M
Mike1
Guest
UPN and The WB are merging into one network in the fall. The new network will be called CW.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
E
EnergyAZ
Guest
> UPN and The WB are merging into one network in the fall. The
> new network will be called CW.
>
They are?!?!?!?! OMG!! THATS SOOO SHOCKING!!!
Dude.. read a little bit down on the page.
> new network will be called CW.
>
They are?!?!?!?! OMG!! THATS SOOO SHOCKING!!!
Dude.. read a little bit down on the page.
> > UPN and The WB are merging into one network in the fall.
> The
> > new network will be called CW.
> >
>
> They are?!?!?!?! OMG!! THATS SOOO SHOCKING!!!
>
> Dude.. read a little bit down on the page.
>
Or better yet, the moderator "sticky" at the top of the page, posted a good 18 hours or so before the post starting this useless thread.
Peace.<P ID="signature">______________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-- Samuel Langhorne Clemens
</P>
> The
> > new network will be called CW.
> >
>
> They are?!?!?!?! OMG!! THATS SOOO SHOCKING!!!
>
> Dude.. read a little bit down on the page.
>
Or better yet, the moderator "sticky" at the top of the page, posted a good 18 hours or so before the post starting this useless thread.
Peace.<P ID="signature">______________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
-- Samuel Langhorne Clemens
</P>
sarcasm
One entry found for sarcasm.
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: 'sär-"ka-z&m
Function: noun
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwar&s- to cut
1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain <tired of continual sarcasms>
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm <this is no time to indulge in sarcasm>
synonym see WIT
One entry found for sarcasm.
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: 'sär-"ka-z&m
Function: noun
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwar&s- to cut
1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain <tired of continual sarcasms>
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm <this is no time to indulge in sarcasm>
synonym see WIT
> sarcasm
---------
I don't think there was any sarcasm here. It was probably a case of glancing at the page without scrolling down, and making a quick post.
But maybe I'm wrong.<P ID="signature">______________
From WNBC-TV New York this is Liiiiive at Fiiiiive!</P>
---------
I don't think there was any sarcasm here. It was probably a case of glancing at the page without scrolling down, and making a quick post.
But maybe I'm wrong.<P ID="signature">______________
From WNBC-TV New York this is Liiiiive at Fiiiiive!</P>
> > > UPN and The WB are merging into one network in the fall.
>
> > The
> > > new network will be called CW.
> > >
> >
> > They are?!?!?!?! OMG!! THATS SOOO SHOCKING!!!
> >
> > Dude.. read a little bit down on the page.
> >
> Or better yet, the moderator "sticky" at the top of the
> page, posted a good 18 hours or so before the post starting
> this useless thread.
>
> Peace.
Actually he does have point. Yesterday when I logged in I went all the way down and found no mention of what "CW" was? I however, got a notice from Broadcasting and Cable Magazine and looked there.
It's just one of the "quirks" of having a board where the newest posts don't rise to the top.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Once I figured out the meaning of life....Then I forgot to write it down.</P>
>
> > The
> > > new network will be called CW.
> > >
> >
> > They are?!?!?!?! OMG!! THATS SOOO SHOCKING!!!
> >
> > Dude.. read a little bit down on the page.
> >
> Or better yet, the moderator "sticky" at the top of the
> page, posted a good 18 hours or so before the post starting
> this useless thread.
>
> Peace.
Actually he does have point. Yesterday when I logged in I went all the way down and found no mention of what "CW" was? I however, got a notice from Broadcasting and Cable Magazine and looked there.
It's just one of the "quirks" of having a board where the newest posts don't rise to the top.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Once I figured out the meaning of life....Then I forgot to write it down.</P>
K
KMRichards
Guest
> > Or better yet, the moderator "sticky" at the top of the
> > page, posted a good 18 hours or so before the post
> starting
> > this useless thread.
> >
> > Peace.
>
> Actually he does have point. Yesterday when I logged in I
> went all the way down and found no mention of what "CW" was?
However, since my sticky clearly said -- in all caps -- "read this before posting on the UPN/WB merger", there is really no excuse.
I am, however, going to leave this thread here as you all managed to humiliate the poster fairly well, and perhaps it will be a lesson to read EVERYTHING, including moderator stickys, before jumping in.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> > page, posted a good 18 hours or so before the post
> starting
> > this useless thread.
> >
> > Peace.
>
> Actually he does have point. Yesterday when I logged in I
> went all the way down and found no mention of what "CW" was?
However, since my sticky clearly said -- in all caps -- "read this before posting on the UPN/WB merger", there is really no excuse.
I am, however, going to leave this thread here as you all managed to humiliate the poster fairly well, and perhaps it will be a lesson to read EVERYTHING, including moderator stickys, before jumping in.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
- Status