• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

I dont get it with ogl

Thanks to Diamond Jim Nettleton for Reply No. 35 on this thread. He said just about everything I would have said in replying to Mr. RF (No. 34), and a few things that wouldn't have occurred to me!

When will owners stop listening to self-styled "consultants" who don't know what they're talking about?

Of course, it's just the pervasive "play-it-safe" culture of corporate radio at work here. The consolidation engendered by the 1996 Telecom Act not only consolidated ownership; it also exacerbated the"group-think" tendencies of the industry!
 
So it's safe to assume, then , that all these posts about the ideal station and the cookie cutter owners aside, No one can name a library based station like Oldies or classic Rock with a 1000+ song playlist and a ratings story.Because there isn't one.
Blame the owners, blame consultants, blame deregulation, blame the sales staff.Blame, blame,blame.
Reality check: the stations with the huge playlists don't win in the ratings because their regular listeners want to hear the hits.
And the technicality of calling only currents "hits" is just plain in error, and if that's a serious position, laughable. Hits are the songs of a format that sold lots of copies.Some exceptions are on Classic Rock where artist affinity sometimes makes songs " big favorites" that were never hits in terms of sales. But to say only currents are hits is not true. Quite the opposite: many currents are not hits at all but mildly popular pop music that will not make the cut into the gold based formats of that genre of music.
I remain unwavered from all this interesting dialogue. I have witnessed over and over, stations that determine who is listening to their station, ask them what they expect from the station, do their best to select the best representation of the types of songs the listeners directed them to compile, then ask those listeners to score those songs, play the top testing ones with secondary testing ones in for "flavor or spice", then rotate them with care and a good ear...the merging of science and art,and the stations improve in the ratings. I have witnessed this over and over in many different formats.
I share many of your opinions about what Wall Street has done to change radio. It's not all bad, but many of your points are valid. Just not this one. Listeners want the hits and listening to crispy radio guys who think they know what " the peeps" want in leiu of research is a one way ticket to bad ratings and formatic uncertainty.
 
In Northern NJ there is an oldies station WMTR-AM. I know their playlist is close to a thousand songs. I also know it is programmed from inside. This station, with virtually no marketing budget is doing great in the ratings and with advertisers. Yes, it can work, but you need to have faith in your programmer and give him or her the time and tools necessary to make it happen.
 
Thanks, Sack, for reminding me about WMTR.

The station scored a 6.5 12+ share in the Morristown, NJ Fall 2005 book (Morristown is a sub-market within the New York metro). At that time, WMTR was the beneficiary of CBS’s ill-advised decision to flip WCBS-FM in NYC to “Jack-FM.”

WMTR had been playing almost all pre-1964 material (but with a few mid-late-Sixties things) for about 18 months, in response to WCBS-FM’s having dropped virtually all pre-British Invasion music. When CBS flipped to “Jack-FM” in June of 2005, WMTR added B.I. artists and increased the Motown, Four Seasons and Beach Boys presence.

The fact that WMTR slipped to a 2.7 in the Spring ’06 book is attributable not so much to a decline in the appeal of its format as to two other factors: (1) On Nov. 1, 2005, half-way through the Fall book, Greater Media dropped the simulcast on a daytimer on 1170., further limiting the reach of the programming by confining it to a single marginal AM signal. (2) WMTR continued to run specialty programs on the weekend, and sports programming, neither of which would appeal to their primary Oldies audience. (This is, after all, Greater Media. Shades of the nearly contemporaneous WPEN debacle!)

So there, MrRF, is the best example of a success story we can find for an Oldies station that is at least somewhat worthy of the name Oldies. And it’s the best a success by default, only because of the opinionated ignorance of the corporate radio establishment – and that of their "consultants," who are about as intellectually respectable as astrologers.

So I’ll continue to “blame the owners, blame consultants, blame deregulation, blame the sales staff,” and all the usual suspects, because they ARE responsible for the sorry state of radio today. Cume and TSL are in free fall, and the industry is in trouble.

Jim Nettleton is an excellent air talent, but I almost think radio needs him more acutely in an executive capacity than on the air. The suits running radio today are out of touch with what their audiences – and their advertisers – really need. They’re putting out a useless product that people are abandoning in droves. How useless? And how incompetent are they? It’s almost as if the map-making business were controlled by members of the Flat Earth Society!
 
