• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

How are Hannity's numbers?

mred said:
I think he milks the female demographic, by putting up a lot of female callers that say he's cute, etc. politics aside I don't see what people see in him, and he always, ums, hums, and ha's....
This fella is pretty lame. I'm amazed so many broadcasters put this weak programming on, thinking he's their map to the gold mine.

Here's what one writer wrote online after a heritage talker - KCMO - dumped local p.m. drive programming for lousy Hannity.

The station aired a successful mornings program, hosted by George Woods, and an afternoon drive news program, hosted by Dan Roberts and Scott Mayman. The Afternoon show proved popular and in its final survey, beat the opposition KMBZ Drive show. Despite the popularity of the show, management canceled the program, and brought in the syndicated conservative Sean Hannity, thus handing the audience back to the competitor KMBZ.

Guess running Hannity isn't the dream many think. It made the station's ratings - already low - slide further.
 
Ultimajock said:
...most great Americans would pay for the privilege of socking Hannity in the mouth with a set of brass knuckles...


That kind of remark is illustrative of what is wrong in so much of America.
 
pbf1 said:
Ultimajock said:
...most great Americans would pay for the privilege of socking Hannity in the mouth with a set of brass knuckles...


That kind of remark is illustrative of what is wrong in so much of America.

That last remark notwithstanding, most people I know who don't like Hannity, base their opinion on his style (or lack thereof). Some of these same people are conservatives who do listen to certain drumbeaters like Limbaugh, they just find Hannity too one-dimensional.
 
pbf1 said:
Ultimajock said:
...most great Americans would pay for the privilege of socking Hannity in the mouth with a set of brass knuckles...


That kind of remark is illustrative of what is wrong in so much of America.

...yeah -- not enough brass knuckles in circulation ;D ...
 
Ultimajock said:
pbf1 said:
Ultimajock said:
...most great Americans would pay for the privilege of socking Hannity in the mouth with a set of brass knuckles...


That kind of remark is illustrative of what is wrong in so much of America.

...yeah -- not enough brass knuckles in circulation ;D ...

Not exactly a healthy way to go about life - "agree with me, or I'll beat you."

Fortunately, that approach tends to fail...
 
As to why programmers put Hannity on: if you've got the one-two combo of Rush-Hannity, you've probably got a chance to have someone punch up your station and leave it there. Now, I will add that when Hannity doesn't have the Rush lead-in, I'd wager his performance is not the same.

Now, I am no conservative, and I rarely agree with what Rush says, but I will not deny that he is fun to listen to because he is having fun - no matter what. Hannity, however, takes himself way to seriously - and it's not the same, because he's filling that everyman, I-shop-at-Wal-Mart-too role (even if he's talking about buying really expensive hybrid GM SUVs). Which is a shame, because I've been told that when Hannity was Rush's number one fill-in, he was a different host.

Now, if Hannity were to leave, you can bet Premiere would be chomping at the bit to slot him in after Rush. (Forget putting him on that godawful Fox News Talk service - you're gonna put him on the number one brand). Then, they would practically own the dayparts that matter in talk - from Beck to Rush to Hannity - for SIX days a week (remember, all three have weekend best-ofs now). Then, whenever el Rushbo decides to hang 'em up and smoke cigars full-time (that line shamefully stolen from somewhere else), you move Hannity into the mid-day slot (which I think would happen no matter who is syndicating the show) and don't miss too much of a beat.

If Hannity were to leave ABC and not end up at Premiere, there's no way someone would be dumb enough to put him up against Rush. The only affiliates that would clear him live would be the ones who don't have Rush - and those are usually the number two or three talk stations in a market. Most of the current affiliates would probably air him tape delay - MAYBE, considering all the risks you run with a delayed show sounding out of date, especially on busy news days. (Oy vey, like the time my station ran Beck after Rush...)

In the end, Hannity's smart - and he's a broadcaster. Money's one thing, but ownership of the show and stability of your owner is another. He sees that Citadel ain't ABC, and it never will be. He's made enough now to build the home studio like Rush and have his own golden (or silver) microphone, and know he could write his own ticket to just about any syndicator he wants - or start his own, lease the sat time, and let someone else handle the sales (which Premiere could also do on both counts).

But would Scott Shannon still be able to voice the liners for the show? THAT'S the $64,000 question! ;)
 
He's strictly a one topic at at time guy. Now it's all Obama's association with his minister and a former member of the a 60s radical group. Has anyone thought of doing a life-long background check Sean Hannity?
 
NENewsGuy said:
He's strictly a one topic at at time guy. Now it's all Obama's association with his minister and a former member of the a 60s radical group. Has anyone thought of doing a life-long background check Sean Hannity?

