I don't know how many of you saw the article in this morning's
Parade magazine concerning how to fix the mess the NBA
is in ($400 million in the red this year); without going through all
the details, commissioner David Stern and some player reps such
as David Falk (Michael Jordan) and Steve Mountain (Jameer Nelson
of Orlando) proposed some changes. How do you think they would
impact the television ratings?
1. Stern suggests abolishing offensive interference and allow players
to do anything with the ball above the rim.
2. Mountain would allow eight fouls before a player is ejected, although
the sixth and seventh fouls would be technicals.
3. Falk would cut the 24-second clock to 20 seconds; if not, create a
four-point play.
4. Falk suggests that potential players be out of high school for three years
before entering the draft (I think they ought to complete three years of college;
they can always go back in the offseason to complete their senior year).
5. Encourage quirks: Jon Wertheim of Sports Illustrated points out that
Charles Barkley still gets endorsement offers; Tim Duncan does not.
6. Mountain suggests eliminating or significantly reducing rules that require salaries
of traded players to match up.
7. Falk would cut the number of regular-season games. With a 16-game schedule,
every NFL game is important; with 82 games, many fans consider the NBA to have
too many that are meaningless. (And frankly, even though the Celtics and Lakers
are playing for the NBA championship, I have no desire to watch basketball--or
hockey--in June. Why can't the NBA playoffs take place in their entirety around,
or just after, March Madness? I would amplify on what Falk is saying and not let
so many teams into the playoffs, or have some single-elimination--read, NCAA--
rounds, at least in the early stages.)
Thoughts? Also, any thoughts about a realignment of college football that
could send Missouri and Nebraska into the Big 10, and Texas to either the Big 10,
SEC, or Pac-10?
Parade magazine concerning how to fix the mess the NBA
is in ($400 million in the red this year); without going through all
the details, commissioner David Stern and some player reps such
as David Falk (Michael Jordan) and Steve Mountain (Jameer Nelson
of Orlando) proposed some changes. How do you think they would
impact the television ratings?
1. Stern suggests abolishing offensive interference and allow players
to do anything with the ball above the rim.
2. Mountain would allow eight fouls before a player is ejected, although
the sixth and seventh fouls would be technicals.
3. Falk would cut the 24-second clock to 20 seconds; if not, create a
four-point play.
4. Falk suggests that potential players be out of high school for three years
before entering the draft (I think they ought to complete three years of college;
they can always go back in the offseason to complete their senior year).
5. Encourage quirks: Jon Wertheim of Sports Illustrated points out that
Charles Barkley still gets endorsement offers; Tim Duncan does not.
6. Mountain suggests eliminating or significantly reducing rules that require salaries
of traded players to match up.
7. Falk would cut the number of regular-season games. With a 16-game schedule,
every NFL game is important; with 82 games, many fans consider the NBA to have
too many that are meaningless. (And frankly, even though the Celtics and Lakers
are playing for the NBA championship, I have no desire to watch basketball--or
hockey--in June. Why can't the NBA playoffs take place in their entirety around,
or just after, March Madness? I would amplify on what Falk is saying and not let
so many teams into the playoffs, or have some single-elimination--read, NCAA--
rounds, at least in the early stages.)
Thoughts? Also, any thoughts about a realignment of college football that
could send Missouri and Nebraska into the Big 10, and Texas to either the Big 10,
SEC, or Pac-10?