It's great to hear that an AM in market #108 does well. What is comforting is that they stay committed to local programming,community involvement and live jocks. However, the real issue they face is that like WPEN as standards, a strong 12+ number often doesn't convert to 25-54 which is where the ad community requires the RADIO DOLLARS AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET to be priced for. It's the free market system at work. The market shifted and radio followed the money to survive. The best buggy whip company still went out of business when people bought cars.
 
An intriguing part of your commentary on radio is that you say management is out of touch with what the audience wants and that's why people are abandoning it in droves. Funny, when I and others stress the importance of audience research and how some companies invest in it to find out what their core P 1 and P 2 listeners want from the station, you criticize that as listening to the consultants.Yet I have seen well done research result in increased ratings more times that not. The very stations that get bashed the most here seem to have higher 25-54 numbers than they had in years gone by...and it seems as if they continue to do research.
So what you really want is a station programmed to your choices alone. That station exists...it's called an IPOD. Why don't you do your bloodpressure a favor and get one. Commercial radio will survive just fine without your angered comments from the sidelines, mr. skeptic.
 
MrRF, respectfully, a couple of counter-points. You challenge us to name one station that supports our position. Let's turn it around. YOU name examples of when/where a GENUINE LONG HAUL effort was made to follow the formatics we've outlined and show us stations that FINANCIALLY failed. There aren't any because no one has tried it long enough with the necessary resources to compete. And don't give me CC, Citadel, or Cumulus stations with nearly unlimited resources that blew these independent thinking stations out of the water with strong 25-54 numbers. The example I'll give you is this: If Bill Gates decided to go into the gas station business in the state of PA and priced his gas at exactly 1/3 of what Mobil, Citgo, BP, Exxon, and all the other companies charge for gas in PA, what do you think would happen? Gates would have the dollars to take on those losses and dry up the competition, causing the other gas stations to pack up and go home. The same thing has taken place with radio. If the conglomerates would choose to use our formatics with their stations, the agencies would have no choice but to buy stations with our formats and the reverse would be true.
 
All I can add to this is Jim is and was the best in the business bar none. CAU-FM was the prototype to test the format and try it out, when it proved successful other CBS FM affiliates jumped on Solid Gold Radio. I do believe Jim made the tapes from his Cherry Hill residence, although WCBS-FM started a year later they did not have future gold and did play many doo wop and oh wow tunes, they had a deep playlist and hired the old WABC jocks. I could go on and on about this fantastic station, I was 18 when it launched and saw billboards on trucks driving around center city advertising the new station. I never knew what oldies were and never heard the music before the Beatles and this was an unique experience, I still remember She Say by the Diamonds which I never heard of before but loved it the first time I heard it. How can anyone dispute the tunes Jim picked out, Triangle, I Cant Stop, High on a Hill, Dont Bet Money Honey, Lucky Old Sun-Frankie Lane, which I mentioned early on in this thread, the library had to be over 2000 titles rotating on and on. For the record, when that moron Keating flipped CAU-FM, they had a 4.2, Disco 98 never reached higher than 2.0 and hovered at 1.0 the first few years. PEN never carried the ball after the demise of Golden 98. If the format was never destroyed CAU-FM would of been in the top 5 constantly. What they are now is nothing like the oldies station that Jim created, honestly they stink, I never listened to them more than a few seconds since their birth. I think Jim added future gold because WIFI was not a good FM top 40 station, lousy signal, compressed stereo effect, other markets had good FM's big signals good sound but WIFI was a joke....I cannot understand why WFIL went under, usually the new FM top 40's destroyed the heritage AM top 40's in most markets, but WIFI was really never a threat.
 
Diamond Jim said:
A couple of points regarding play list size: yes, there are stations doing well with large play lists – for instance, those consulted by E. Alvin Davis, one of the only consultants in the business who actually knows what he’s doing and is not just good at corporate speak. In the 70s, my play list at CAU-FM was in excess of 1400 titles. Now before someone jumps in with a maniacal look on his face and gleefully shouts ‘See – I told you that’s why they tanked’ – let me elaborate on that whole situation. We had done extremely well for an FM of the period. WPEN had success when they went oldies for a couple of reasons – first, any new ball game in town usually gets initial attention – staying power is the key, of course. In our case then, we had virtually no promotional budget and WPEN came in with a blitz. It is true also, as was noted in a couple of the posts that FM was still the stepchild in those days. The fact is that after the initial book in which they beat us, we bounced back well and probably would have continued that trend had not Jim Keating wanted to be the hippest GM on the block and go disco.

