• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Imus: Paradigm Shift In Talk Radio and Beyond?

C

Casablanca

Guest
Wonder if the firing of Imus indicates a paradigm shift in talk radio and beyond. Whether the right wing or the left wing for that matter likes it or not talk radio will never be the same after the firing of Don Imus.
Until sometime in the 1950's it was acceptable public theatre to have minstrels shows with white men an sometimes even black men in "black face". We would be shocked if we were to see that today on the stage or television. Some extremists are even offended by the play/movie "Showboat" because it depicts this.

So it might be with talk radio. Shock-talk is now dead or dying. It has become an albatross aroung corporate's neck. Although they will deny it commercial talk radio will pull back to the center. Locally, management might let the likes of Jay Severin and Howie Carr continue with their personal attack rants ie. "AXE the Governor" and "Towel Heads" but it will become an unwritten line that they and others like them will cross at their peril.

The question remains however if those same standards will apply to radio stations that play gangsta rap and the like - even in an edited form. Shouldn't the same standards apply to them, the record producers and the "artists" who produce them.

If B*I *C *H and HO and the like are unacceptable on talk they should be unacceptable across the radio dial.

You can't have a double standard . . . or can you.

Heard some rappers say their language is "artistic license" well couldn't the same be said for Don Imus. They are both acts - just on different stages.

Still, the age of tabloid and personal attack talk radio is coming to a deserved end. Will the same be said for the racial vulgarity of some rap? IMHO less likely as long as corporate and the advertisers are still making money. Plus, they know that those who listen do not have the interest or experience to demand a change. They are sheeple ready to be sheared for the almighty dollar.
 
Casablanca, this is, in my opinion, big business stifling the radio industry just as Big Business ruined the record biz.

Thankfully Jerry Williams had that perfect window in time to do his thing, as Charles Laquidara did.

Talents like that can't emerge in the current climate unless it is on the web.

http://www.radioparadise.com does a good job breaking through on the web, thus, it is my example.

Imus is a product of big business and is being victimized because his masters don't want to know.

It's kind of like Karl Rove & Scooter Libby...oops, gotta throw someone overboard, it might as well be
Scooter Imus
 
This is the pendulum swinging too far the other way. It is hilarious that 'free speech' stops short of being absolute in many people's minds. The same people who want to lynch Imus are the same people who will fight to the death to burn the flag as an expression of 'free speech.' Sharpton and Jackson, the latest 'magic negros' based on the LA Times characterization of Obama being one, become the poster children of 'what's permissible' while they themselves can only credit 'race-baiting' for creating who they are. How laughable that Sharpton and Jackson--racists extraordinaire--are seen as gate-keepers of what you can and can't say. Hilarious, too, that their 'next' targets are all conservatives. Hmmmmmmmm. Funny how that works!

Happily, they are seen for what they are. As Liberals, they want to push along the Fairness Doctrine and reclaim talk radio for their own. The market won't let that happen, because if people really wanted to listen to a bunch of angry, dour, whiny Liberals on the radio (which is what they all are, anyway), then Air America would be sailing along and Rush Limbaugh wouldn't have 20 million listeners. Propped up for long enough by donations from Liberal elites, Air America has happily expired...unable to sustain itself the way NORMAL radio networks do.
 
Spoken like a true apologist for the angry, whiny conservatives who lost an election big time

Faux Pas from ChrisNH:

"As Liberals, they want to push along the Fairness Doctrine and reclaim talk radio for their own. The market won't let that happen, because if people really wanted to listen to a bunch of angry, dour, whiny Liberals on the radio (which is what they all are, anyway), "

The Conservatives stifle Free Speech. NPR is factual and gets bigger numbers than Plush Limbaugh and
Hannity - the big screamer. Those numbers aren't reflected in the Arbitrons as NPR is not "commercial" radio per se. Do we have to say this a thousand times every time you Republican children need a spanking?
 
LOL at Liberal mind-numbed robots like you: 'NPR is factual....' What a crock. They are king of the Liberal media hill. All you Liberal media lovers do is spout on and on about how the things you listen to are 'factual' while everything else is 'propaganda.' Mind-numbed ROBOT. That's all you are. Yessssss Master...Katie Couric is a goddess. Yessssss Master...all truth comes only from ABC, CBS and NBC. Yessssss Master. The New York Times and The Boston Globe are factual and true in all that they say. Yesssss Master.

You're utterly comical.
 
Chris from NH you are perpetrating all that is wrong with shock-talk radio today. Forget your predisposition to see the world as conservative or liberal. The real world is only Dollars and Cents and that is that only thing that makes sense.

Radio will pull to the middle because that is where the money will be.
 
Varulven said:
NPR is factual and gets bigger numbers than Plush Limbaugh and
Hannity - the big screamer. Those numbers aren't reflected in the Arbitrons as NPR is not "commercial" radio per se.

how does this make any sense? ::)
 
Do we have to say this a thousand times every time you Republican children need a spanking?

I thought all of you good liberals are opposed to spanking? That's why most children are out of control.
 
how does this make any sense?

It doesn't.

Though I do have to agree that "Car Talk" is factual, and balanced. In fact, NPR has more factual and unbiased shows on the air than any other network or syndication service. All of these NPR shows are factual and unbiased, and that's only a partial list:

All Songs Considered
The Annoying Music Show
Broadway Revisited
A Chef's Table
Echoes
Jazz Profiles
JazzSet with Dee Dee Bridgewater
Marian McPartland's Piano Jazz
A Prairie Home Companion (usually)
Sacred Classics
Splendid Table
Talking Plants
World of Opera
You Bet Your Garden

It's only their newscasts that are biased.
 
Many of NPR's talk show are just dry and boring. They should leave the talk shows to the profesionals. There was a major brouha over our local NPR affiliate dumping most of the classical music in favor of the snooze fest talk. The Saturday Night Live spoof of NPR was spot on. I always thought SNL was exagerating the bad talk show sketch, but after listening to NPR for a while I realized that SNL had spoofed NPR pretty good.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom