Guess HE told ME, eh?
Radio_Realist said:
you missed the point...You might think calling for people to repeat jokes about this situation is a pleasant way to change the subject from anything serious. Instead, you're simply opening the door for more arguing. The near term impact of this whole deal will be very negative for entertaining content on news/talk radio for some time to come.
I'm not missing your point, but I'm not making mine.
You might disagree, but I think Imus DESERVES ridicule.
Being offended by what he's done, I regard any sort of verbal "caning" as appropriate.
Bill Maher had Dan Rather on last week; and he-and-other-guest-panelists made 2 points about comedy.
a.) Too often, news media get too cozy with sources.
Comedians' barbs serve a useful headline purpose...keeping important stories high-profile.
b.) In the new media world, monologues have become a useful way for people-who-don't-habitually-read-a-newspaper-every-day to KNOW what's up.
And the unintended consequence of this whole Imus fiasco, its silver lining, is that it has served to tee-up a valuable national conversation about race; and, secondarily, gender. You regard it as "arguing;" I hear what-folks-are-saying-now as "dialogue."
Several hundred years before Jay Leno or TV were born, court jesters played as-important a role.
In another Marx Brothers classic, Groucho sang, "I'm Against It!"
Good morning from Las Vegas, and NAB2007,
HC
www.HollandCooke.com