Saw a similar thread on the LA Board, personally I picked up KQED once around Red Bluff
travisl5678 said:Saw a similar thread on the LA Board, personally I picked up KQED once around Red Bluff
radioguy39nj said:Looks like KFRC-FM, which simulcasts All News KCBS, gets out far to the east of SF.
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=KFRC&service=FM&status=L&hours=U
Some think it's a waste to simulcast a 50 kW blaster news outlet on a class B FM but I'm sure KCBS would disagree.![]()
DavidKaye said:radioguy39nj said:Looks like KFRC-FM, which simulcasts All News KCBS, gets out far to the east of SF.
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=KFRC&service=FM&status=L&hours=U
Some think it's a waste to simulcast a 50 kW blaster news outlet on a class B FM but I'm sure KCBS would disagree.![]()
KCBS ratings have improved since the FM addition. There are simply a lot of people who can't or won't tune into an AM station.
radioguy39nj said:DavidKaye said:radioguy39nj said:Looks like KFRC-FM, which simulcasts All News KCBS, gets out far to the east of SF.
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=KFRC&service=FM&status=L&hours=U
Some think it's a waste to simulcast a 50 kW blaster news outlet on a class B FM but I'm sure KCBS would disagree.![]()
KCBS ratings have improved since the FM addition. There are simply a lot of people who can't or won't tune into an AM station.
Almost no one under age 55 could care less about AM radio. Major market 50 kW AM blasters will probably survive, but even in those markets I think you'll some migration of news, talk and sports to FM.![]()
michael hagerty said:radioguy39nj said:DavidKaye said:radioguy39nj said:Looks like KFRC-FM, which simulcasts All News KCBS, gets out far to the east of SF.
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=KFRC&service=FM&status=L&hours=U
Some think it's a waste to simulcast a 50 kW blaster news outlet on a class B FM but I'm sure KCBS would disagree.![]()
KCBS ratings have improved since the FM addition. There are simply a lot of people who can't or won't tune into an AM station.
Almost no one under age 55 could care less about AM radio. Major market 50 kW AM blasters will probably survive, but even in those markets I think you'll some migration of news, talk and sports to FM.![]()
Already happening. L.A. and San Francisco are a bit behind the curve on this.
michael hagerty said:From Donner Summit down to about Auburn on I-80, the line of sight is good enough to get most full-power SF FMs.
travisl5678 said:Isn't KIOI 120,000 watts? How far does it go?
icybluelake said:This is kind of an interesting phenomenon -- I don't live in Norcal, but have visited fairly often. When I travel east or northeast from the Bay Area, I lose the signal from most of the Bay Area stations somewhere in the central valley.
Farther north and east, climbing into the foothills of the Sierras, several of the SF stations become listenable again. I've heard Wild 94.9, Now 99.7, and KDFC 102.1 for sure, and probably others -- well into the Sierras. More than once, I picked up Wild around Lassen Peak in Northern California, 200+ miles from SF, and 99.7 in Nevada, south of Reno/Carson City and well east of the Sierras.
It's kind of interesting to a DX nerd from the East Coast, Norcal locals could probably fill in much more about this.
Domingo said:icybluelake said:This is kind of an interesting phenomenon -- I don't live in Norcal, but have visited fairly often. When I travel east or northeast from the Bay Area, I lose the signal from most of the Bay Area stations somewhere in the central valley.
Farther north and east, climbing into the foothills of the Sierras, several of the SF stations become listenable again. I've heard Wild 94.9, Now 99.7, and KDFC 102.1 for sure, and probably others -- well into the Sierras. More than once, I picked up Wild around Lassen Peak in Northern California, 200+ miles from SF, and 99.7 in Nevada, south of Reno/Carson City and well east of the Sierras.
It's kind of interesting to a DX nerd from the East Coast, Norcal locals could probably fill in much more about this.
What you normally see as "FCC Contours" only accounts for terrain immediately surrounding the transmitter site.
To get a better idea of how the terrain in the Bay Area truly affects signals, go to this site:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=80
and type in the call letters of any San Francisco TV station. Since TV and FM signals propagate very similarly, you will see an example of how an ACTUAL signal propagates over some peaks, and is shadowed out by others, thus affecting where you can hear the signal. You will also see how the signal shows up in some of the Sierras, since their altitudes put them above the line of sight horizon from most of the Bay Area sticks.
MarioMania said:To get a better idea of how the terrain in the Bay Area truly affects signals, go to this site:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=80
and type in the call letters of any San Francisco TV station. Since TV and FM signals propagate very similarly, you will see an example of how an ACTUAL signal propagates over some peaks, and is shadowed out by others, thus affecting where you can hear the signal.