Move!
I thought they were going to tell us to go online. Which you can.
I thought they were going to tell us to go online. Which you can.
Move!
I thought they were going to tell us to go online. Which you can.
Depends on what the online service offers. I'm in metro Phoenix, and I just started subscribing to YouTube TV. While I've been happy with the service, it does omit some OTA channels, specifically PBS (KAET/8), TBN (KPAZ/21) and CW (KASW/61). It also does not air any of the LPTV/Class A stations or any subchannels at all. Channel 8 is supposedly on the way within the next few months, and I don't care about 21, but I've heard nothing about 61. I know it's going away to become an ATSC 3.0 test bed, but the CW as a network has not been addressed AFAIK.
Perhaps they don't want to pay the additional music royalties required by online broadcasting.
Perhaps they don't want to pay the additional music royalties required by online broadcasting.
>>Perhaps they don't want to pay the additional music royalties required by online broadcasting.
Bob Bittner's WJIB Cambridge MA, like his stations in Maine,do not streamcast for cost
reasons and also fundraise despite having commercial licenses. (He refuses to run ads!) Two of his stations do have FM translators.I have pointed out to listeners that the only way to get WJIB, or WJTO Bath ME, on their smartphones is to live within range of the FM translators and use an FM radio app if their phone has an FM chip. Not an online stream but it'll get the signal IF you're in range.
No, they are online. I think it was a joke.Perhaps they don't want to pay the additional music royalties required by online broadcasting.
Or via an online SDR, if there are any in those stations' coverage areas. Speaking of which, why don't the operators of such websites have to pay royalties on all the music played on radio stations that their users stream?
Since music heard on AM isn't tagged, I don't know how the music industry would even charge for it. Aside from that, generally 1 to 4 users can operate the receiver at all times, I'm thinking "for experimental and scientific purposes only" would keep the rent-seekers at bay.
Any answer to my question a few posts back about the legality of online SDRs on sites like GlobalTuners being used to listen to stations playing music? Is it up to the owner of the website or the owner of the individual receiver being used to do the bookkeeping and pay for the music?
Most of the SDRs at GlobalTuners receive 88-108 and I often find them tuned to local FM stations when they're free for others to use. That's when I start scanning the shortwave bands on them. So plenty of FM music is being listened to, sometimes for extended periods.