> >
> When you go to stormaid.com, you see it is a Clear Channel
> charity which explains LowDown's motives. 'nuff said.
>
Yup, my motives must be really awful. The Red Cross is such a horrible thing to be associated with...
I got the site from another website along with
www.redcross.org
www.salvationarmyusa.org
All I'm saying is that if every charitable organization is saying give money because that's what they need right now...it's silly to load up a bunch of stuff, spend a week on the road (and/or organization center) trying to get it to the people in need, only to have it sit in an area where no one can deal with it.
If I'm hearing the news right, by the time it's delivered, no one will be in New Orleans in a week's time anyway except clean up crews. The entire city's population is being evacuated to far flung states willing to accept "refugees"...the expectation is that people will be spread out over more than 10 different states. What they need is money. Money for room and board...basic necessitites, and income replacement...even mortgage payments (although that may sound strange, it's true...you still have to pay your mortgage).
Imagine being a "refugee" in Houston...alone in a city unfamiliar to you, displaced relatives still missing, living in a hotel or motel, and hearing that some Iowan's have gathered a truck of bottled water and blankets and stuff. What good does that do you?
This is not a typical disaster...and the typical response (while good intentioned) isn't what they need right now.
As I said from the outset...good intentions, but a waste of PR. I'll listen to the story on the radio of how the items are received and dispersed, but I'd be willing to bet that Z won't air it if what I've said turns out to be true...
From Red Cross Website (
http://www.redcross.org/donate/goods/):
"Donations of goods and services, also known as in-kind donations, can be valuable resources on a relief effort. However, misguided in-kind donations can also have the effect of hampering the relief effort if inappropriate or excessive contributions arriving at the disaster site impede the distribution of priority items..."
and
"Unsolicited, spontaneous donations of goods and services from individuals and community groups, though well intentioned, have hidden costs and pose a number of complications for relief efforts. For these reasons, the Red Cross is unable to accept any large collections of items, such as used clothing, hygiene items, furniture, toys, and canned goods..."
and
"Collections of items require valuable and scarce resources such as time, money, and personnel to sort, clean, and distribute them, which come at the expense of the emergency activities relief workers are attempting to perform. The Red Cross has neither the resources, nor the logistical set-up, to properly handle these types of donations, and therefore cannot accept them..."
Need I say more?<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">
Edited by LowDown on 09/04/05 07:16 PM.</FONT></P>