes in it. No more crappy compressors in an otherwise good box!

I always hated the compressor in the Symetrix 528. It's also in the wrong place in the chain. Compression should come after EQ, not before. I will say having the expander was nice, but your room really should be quiet enough that you don't need it. Some problems shouldn't be fixed with gear.

Just as a sidenote, for all who are otherwise happy with the Symetrix, but are having problems with dirty pots, Jim Williams of Audio Upgrades will go thru and replace all weak components for a very reasonable price. See http://www.audioupgrades.com. He also has a VERY transparent retrofit preamp module that he can install which has probably the lowest distortion of any pre on the market under $2000. It's like $200 installed. The stock preamp in the Symetrix is about a $5 chip.

Consider that, in production, you don't have to do all your processing on the way in. You'll get much better sonic satisfaction from spending $500 - $700 on a really good preamp, and adding EQ and compression in software (Audition or whatever), than getting a mediocre channel strip simply because you think that's all you can afford. Check out the True P-Solo and the Grace M101, both cleaner than a mountain spring, and about $500. How many reads will it take you to come up with $500 bucks?

Right now, I'm using MY LAST $5 preamp. And just think, even that's an improvement over the pre in a Mackie.

JJ
 
JeffJasper said:
robnokshus06 said:
...I brought my AKG in and it sounded just marvelous through that PRE module. I could never quite capture that fat, warm sound with the 528e. Any suggestions?

I sure did like the Pacific Recorders boards too, but I was always hearing it thru some type of processing, whether in production or on-air.

But I can tell you generally that a "fat, warm sound" usually comes from transformer coupling. The old Symetrixes all used transformerless designs. Going transformerless has a couple of benefits to marketing departments and manufacturers: less bass distortion (warmth) and lower manufacturing cost. Good transformers are expensive components, a good $50 and up.

Back before amplifiers on chips became popular, everything was transformer coupled, and the bass distortion (warmth) built up with every one the signal passed thru. So figure one on the mic, then the preamp input, pre output, EQ in, EQ out, compressor in and compressor out, board module in, board out, line processor in and out, STL in and out, and transmitter in, and ya got some serious mojo going there.

There are still many fantastic transformer-coupled preamps available now, because recording engineers love that sound on certain things. The Most Transformers In a Box Award probably goes to the API 7600 channel strip, which I think has 5. The 7600 also has a REALLY cool compressor, which is switchable between the feed-forward DBX sound and the feed-back UREI 1176 sound. Which one is better is a matter of taste and your application.

I suggest that if you're SERIOUSLY trying to get that warm transformer sound, take the money that you want to spend on a whole channel strip and spend it on just one really good transformer coupled preamp, like a Great River NV. The Great River essentially lets you "dial in" the mojo, and several other preamps fall in that category as well, such as the Atlas Pro Audio Juggernaut. Compression is essential, so for now get a good cheap compressor like an FMR Really Nice Compressor. Later, when you've got more money, invest in a quality, say 20-year, compressor like an 1176 or LA-3A. EQ is not such a big deal, in my opinion; you can get a standalone Presonus for $100.

I've spent a lot of money over the years on very mediocre gear. I now advocate buying only the best quality gear, piece by piece, as you can afford it. It will save you much frustration with your sound, and good gear will last your entire career. Consider the API Lunchbox system. Several fantastic manufacturers make components for the API-500 series module system that you can mix and match to your heart's content. There are preamps as transparent or as colored as you want, including tube preamps. There are several choices of EQ, all fantastic. And there are compressors of every flavor. Just slide the module in, tighten down the screws, and make your connections on the back via XLRs. The Lunchbox provides module power and phantom power for your mics. A 6-unit Lunchbox can get you covered for two complete mic chains. And you only have to pay for ONE power supply, so in the end you save money -- just like a channel strip, only YOU get to choose everything that goes in it. No more crappy compressors in an otherwise good box!

I always hated the compressor in the Symetrix 528. It's also in the wrong place in the chain. Compression should come after EQ, not before. I will say having the expander was nice, but your room really should be quiet enough that you don't need it. Some problems shouldn't be fixed with gear.

Just as a sidenote, for all who are otherwise happy with the Symetrix, but are having problems with dirty pots, Jim Williams of Audio Upgrades will go thru and replace all weak components for a very reasonable price. See http://www.audioupgrades.com. He also has a VERY transparent retrofit preamp module that he can install which has probably the lowest distortion of any pre on the market under $2000. It's like $200 installed. The stock preamp in the Symetrix is about a $5 chip.

Consider that, in production, you don't have to do all your processing on the way in. You'll get much better sonic satisfaction from spending $500 - $700 on a really good preamp, and adding EQ and compression in software (Audition or whatever), than getting a mediocre channel strip simply because you think that's all you can afford. Check out the True P-Solo and the Grace M101, both cleaner than a mountain spring, and about $500. How many reads will it take you to come up with $500 bucks?

Right now, I'm using MY LAST $5 preamp. And just think, even that's an improvement over the pre in a Mackie.

JJ


John Wells uses only a Mackie 1202 and a 416. That's it. Feeds right to the ISDN. Some pretty freakin' good sounding audio. He has the Focusrite Red boxes, all of them. Tells me he rarely turns them on anymore.

www.johnwells.com
 
I always hated the compressor in the Symetrix 528. It's also in the wrong place in the chain. Compression should come after EQ, not before. I will say having the expander was nice, but your room really should be quiet enough that you don't need it. Some problems shouldn't be fixed with gear.

Yikes! While I agree that the compressor in the 528 leaves a lot to be desired, it is in exactly the right location. Compressor should always be pre-EQ, unless you're after some sort of special effect. Compression changes the effect of EQ, but the reverse isn't true. From an RMS standpoint, EQ has no effect on compression. 2:1 is still 2:1. Putting the compressor post-EQ causes it to duck and recover completely differently from transients, lending to the over-compressed "radio" sound. Not good when you're going for a sound that's the least bit natural. The only time I ever run compressor post-EQ is if I'm using a heavy filter for an effect. Otherwise, compressor post-EQ pretty much renders the EQ useless, in terms of any scientific, correctional or musical standpoint. Of course, all of this is creative, so it doesn't really matter in the end, as long as it sounds good. But from an engineering perspective, stating that the EQ should be pre-compressor is simply false.

EQ is not such a big deal, in my opinion; you can get a standalone Presonus for $100.

Gotta disagree with you there too. For those using EQ, it's just as important as the compressor and preamp. The quality of EQ is largely defined by phase-shift, which is much nastier in low-end EQ units. In the upper end, there are linear-phase EQs and there are EQs that shift phase, but in a much more pleasing manner. Much like good tube distortion Vs. cheap IC-based distortion. It makes a big difference. Low cost EQ units alter the sound even when set flat and it isn't pretty. Higher end units are much better when set flat. Some still alter the sound, but not in a bad way...Most don't change it at all.

Emmett
 
Emmett said:
I always hated the compressor in the Symetrix 528. It's also in the wrong place in the chain. Compression should come after EQ, not before. I will say having the expander was nice, but your room really should be quiet enough that you don't need it. Some problems shouldn't be fixed with gear.

Yikes! While I agree that the compressor in the 528 leaves a lot to be desired, it is in exactly the right location. Compressor should always be pre-EQ, unless you're after some sort of special effect. Compression changes the effect of EQ, but the reverse isn't true. From an RMS standpoint, EQ has no effect on compression. 2:1 is still 2:1. Putting the compressor post-EQ causes it to duck and recover completely differently from transients, lending to the over-compressed "radio" sound. Not good when you're going for a sound that's the least bit natural. The only time I ever run compressor post-EQ is if I'm using a heavy filter for an effect. Otherwise, compressor post-EQ pretty much renders the EQ useless, in terms of any scientific, correctional or musical standpoint. Of course, all of this is creative, so it doesn't really matter in the end, as long as it sounds good. But from an engineering perspective, stating that the EQ should be pre-compressor is simply false.

EQ is not such a big deal, in my opinion; you can get a standalone Presonus for $100.

Gotta disagree with you there too. For those using EQ, it's just as important as the compressor and preamp. The quality of EQ is largely defined by phase-shift, which is much nastier in low-end EQ units. In the upper end, there are linear-phase EQs and there are EQs that shift phase, but in a much more pleasing manner. Much like good tube distortion Vs. cheap IC-based distortion. It makes a big difference. Low cost EQ units alter the sound even when set flat and it isn't pretty. Higher end units are much better when set flat. Some still alter the sound, but not in a bad way...Most don't change it at all.

Emmett

Eric Chase and Ann Dewig, who learned EQ technique from Chase, both state how important EQ really is. I gotta tell ya,..listen to any Chase produced audio and you can hear it. He can make Corley sit in any mix. CC has one heavy voice.
 
VODood said:
JeffJasper said:
... The stock preamp in the Symetrix is about a $5 chip.

Consider that, in production, you don't have to do all your processing on the way in. You'll get much better sonic satisfaction from spending $500 - $700 on a really good preamp, and adding EQ and compression in software (Audition or whatever), than getting a mediocre channel strip simply because you think that's all you can afford. Check out the True P-Solo and the Grace M101, both cleaner than a mountain spring, and about $500. How many reads will it take you to come up with $500 bucks?

Right now, I'm using MY LAST $5 preamp. And just think, even that's an improvement over the pre in a Mackie.

JJ


John Wells uses only a Mackie 1202 and a 416. That's it. Feeds right to the ISDN. Some pretty freakin' good sounding audio. He has the Focusrite Red boxes, all of them. Tells me he rarely turns them on anymore.

www.johnwells.com

I'm using the old Mackie 8-bus, for monitoring and reverb-send only now, but I understand the newer Mackies do sound better. On my 8-bus the pres sound less open than the Symetrix.

The 1202 probably is fine for ISDN, especially if we're talking over a 128k bitrate. That's a lot of lossy compression. The only audio I send at a rate that low is very long narration and on-hold. I'm sure the 1202 rig is a nice, simple setup, complete with headphone amp and perfect in that application. If I had the Reds, tho, I'd still have to turn 'em on! :)

JJ
 
Emmett said:
Yikes! While I agree that the compressor in the 528 leaves a lot to be desired, it is in exactly the right location. Compressor should always be pre-EQ, unless you're after some sort of special effect. Compression changes the effect of EQ, but the reverse isn't true. From an RMS standpoint, EQ has no effect on compression. 2:1 is still 2:1. Putting the compressor post-EQ causes it to duck and recover completely differently from transients, lending to the over-compressed "radio" sound. Not good when you're going for a sound that's the least bit natural. The only time I ever run compressor post-EQ is if I'm using a heavy filter for an effect. Otherwise, compressor post-EQ pretty much renders the EQ useless, in terms of any scientific, correctional or musical standpoint. Of course, all of this is creative, so it doesn't really matter in the end, as long as it sounds good. But from an engineering perspective, stating that the EQ should be pre-compressor is simply false.

EQ is not such a big deal, in my opinion; you can get a standalone Presonus for $100.

Gotta disagree with you there too. For those using EQ, it's just as important as the compressor and preamp. The quality of EQ is largely defined by phase-shift, which is much nastier in low-end EQ units. In the upper end, there are linear-phase EQs and there are EQs that shift phase, but in a much more pleasing manner. Much like good tube distortion Vs. cheap IC-based distortion. It makes a big difference. Low cost EQ units alter the sound even when set flat and it isn't pretty. Higher end units are much better when set flat. Some still alter the sound, but not in a bad way...Most don't change it at all.

Emmett

Thank you for your insight, Emmett. I guess there are a few things I should qualify.

Regarding where EQ should be in the mic chain, I don't do heavy EQ. We're talking +4 @ 3.5k, and that's it. Just a little presence peak, no more than built into many mics and much less than quite a few. I have a particular mid resonance in my voice. If I should happen to get loud on a note near 3.5k, I don't mind the compressor momentarily pushing that down. I'd prefer it. There may be slight artifacts, I know. I don't EQ nearly as radically as many of the guys on this forum. I also don't compress more than once, unless it's on an effect such as "telephone" sound. My current setup, 416 into a Symetrix 628, has EQ post compression as you prefer. What can I say, I simply don't like it. Let's call that a matter of taste. I do agree that having EQ post-compression is likely to sound less processed. Perhaps I sounded dogmatic about having the EQ before compression; I'm sure it's not for everyone.

When I said that "EQ is not such a big deal," that was in the context of configuring a low-budget, high-end rig for Robnoxious, not in an ideal world. If I were selecting gear and on a budget, I'd first go with a high-end preamp and do my processing in software. But if I simply had to have outboard EQ and compression, and only a few bucks to play with, I'd go first with an RNC, and then use any money left over for EQ. Compression is more important than EQ to me. Yes, cheap EQ is nasty.

Guys, this is a great discussion! The first EQ I was exposed to was the old Massenburg ITI parametric in '74. It was so expensive we could only afford one channel. It was fantastic, and really makes me envious of John Week's GML 2032. It's got pretty much the same EQ, along with a very clean and neutral preamp. It's even got the insert right where Emmett likes it. I think I'd like one, and a tasty compressor to boot. But if my budget were more limited, I'd still go with just a good preamp.

At 51, ok, so hey, I'm an old fart. And I'm personally shopping for a rig to last the remainder of my career. So my advice for someone planning to spend $500 - $750 on a channel strip is to re-think that, and consider just buying (for now) a quality preamp that you'll likely never have to replace. And build from there.

Ten years ago, I would have only considered a complete channel strip.

JJ
 
Something a lot of people don't realize is that software EQ behaves exactly like hadware. That means not all of them are created equal...Just like hardware, it requires careful listening and selection. I really like the Waves SSL EQ. It has a nice sound. And I prefer the EQ in my Voicemaster to many software EQs. Although the EQ in the Voicemaster is simple and, for the most part fixed, the few options you have sound really nice. Luckily, there are lots of free EQ plug-ins out there. Some are great, others are icky.

As for standalone preamp vs. channel strip, I think there are several factors that come into play here. Not long ago, I had a huge workload and processing with software was not convenient. Also, hardware is essential for ISDN sessions. Another reason I like channel strips is because it's nice to hear your processed voice while recording. I relax a lot more and don't push my voice when I hear it processed. And finally, hardware always has a 'sound', good or bad. As I've mentioned, the preamp in the Voicemaster is good, but not exceptional...But the processing is very, very good. I can't quite duplicate the color with software.

For pure sound quality, I agree a quality preamp and software is the way to go! I usually tell people to just buy a good preamp if they don't need the convenience of a channel strip.

Emmett
 
I want to thank everyone who took part in this thread. your contributions really helped with my research. I managed to purchase a slightly used Focusrite Platinum Voicemaster Pro off of Amazon for $399 AND the seller threw in a Bluebird mic from Blue for free! (mic was used as well).

The unit arrived a couple of days ago. I managed to get it in the rack and plugged in the mic and everything works and sounds great. I'm looking forward to spending some time with the unit this weekend getting it all dialed in.

I'm no engineer, so all of your posts were instrumental in me scoring this deal (around $850 worth of gear for under $400) Thanks again!

C-ya 'round the dial.

-Rob
 
robnokshus06 said:
I want to thank everyone who took part in this thread. your contributions really helped with my research. I managed to purchase a slightly used Focusrite Platinum Voicemaster Pro off of Amazon for $399 AND the seller threw in a Bluebird mic from Blue for free! (mic was used as well).

The unit arrived a couple of days ago. I managed to get it in the rack and plugged in the mic and everything works and sounds great. I'm looking forward to spending some time with the unit this weekend getting it all dialed in.

I'm no engineer, so all of your posts were instrumental in me scoring this deal (around $850 worth of gear for under $400) Thanks again!

C-ya 'round the dial.

-Rob


Well done!
 
Still using, and still happy with my True systems P-solo/286a combo...in a perfect world, I'd just be using the P-solo, but with room noise issues, the expander on the 286a is a huuuge help..aside from that, I find the compression on the 286, if used too much will defeat the sound of the P-solo...so I use software for compression, etc
 
robnokshus06 said:
My Symetrix 528e has passed on, God rest its soul, and I have found myself looking for a new processor. I was running my AKG C2000B through the 528e into an Alesis USB board, then into my PC. The sound I would LOVE to emulate is the sound that I used to get through the Pacific Recorders module on the old AMX boards.

Before our station moved to our new, all digital studios I brough my AKG in and it sounded just marvelous through that PRE module. I could never quite capture that fat, warm sound with the 528e. Any suggestions?

I agree with you, the Pacific Recorder mic compressor modules were great. The only other compressor that was like the PR module is a Urei la-3 or la-4 Talk about smooth, warm and fat! They cost a small fortune now. About $1500-$2000 for a MONO. I bought one in '87 for $500

BTW...compression FIRST...then EQ If you place EQ first then Compression, the compression will change your EQ sound.

Oh one last thing...i'm really impressed with the EQ and Compession/limiting in ADOBE. Incredible you can get all this for under 500 bucks!
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom