What I don't understand is that though the etymology of "ho" is a derivative of "whore", in Ebonics, "ho" refers to any woman, not just women of loose morals. If you ever listened to rap music, you've heard African-American men use the term "ho" to apply to all women.
At most, Imus showed some insenstivity in using an Ebonics word. And if the critcism was over his description over the texture of African-American hair, that might not have been the most elegant way to describe it, but it was merely an accurate description.
Between the Ebonics noun and the description of the textrure of their hair, what he called them was simply "curly-haired women". That's hardly something to get upset about.
It strikes me as counterproductive for members of a minority group to fight to have their language recognized as a real and valid language instead of merely sloppy slang, then to turn around and chastise someone for actually using words from that language. Ebonics either is or isn't a language. If it is, Imus did nothing wrong. It is isn't, someone needs to stop trying to convince everyone that it is.