I did extensive research at that time and found that most of the listeners gained by WPEN had come from sources other than CAU-FM – clear evidence that there were many oldies listeners out there that we hadn’t reached with our meager promotional efforts - they didn't know about us.

Ironically, but not unusual for this business, we had all been assured just two weeks before the format change at CAU-FM by none other than Bob Cole, then VP of CBS, that, and I quote, “If you think CBS is going to let Greater Media come in here and take our oldies format from us, you're very mistaken.” This had been precipitated by me, after telling Jim Keating that our staff deserved better than to have their lives played with in the wake of the very credible rumors circulating at that time.

So play list size had nothing to do with all that. Now, as regards the WPEN recent oldies debacle – all of us were thoroughly deceived by that situation. Initially, the station manager at the time wanted me to program it – we had several meetings prior to the format change, in which I pointed out to them what was needed for an AM with a crappy signal to actually attract listeners for a music format, especially in this town. It didn’t work out, of course, and WPEN wound up playing roughly 40% of what WOGL was playing, a sure recipe for disaster. They also, of course, refused to give up their weekend programming and other albatrosses they suffered with. So it became a part time oldies station saddled with a miserable signal and inadequate internal vision - then again, maybe they really wanted to go sports all along.

Let’s go back to the original point – contributors say, ‘show me a station…….’ – does it ever occur to those folk that the reason the number of stations with large play lists are few is because management today falls victim to the propaganda and doesn’t even try? They are told by the ever-present consultants everything from A to Z and happily accept the advice because – GOD FORBID they should make an independent decision – then, they might have to take responsibility for it. Much easier to point at the research and say, ‘see, they told me – I was only following their advice – it’s not my fault.’ As I mentioned in a previous post, if you are an adult over 40 who has even only casually listened to radio during your life and you can honestly tell me that you only like 250-300 songs, then I submit you are severely audio-challenged, or have spent most of your adult life in a Tibetan Monastery.

Oldies stations settle on such absurdly tight play lists as a result of self-serving research – as we all know, hooks are played for an audience of less than absorbed folk, who must respond in 6 seconds or less not only to whether they like the song (if they can even recognize it) but how often they’d like to hear it. They are asked to make both a qualitative and quantitative analysis that many of us could not make, in the snap of a finger. And the list of songs they’re exposed to gets shorter and shorter – so research fulfills its own prophecy. Ever attend one of those sessions and observed that as time goes on, participant’s answers become more hasty and less disciplined? They just want to get out of there and collect their checks. Yet we base all of our programming decisions on this. Curious, isn't it, that with all that research going on, every station isn't #1?

And once again – those people that continually say that stations like WOGL are successful because they ‘play the hits’ – please – as mentioned before, they were hits – they aren’t now.

And also again – a few years back, when I was still at WOGL and it actually played a good, varied list and actually did legitimate specialty shows, not contrived imitations, the station had double digit numbers on the weekend, was #1 weekends and #2 during the week – a position they haven’t remotely approached since with the ‘successful’ formula of pounding the same, tired songs over and over again. Entertainment is all about unpredictability – you must have that surprise factor, the ‘Oh wow’, if you will, to keep interest. Only Cozy Morley could succeed doing the same act for decades. Most comedians need a variety of material to keep an audience’s attention.

One thing I’ve learned over more than 40 years of doing clubs, dances, and special events of all kinds around the Delaware Valley is that the musical tastes of the people in this region are wide and deep. And I know they aren’t satisfied with what they hear on today’s stale, stultified radio stations. As E. Alvin Davis says, financial success of an oldies station isn’t a format problem, it’s a sales problem. Find people who can actually sell, and not be content merely to accept an order, and the problem could go away. After all, they’re dealing with a demographic that has a commanding amount of expendable income – but today’s sales folk don’t seem to think that someone 55-60 actually buys cars, appliances, clothes, goes on trips and stays at hotels, eats out at restaurants, etc. And today’s merchants are believing their pitch that all advertising MUST be directed to 20 and 30 somethings.

Just one more thing about extensive play lists – RadioPhillyStyle.com, with virtually no publicity push to date, has listeners in 90 cities in the US and 34 countries worldwide. Not one has complained of hearing too many songs.

Have a good night, all.

Jim Nettleton
.............although i did not expect to see jim post on here (my own name for him has always been "gentleman jim") ... i am thrilled to read a quality post from a quality guy ... phew , did i ever like his version of the top 20 countdown on wogl , as well as jim years and years back .... i simply wish that those in charge of playlists would really really please please read his posting on here .... "oh wow" songs are that way because of playlists ..... i now listen primarily to low budget , low power , poorly programmed jersey stations to hear a wider variety .... a few years back , wogl stopped playing 1962 and older songs , to boot , which even made their playlists even narrower :mad:
 
Also, respectfully, GW, you are asking me to do the impossible. When the question was posted, "name a ratings successful station that plays songs over 40 years old from a playlist of over 1000 records"...,It was a sincere inquiry.
I personally have scoured the top 50 markets for a work project at another time and place in my life and I couldn"t find one.The few I found worth examining, one call to the people in charge and they lamented that they can't crack the top 10 25-54 and are getting clobbered in the agencies.
I,too, like these fantastic old songs. I,too love the depth.
But I have sat thru countless research projects and saw them not test well WITH REGULAR LISTENERS. I contend that success today requires a nurturing of the art part of our business: rotations that sound great, air talent that is live,local and engaged, together with creative stationality merged with the science- researching what the listeners want and then giving it to them. Programming stations to radio insiders is suicide.
 
Two factors I ask you to consider:
1. as recent as 10 years ago, 20% of the buys were targeting adults 35-64. That allowed Oldies, Classic Rock, Classical,News Talk, etc to have business they can price aggressively for.Today that same business targets 25-54. Actual 35-64 buys are now less than 1 in 20.
Same with 18-34 business. It used to be 25-35% of the availed business. Today it's less than 15%. Even then half the business was 25-54...but the other half was not. It allowed for niche formats to not just survive but thrive.

2. With the changing times came big business and Wall street. Now an FM Station in Philadelphia is worth between 50 and 100 million dollars.It's easy to say take risks, try new things...but if it was your 50 to 100 million you might require a more certain return in this uncertain business.

Times have changed.I,too fondly remember Solid Gold WCAU FM. But it's 4.2 then was a smaller number than a 4.2 today. There are 10 more stations in the market with move-ins and all that has occurred in the last 25 years.But 100 % is still 100 % and that's what share is. More stations and the same listening levels equals lower ratings.
Plus the 30 to 55 year olds that LOVED this music and type of presentation are now 50 to 75.And no longer the target of the age discriminatory ad community.The free market system at work. The people who buy this stuff tell those that sell it what they want, Those that sell it adapt to the wants of those that buy.FREE MARKET SYSTEM at work. Like it or not, this is why things are as they are.
So, let's use this board to remember, or propose , but lets reduce the anger and accept that "The times, they are a' changin ".....and find ways to adapt and still please most without self destructing and becoming irrelevant.
 
My apologies RF if you took my post to vent anger. Not my intent. I capitalized the things I did to emphasize. IMO, your last post was a little more accurate towards the oldies format. A similar crash happened with "Music Of Your Life" formats of the 80's and early 90's. Yet, if that were totally true, Harry Connick Jr. 7 Michael Buble wouldn't have successful careers. However, I don't think your examples prove anything against deeper playlists.
A totally different animal I'm aware, and in a very small town in Central PA, but I built an extremely successful night at an area night spot playing a very deep oldies format in the late 80's early 90's. To make a very long story short. I was asked to play danceable oldies (50's & 60's at the time) on a Thursday night. The club was the #1 night spot in the area, drawing all kinds of numbers with a top 40 dance format on Friday & Saturdays, and a top 40 under 21 night on Sundays. I came in playing a deep playlist of danceable motown, soul, doo-wop, etc., with 3 hours simulcast on the area AM. The club wasn't drawing flies on Thursdays. In 6 months I had the highest grossing night of the week. My primary crowd was about 35-60 but I also had plenty of 21-35 as well. The other nights had 2-3 times the number of patrons I had, but my crowd was outspending them. The night died down in the mid 90's for various reasons, not the least of which was the declining oldies format.
I then moved on to another club and developed a night playing late 70's through early 90's dance & rock, with plenty of "oh wow" danceable titles and no currents. That too was a huge success, drawing crowds that were about 21-45. The key in both of these nights was not playing the tired same old same olds. No Electric Slide, no Y.MC.A., no Holiday, etc. The funny thing was in both of these examples, I started off playing these deeper playlists right from the start. The patrons didn't have instant recognition of all the songs, but with regular attendance and playing them, they then re-learned and re-recognized the songs. I even took NON-RADIO, NON-HIT songs and made them "hits" at these clubs through repetition. Granted there weren't many of these titles, but it got to the point where the area dominant FM would come to me asking who/what/where these songs were coming from and they added them to their playlists! In turn I had the local record store (The Wall-at that time), starting to stock some of these titles because people were asking for them.
I think we may need to agree to just disagree at this point. We've both raised valid arguments in our own defense of our positions. Maybe in reality, neither one of us is totally right and it will depend upon each individual circumstance.
 
To CSP: I'd be interested to know what NJ-based Oldies stations you meant in Reply # 48. To the best of my knowledge, WVLT (92.1, Vineland) is the only one receivable in much of the Phila. market, and they're not Oldies full time. After 7 PM (and much of the weekend), they air, to recycle a phrase I used on the 50s-60s board, "a congeries of brokered garbage" (though there are a couple of bright spots; and of course, Jerry Blavat's 5-7 PM slot is brokered, too). And WNJC (1360 AM, Washington Twp., Gloucester County) is brokered all the time, though there are some brokered Oldies shows. But their signal is really bad!

So what stations did you mean, and what is it that you particularly don't like?

To RunWithScissors: I'm glad to see you're still following this thread. We're in agreement here.

Finally, to MrRF: An I-Pod? No thank you. If I put in all the music, where are the surprises? (Besides, I don't care how popular they are, the sound stinks. Data compression and real high fidelity are incompatible! But then, I'm an old school, analog audiophile.)

But on the other hand, I was very encouraged to see some common ground in your last post (Reply # 50), when you said that you, too, enjoyed "Solid Gold" WCAU-FM. And you pointed out some of the shifts in advertiser demands in the past few years -- though I was already aware of those changes.

But then you called this the "FREE MARKET SYSTEM at work" (caps yours). I beg to differ. The concentration in the business is a direct result of the 1996 Telecom Act, which allows unconscionable concentration. The fact my car can do 90 doesn’t mean that I should be allowed to do 90 on a public street or highway. To do so would be irresponsible, even if it were legal. But with that Act, Congresslet the big owners disregard the public interest with the recklessness of speeders!

Programmers are doing what they're doing because their bosses demand that they play it safe. Nobody ever got fired for doing the safe, orthodox thing. Look at the history of 95.7 in Philly after Greater Media acquired it. Three failed formats that "research" predicted to be winners (yes, Jammin' Oldies -- excuse me, Jammin' Gold, since CC, as the successor to Chancellor, still owns the original, now-worthless name -- had a brief, flash-in-the-pan success, and gave WOGL a run for its money for two books; but it soon succumbed to failure, owing largely to its absurdly small playlist -- which also makes another of my points!) before finding a modicum of success with "Jack" -- oops! another slip -- "Ben FM." And nobody in management got fired over Mix, Max or Jammin' (though they did change consultants.)

And don't condescend to me about citing only 12+ figures for WMTR (Reply #43). Since I'm no longer working in radio or in advertising (Thank God!) and no longer have any close friends in those fields, that's the only kind of data I can get my hands on. Of course, that wild swing from 6.5 to 2.7 suggests that these samples are inadequate, and that audience measurement is a pseudo-science, like reading the entrails of a goose (or, as I said of consultants’ work, like astrology).

I guess that covers everything for now.

But I'm not really hostile. And please don't worry about my blood pressure (Reply #45). Two weeks ago, it was 110/66, so I must be doing something right!
 
One other small point to add to the above, well written post. Just because we can/can't show you a deep playlist station with a ratings story, doesn't mean one can/can't exist. A silly example: Just because CNN or Fox News hasn't shown me footage from the desert of an alien from outer space, doesn't mean they absolutely don't or couldn't exist.
 
i look at it like this, 98.1 is the most listened to oldies station in the country, so they must be doing something right.
 
Well, perhaps yes, eyg2181, if you mean sheer numbers of listeners, since Philly is a relatively large market. But WOGL didn't have the highest SHARE of any Oldies station in the country in the Summer '06 book. WMJI/Cleveland had a [EDIT] share, and KOOL/Phoenix had a [EDIT], and both were number one in [EDIT] in their markets. And KCMO-FM/Kansas City was number 2 in [EDIT] there with a [EDIT] share. If WOGL has the largest number of listeners, that's only because it's in a larger market, and because there are no full-powered FM Oldies stations in the five still larger markets (New York, L.A., Chicago, San Francisco and Dallas-Fort Worth).



[EDIT-post truncated because originating material is copyprotected. Unauthorized use of copyrighted content is in violation of Radio-Info's TOS.]
 
radioskeptic said:
there are no full-powered FM Oldies stations in the five still larger markets (New York, L.A., Chicago, San Francisco and Dallas-Fort Worth).



[EDIT-post truncated because originating material is copyprotected. Unauthorized use of copyrighted content is in violation of Radio-Info's TOS.]

Los Angeles still has K-Earth 101 (KRTH)
 
I guess you are right , we agree on quite a few things. First about Oldies stations ratings: LA has an FM Oldies station KRTH and while it is lower ranked than WOGL and has a smaller share, it actually is the #1 Oldies station in Americas because of cume.Over one million I believe. WMJI in Cleveland has the top share of them all, but it's a large market(23?) not a major top 10, but you are on to a good one. I reasearched this one over the years. Local, Big,market leading Morning show, local local, and about a 400 song playlist. Also on the right track with KOOL , Phoenix. A bit wider, 500 songs, still some early pre beatles but no 50s. Lower rank 25-54( 10th or 11th?) but Phoenix is one of the few towns that 64 is still targeted by the ad folks as the # 1 place the well off retire.That takes us to WOGL, top 5 25-54 and 12+ and 35-64. Kind of wide playlist and still successful specialty shows.They have the highest AQH share in the top 10 markets.
About deregulation...there we agree almost fully. Not better for the listeners or The Journeymen Broadcasters ...only the stock holders.
However, when you say no one ever got fired for playing it safe, there we do not agree. Because with playing it safe( Depends how you define safe, I suppose)remember that average equals blah equals mediocrirty which leads to out the door in radio. They are just the slow deaths we don't hear so much about.
Also interestingly, the big successful Oldies stations we've mentioned are owned by CBS and Majic in Cleveland by Clear Channel. Also Boston, Denver,and Detroit by CBS.So they are doing somethings in the format right.
Anyway this has been a healthy thread, but I remain convinced that, although innovative programming can overcome almost everything, it's the buying community that took advantage of deregulation, critical mass and used CPP as a tool, to keep rates low and choke radio. Wall street didn;t help , by not allowing big expensive battles which we all used to enjoy, but it's still more 25-54 than anything, caused by the buying community and tolerated by short term thinking greedy radio sellers" going for share" instead of rate.
 
I agree that the 25-54 target demo shift by the ad people 20 years ago was the biggest cause of all this. If it was pure salesmanship, stations would shoot for 12+numbers with old or young and not have to worry. They now have to tweek their programming to a slice of the population and that limits many formats. Odds are the 25-54 age directed advertising in a top 10 market like this is 90% of the total.
 
There may be some hopeful signs on the horizon - NBC News did a piece the other night on the fact that ad agencies seem at last to be realizing that the older demos have some real money to spend and are worth going after - what a revelation, huh? Also a good article in Radio Ink along the same lines.

By the way, I'm not sure what 'crispy radio guys' means, but I'm betting it's not good. And after nearly 50 years in the business and more than two decades in management and having programmed a total of 33 radio stations in 4 different formats successfully, I think I have a modicum of understanding about audiences. Research is a tool and an imperfect one. Without experienced, intelligent interpretation, it's as useless as a flamethrower in hell. We need that human element more than ever today.

On another point, what I was expressing was not blame - it was a summation of facts. The large playlist at WCAU-FM was the list I inherited when I took over there in 1972 - a list that the station had already been successful with for 2 years of strictly automated broadcasting. And the fact of the matter is that, after WPEN's initial brief surge, normalcy was returning and WCAU-FM was climbing rapidly back on top, large playlist and all, shortly before the disco ball started spinning. Sorry, that was probably bordering on pontificating and Mom always warned me about that.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom