> Some comments:
>
> (1) Those boosters usually add more noise than they do
> signal. Most car radios already have excellent front ends
> and a booster will only make matters worse.
>
> (2) If you actually got improvement with a cheap booster
> like the Radio Shack unit, then you need to consider a
> better car radio. I will get flamed for this, but Pioneer
> supertuners have more sensitivity than anything else I have
> tried, and I get close to 300 mile reception, depending on
> the station and terrain.
>
> (3) Even the Pioneer supertuners can benefit from the
> narrow ceramic filter modification. If you want to know
> more,
>
>
http://www.mindspring.com/~brucec/select.htm
>
http://www.geocities.com/rbrucecarter/ceramic_filter.htm
>
> (4) CCrane still sells decent length auto antennas. It is
> a myth that FM antennas should be only 31 inches long:
>
http://www.ccrane.com/antennas/auto-antennas/index.aspx
>
yea, i have a booster that i used to use with my outdoor antenna at home, without it, most of the nashville signals come in clear (i'm 90 miles south of nashville) with it, they all are covered with noise and false stereo (where the signal isn't strong enough for stereo but the booster makes it think it is and thus results in a whole lot of noise, they especially aren't good for lower end tuners that have poor seperation such as my boombox, because I am only 8 miles from the WZYP (100kw 104.3) transmitter and 12 from the WDRM (100kw 102.1) both of those signals tend to interfere with everything on the weaker radios, with the booster, that is ALL that i hear on every frequency. So, my only suggestion would to be just get a new radio, my choice would be Pioneer with the super tuner. My dads bronco has one in it and that thing can get memphis stations (180 miles away) on a regular basis (mostly 102.7)
<P ID="signature">______________
<div align="center"><a href="http://wrcf.tk">
</P></span></P></span>
http://dingo100.tk
http://wrcf.tk</P>