He's not running for office. His listeners are fans. Short of a felony conviction for a crime, I doubt you'll dig up anything that will change his listeners' opionion.

NENewsGuy, I've seen you post on several different threads regarding your hatred for Hannity. Might I suggest you give your stress level a break and not listen. If he's so one-topic driven, and you don't like it, why would you subject yourself to it day after day? Or did you just listen to a few minutes one day and form your opinion?
 
The left has done it's dirt digging of Limbaugh and the best they've done is the cyst that may have kept him out of the draft. If you really want to know whether Hannity's numbers are just a matter of following Rush, you'd have to compare them to the ratings of whatever was there before Hannity.
 
virgilstreetnc said:
I've seen you post on several different threads regarding your hatred for Hannity.

I don't hate Hannity. I just believe his one topic a day rant is not informative or entertaining enough for a three-hour national show. He lacks the talent and smarts possessed by other hosts like Rush Limbaugh. Hannity is number 2 by default only because he follows Rush in most cities.
 
NENewsGuy said:
virgilstreetnc said:
I've seen you post on several different threads regarding your hatred for Hannity.

I don't hate Hannity. I just believe his one topic a day rant is not informative or entertaining enough for a three-hour national show. He lacks the talent and smarts possessed by other hosts like Rush Limbaugh. Hannity is number 2 by default only because he follows Rush in most cities.

People are not zombies. If they are not entertained or informed, there are more choices in most towns.
 
It is afternoon drive (in the east), and listeners are in and out of the car and the audience all day. It's not unusual for morning shows to repeat bits throughout the show, and talk radio is, as much as anything else, about "playing the hits". If you believe that Hannity's numbers are by default, do a comparison with whatever show preceded it it in the timeslot Hannity is now in. I'm quite sure he beat Clark Howard's numbers in WHIO's slot, for example. People aren't going to just listen to a sweep tone because it follows Rush.
 
barthgimble said:
Sean Hannity was the first good talker to be syndicated in PM Drive so his show became a continuation of the Limbaugh show. He has zeal,
passion, and charisma which guys like Bohannan and Larry King lack. Those guys are on late at night for one good reason. They can cure insomnia. When Hannity first started in syndication, there were more local shows in the afternoon. Now most shows after AM Drive are syndicated. Ironically, Bill Clinton opened the door for Hannity with deregulation.

Hannity...charisma? Those words together don't match. He is the most partisan of all. Bush Butt Boy to the limit. His success and appeal will go when Limbaugh goes. His ratings haven't grown for years. ABC knows it and probably will not pay if in fact he decides to dart to Premiere, which is my guess. If he doesn't change the radio schtick, his numbers will continue to fade. Any time he goes up against real competition, he loses. Benefiting from FNC over exposure. He is capitalizing while the iron is hot, but it will cool fast.
 
radiodaze2000 said:
barthgimble said:
Sean Hannity was the first good talker to be syndicated in PM Drive so his show became a continuation of the Limbaugh show. He has zeal,
passion, and charisma which guys like Bohannan and Larry King lack. Those guys are on late at night for one good reason. They can cure insomnia. When Hannity first started in syndication, there were more local shows in the afternoon. Now most shows after AM Drive are syndicated. Ironically, Bill Clinton opened the door for Hannity with deregulation.

Hannity...charisma? Those words together don't match. He is the most partisan of all. Bush Butt Boy to the limit. His success and appeal will go when Limbaugh goes. His ratings haven't grown for years. ABC knows it and probably will not pay if in fact he decides to dart to Premiere, which is my guess. If he doesn't change the radio schtick, his numbers will continue to fade. Any time he goes up against real competition, he loses. Benefiting from FNC over exposure. He is capitalizing while the iron is hot, but it will cool fast.

You complain of how partisan he is and then call him a Bush Butt Boy? What does that make you? (overreacting moderators please relax and leave this right here)

Let's not be silly he gets over 10 million listeners, there will be a bidding war over this guy for years to come.
 
As a News-Talk Programmer, with a station that doesn't carry Rush would it bother you how often Sean mentions Rush? Rush is on my direct competeter and it seems to me it just gives even more top of mind awareness to a brand that has the strongest top of mind in talk radio.
 
voicenky said:
As a News-Talk Programmer, with a station that doesn't carry Rush would it bother you how often Sean mentions Rush? Rush is on my direct competeter and it seems to me it just gives even more top of mind awareness to a brand that has the strongest top of mind in talk radio.

I have worked at a station with both, on with just Hannity and one with just Rush. They did good on all three. I can't imagine anyone listening to Sean Hannity, already doesn't know where to find Rush. You have to counterprogam, with either money talk, local talk or something else.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom