then why are they played tirelessly in shopping centers, and plenty of other public places as well? I was at the Lancaster, PA shopping outlets last week and had to stand outside for about 30 minutes while waiting for an important call since I couldn't get cell reception inside the stores. So I had nothing to do but listen carefully to the music played over the loudspeakers...I remember the newest song I heard in that 30 minute period was "A Sign of the Times" by Petula Clark (1966)...everything else was actually older!!! It was mostly those cheesy late 50s/early 60s "carefree" songs that remind you of the summer or beach or whatever. And guess what else I observed in that short time period...on multiple occasions, I saw teenagers or young adults (both male and female) singing along to the songs as they walked by me: they actually knew the words, and they seemed to really get a kick out of singing aloud and making a fool of themselves. These people were definitely younger than 25, so common sense tells us that if they enjoyed this music, that means people in their 30s/40/early 50s are even MORE likely to enjoy these old songs. By the way, even though I liked this music, it was a tiny bit too old for my taste...I'm 27 and my "sweet spot" for music is roughly between 1965-1985. I'm just trying to make a point here...
What I'm trying to say is that this notion of "oldies are dead" or "only 55+ individuals listen to oldies on a regular basis" is complete BS. If it were true, then why is it that the many of few oldies stations that do exist today are at or close to the #1 rated spot in their market? And even though oldies are virtually non-existent on the radio, why are they still played in public places if no one likes them???
I'm sure I'll get bashed for this, but I have a theory that the eradication of old music from the radio is a part of a conspiracy to keep the (modern) music industry alive. Oldies stations began dropping like flies in the early 2000s, and it seems way too coincidental that mainstream music began to lose its catchy tunes, rich musical backing, etc. around that same time period. And another "coincidence" is that the only songs you hear on the radio today from the 80s and 90s (besides the smash hits which are already popular and will be popular no matter what) are the ones that generally don't have catchy tunes, rich instruments, or general "universal appeal". So it seems to me like there are efforts to keep the "musically sound" old stuff out of the limelight as much as possible in order to improve the chances of promoting today's stuff, which is not as appealing in a musical sense. Now let me point out: I am in no way insulting today's artists or even today's music...I am just pointing out my observation that there seems to be very little focus on catchy tunes or rich instrumental backing, for instance, in today's music. I find this ironic, because I consider these two things to be two of the most important factors in what makes a "good song". Of course, this whole theory is just a speculation on my part, so what does everyone else think?
What I'm trying to say is that this notion of "oldies are dead" or "only 55+ individuals listen to oldies on a regular basis" is complete BS. If it were true, then why is it that the many of few oldies stations that do exist today are at or close to the #1 rated spot in their market? And even though oldies are virtually non-existent on the radio, why are they still played in public places if no one likes them???
I'm sure I'll get bashed for this, but I have a theory that the eradication of old music from the radio is a part of a conspiracy to keep the (modern) music industry alive. Oldies stations began dropping like flies in the early 2000s, and it seems way too coincidental that mainstream music began to lose its catchy tunes, rich musical backing, etc. around that same time period. And another "coincidence" is that the only songs you hear on the radio today from the 80s and 90s (besides the smash hits which are already popular and will be popular no matter what) are the ones that generally don't have catchy tunes, rich instruments, or general "universal appeal". So it seems to me like there are efforts to keep the "musically sound" old stuff out of the limelight as much as possible in order to improve the chances of promoting today's stuff, which is not as appealing in a musical sense. Now let me point out: I am in no way insulting today's artists or even today's music...I am just pointing out my observation that there seems to be very little focus on catchy tunes or rich instrumental backing, for instance, in today's music. I find this ironic, because I consider these two things to be two of the most important factors in what makes a "good song". Of course, this whole theory is just a speculation on my part, so what does everyone else think?