This has been bugging me for a while. During news and magazine type programming on several networks the producers will not run the proper aspect ratio of the clips they are showing. for instance when showing a tape originally shot in SD 4:3 they will crop the top and bottom off to make 16x9. This will only work only if the original is of reasonably good quality and the cameras are far enough back so it doesn't chop off the tops of heads. Another thing they do is take a 4:3 clip and stretch it to fit a 16x9 frame. This results in a bloated image that makes everyone look fat. I've been noticing a lot of this lately. ABC seems to be worse about this during the news broadcasts and shows such as "Primetime" CBS has also been doing this. Another bad habit is when watching a segment or program shot in 4:3, they will take a 16x9 clip and instead of letterboxing it they will squeeze it into the 4:3 frame resulting in making everyone look skinny. This behavior is driving me crazy. You can't make HD out of something that was shot in SD. You can't fool everyone. But judging how most of my friends watch SD programming stretched out on their HD sets I'm not surprised.
NBC however usually adds sidebars to there SD live and tape preserving the proper ratio during nightly news. The stretching and squeezing needs to stop. Cropping is sometimes acceptable (as in some PBS documentaries) but only on film and high quality video and only if it can be done without cutting off too much of important parts of the footage.
what do you think of this practice?
NBC however usually adds sidebars to there SD live and tape preserving the proper ratio during nightly news. The stretching and squeezing needs to stop. Cropping is sometimes acceptable (as in some PBS documentaries) but only on film and high quality video and only if it can be done without cutting off too much of important parts of the footage.
what do you think of this practice?