• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

I AM FLEETWOOD MAC'D TO DEATH

OK, I was a fan at first. But 971 The River is on a stuck mode. It is amazing how quickly a new format on a station that was doing nothing with Jamz, is now going to fail miserably, AGAIN.
Why in the HELL don't these programmer's see the light?

SHAKE UP THE PLAYLIST. PLEASE.

This is what a classic rock/oldies station should sound like. It is Capital Gold out of London. Here is a link --Listen- Is is amazing.

http://rope.icgo.fimc.net/staticweb/onair_players/onair_capitalgold/player/onair_goldIE.html<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by BIGSTICK on 01/16/06 02:17 PM.</FONT></P>
 
> OK, I was a fan at first. But 971 The River is on a stuck
> mode. It is amazing how quickly a new format on a station
> that was doing nothing with Jamz, is now going to fail
> miserably, AGAIN.
> Why in the HELL don't these programmer's see the light?
>
> SHAKE UP THE PLAYLIST. PLEASE.
>
> This is what a classic rock/oldies station should sound
> like. It is Capital Gold out of London. Here is a link
> --Listen- Is is amazing.
>
http://rope.icgo.fimc.net/static> web/onair_players/onair_capitalgold/player/onair_goldIE.html
What a shame.And they always seem to do it with Fleetwood Mac.I remember when Z93 drove me away with the endless Fleetwood Mac.
>
 
Let's see...what Madam Ruby sees.

> OK, I was a fan at first. But 971 The River is on a stuck
> mode. It is amazing how quickly a new format on a station
> that was doing nothing with Jamz, is now going to fail
> miserably, AGAIN.


It must be nice to have a crystal ball! It's only been a couple weeks, and you guys are already dooming it to fail? GEEZ!

If you don't like how much Fleetwood Mac they play, then change the channel when they play it! Or throw a CD in!
 
Re: Let's see...what Madam Ruby sees.

> > OK, I was a fan at first. But 971 The River is on a stuck
> > mode. It is amazing how quickly a new format on a station
> > that was doing nothing with Jamz, is now going to fail
> > miserably, AGAIN.
>
>
> It must be nice to have a crystal ball! It's only been a
> couple weeks, and you guys are already dooming it to fail?
> GEEZ!
>
> If you don't like how much Fleetwood Mac they play, then
> change the channel when they play it! Or throw a CD in!

You seem to fail to grasp what I was saying. It is a clone of every radio station in the Country with this type of format. No one has the balls to do anything different anymore.
Just play it safe and rake in the revenue. They don't give a (BLEEP) about the listener at all.
Yes, you call up a lame number and record your thoughts, but they are deleted immediately.
And who are these people that do these promo's saying "Everyone is talking about Atlanta's newest radio station"???They are pre-recorded.







>
 
Chill

Its called imaging. Its a projection of the the station wants it image to me. It doesn't have to be true. In this case, the station wants everyone to think that everyone is talking about the station...that way...it'll generate buzz around town. The River doesn't have an image to work off of like All The Hits or Atlanta's News Weather and Traffic station...so its building an image up.

In theory.

Hammering in the fact that a certain station was voted #1 blah blah blah doesn't make it true, but it reinforces the fact that they're a work station and maybe...just maybe someone new will tune in.
 
> > OK, I was a fan at first. But 971 The River is on a stuck
> > mode. It is amazing how quickly a new format on a station
> > that was doing nothing with Jamz, is now going to fail
> > miserably, AGAIN.
> > Why in the HELL don't these programmer's see the light?
> >
> > SHAKE UP THE PLAYLIST. PLEASE.
> >
> > This is what a classic rock/oldies station should sound
> > like. It is Capital Gold out of London. Here is a link
> > --Listen- Is is amazing.
> >
> http://rope.icgo.fimc.net/static>
> web/onair_players/onair_capitalgold/player/onair_goldIE.html
>
> What a shame.And they always seem to do it with Fleetwood
> Mac.I remember when Z93 drove me away with the endless
> Fleetwood Mac.
> >
> The New Mix 105.7....enough said!!!
 
> You can go your own way. I want to hear the classic hits.
> Not some alternative hipster in the know nonsense.
>

We've all heard rumors about a possible landslide for The River, but don't break the chain...it'll be just fine.
 
You know you're in trouble when they lead off their tv commercials with the live version of The Eagles' "Hotel California." I understand that they need to play hits, but what i think previous posters are arguing, and what I agree with, is that they can Hotel California or Fleetwood Mac's The Chain once in awhile, no problem. Just mix in some deeper stuff from some of these artists. Like "The Last Resort" from the Eagles, or "After the Glitter Fades" from the Mac's Stevie Nicks.

I'm really digging XM Radio channel 40 right now. It is called Deep tracks, and it plays the stuff that never got played on radio from Springsteen, U2, Police, Clapton, etc.
 
> You know you're in trouble when they lead off their tv
> commercials with the live version of The Eagles' "Hotel
> California." I understand that they need to play hits, but
> what i think previous posters are arguing, and what I agree
> with, is that they can Hotel California or Fleetwood Mac's
> The Chain once in awhile, no problem. Just mix in some
> deeper stuff from some of these artists. Like "The Last
> Resort" from the Eagles, or "After the Glitter Fades" from
> the Mac's Stevie Nicks.
>
> I'm really digging XM Radio channel 40 right now. It is
> called Deep tracks, and it plays the stuff that never got
> played on radio from Springsteen, U2, Police, Clapton, etc.
>
did you really say "digging???
 
> Just mix in some deeper stuff from some of these artists. Like "The Last
> Resort" from the Eagles, or "After the Glitter Fades" from the Mac's Stevie > Nicks.
>
> I'm really digging XM Radio channel 40 right now. It is
> called Deep tracks, and it plays the stuff that never got
> played on radio from Springsteen, U2, Police, Clapton, etc.
>


Those of you who keep talking about satellite radio are missing the point entirely. You’re comparing apples with oranges. Satellite radio and terrestrial radio are two entirely different business models. Satellite is a national service that makes most of its money by selling a product (music/talk) to a buyer (subscribers). Radio is a local service that makes its money by selling a product (listeners) to a buyer (advertisers). For a radio station to succeed, it has to attract a reasonably large number of those listeners (preferably listeners in an attractive demo) who will, in turn, attract advertisers. A station playing deep album cuts would never work, because it would never attract more than a small handful of listeners in any given city. Satellite, on the other hand, has the entire nation from which to pull those listeners…and it has a lot of other similar “niche” formats that do the same. While the number of people (paying subscribers) listening to any one of those niche formats probably isn’t very impressive, the satellite service has the benefit of bundling enough of those different niche formats together to make it all worthwhile. Radio’s only hope is to offer something satellite can’t: localism. Local personalities, local traffic, local news, local phone calls about events that are interesting to Atlanta listeners but not necessarily to a national audience, local references to local “characters,” local, local, local! Radio CEO’s (most of who never worked in radio) missed that point when they started embracing the whole voice-tracking concept.
Now, they’re falling all over themselves to switch to “Jack” type formats, as if that could possibly compete with the 150 different channels offered by XM. They didn’t understand the problem, then. And, sadly, they still don’t have a clue.
 
Clark,

I fully understand the difference between satellite and local commercial radio. My point was that a radio station could take the best of both worlds and be successful. Combine more deeper tracks and new stuff from classic artists with less (but not no) classic hits, add localism, and there is a formula that I think would work well. In any format, not just classic rock. I only use classic rock because we now have three stations (Dave, 96 and River) all of whom seem to be going for a piece of that market, but don't seem to be able to distinguish themselves from each other. Dave probably comes closest, but there is still much room for improvement.
 
> > OK, I was a fan at first. But 971 The River is on a stuck
> > mode. It is amazing how quickly a new format on a station
> > that was doing nothing with Jamz, is now going to fail
> > miserably, AGAIN.
> > Why in the HELL don't these programmer's see the light?
> >
> > SHAKE UP THE PLAYLIST. PLEASE.
> >
> > This is what a classic rock/oldies station should sound
> > like. It is Capital Gold out of London. Here is a link
> > --Listen- Is is amazing.
> >
> http://rope.icgo.fimc.net/static>
> web/onair_players/onair_capitalgold/player/onair_goldIE.html
>
> What a shame.And they always seem to do it with Fleetwood
> Mac.I remember when Z93 drove me away with the endless
> Fleetwood Mac.
> >
>
I couldn't listen to Cool 105.7 because it seemed like every third or fourth song was by Fleetwood Mac.
 
My suggestion would be not in deeper tracks but longer playlists of hits. There is a large number of hits in the classic rock genre that are not being played. 300-500 song playlist just cause too much burnout and repetition. I worked an oldies station once with a playlist of 2000 songs. That may have been carrying it to the extreme in the other direction but we always kept it sounding different which is hard to do in oldies.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom