-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Indie is success for Entravision
- Thread starter leethalweapon
- Start date
A
archer1043
Guest
> Could they be here for a while yet?
God, I hope so. With way too much time on my hands, I've been listening to it a lot the last few days. I get my education on new music, along with lots of classic alternative I haven't heard in years, and in the middle of all that, here comes "Crazy Train" by Ozzy.
Too cool for words.
God, I hope so. With way too much time on my hands, I've been listening to it a lot the last few days. I get my education on new music, along with lots of classic alternative I haven't heard in years, and in the middle of all that, here comes "Crazy Train" by Ozzy.
Too cool for words.
Re: Why Did You Start Another Thread?
> > Could they be here for a while yet?
>
> God, I hope so. With way too much time on my hands, I've
> been listening to it a lot the last few days. I get my
> education on new music, along with lots of classic
> alternative I haven't heard in years, and in the middle of
> all that, here comes "Crazy Train" by Ozzy.
>
> Too cool for words.
>
I posted something exactly about this a few threads down - you should've added to my thread instead of starting a new one. Mr. Richards will be along in a moment...
> > Could they be here for a while yet?
>
> God, I hope so. With way too much time on my hands, I've
> been listening to it a lot the last few days. I get my
> education on new music, along with lots of classic
> alternative I haven't heard in years, and in the middle of
> all that, here comes "Crazy Train" by Ozzy.
>
> Too cool for words.
>
I posted something exactly about this a few threads down - you should've added to my thread instead of starting a new one. Mr. Richards will be along in a moment...
K
KMRichards
Guest
Re: Why Did You Start Another Thread?
> I posted something exactly about this a few threads down -
> you should've added to my thread instead of starting a new
> one. Mr. Richards will be along in a moment...
Thank you for the introduction.
From now on, threads that essentially duplicate recent threads will be summarily deleted, even if there are replies before I get to it.
If you cannot be bothered to read the existing threads before starting new ones, I will not be bothered to give you the courtesy of letting your threads stay.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> I posted something exactly about this a few threads down -
> you should've added to my thread instead of starting a new
> one. Mr. Richards will be along in a moment...
Thank you for the introduction.
From now on, threads that essentially duplicate recent threads will be summarily deleted, even if there are replies before I get to it.
If you cannot be bothered to read the existing threads before starting new ones, I will not be bothered to give you the courtesy of letting your threads stay.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
B
BACKnUSSR
Guest
Re: Why Did You Start Another Thread?
> > I posted something exactly about this a few threads down -
>
> > you should've added to my thread instead of starting a new
>
> > one. Mr. Richards will be along in a moment...
>
> Thank you for the introduction.
>
> From now on, threads that essentially duplicate recent
> threads will be summarily deleted, even if there are replies
> before I get to it.
>
> If you cannot be bothered to read the existing threads
> before starting new ones, I will not be bothered to give you
> the courtesy of letting your threads stay.
>
Yes....whats the use of having a thread where people actually have an interest and reply, when there's a rule that can be enforced to stifle it??
> > I posted something exactly about this a few threads down -
>
> > you should've added to my thread instead of starting a new
>
> > one. Mr. Richards will be along in a moment...
>
> Thank you for the introduction.
>
> From now on, threads that essentially duplicate recent
> threads will be summarily deleted, even if there are replies
> before I get to it.
>
> If you cannot be bothered to read the existing threads
> before starting new ones, I will not be bothered to give you
> the courtesy of letting your threads stay.
>
Yes....whats the use of having a thread where people actually have an interest and reply, when there's a rule that can be enforced to stifle it??
K
KMRichards
Guest
Re: Why Did You Start Another Thread?
> Yes....whats the use of having a thread where people
> actually have an interest and reply, when there's a rule
> that can be enforced to stifle it??
A better question, if you think about it, is what's the use of making people look at two threads with identical content, when they could read one thread and have all the comments together?
I realize you have an anti-K.M. mindset, but do try to step away and look at it from that perspective. <P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> Yes....whats the use of having a thread where people
> actually have an interest and reply, when there's a rule
> that can be enforced to stifle it??
A better question, if you think about it, is what's the use of making people look at two threads with identical content, when they could read one thread and have all the comments together?
I realize you have an anti-K.M. mindset, but do try to step away and look at it from that perspective. <P ID="signature">______________
</P>
K
KMRichards
Guest
I'd call it "guarded optimism" ...
Inside Radio reported on that conference call and carried Ulloa's quotes about being "quite pleased" with Indie and the "strong performance" in revenues ... but ...
Here is a quote from Ulloa which Inside Radio reported and which R&R didn't.
But if things go south he says “then we take a look at exiting the market” like they did with their sale of San Francisco’s KBRG (100.3) and KLOK (1170) to Univision.
And now you know ... the REST of the story.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
Inside Radio reported on that conference call and carried Ulloa's quotes about being "quite pleased" with Indie and the "strong performance" in revenues ... but ...
Here is a quote from Ulloa which Inside Radio reported and which R&R didn't.
But if things go south he says “then we take a look at exiting the market” like they did with their sale of San Francisco’s KBRG (100.3) and KLOK (1170) to Univision.
And now you know ... the REST of the story.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
S
scoot
Guest
Ditto on that. We are lucky to have it, and it's really a miracle it's still here.
Now all we need is a station that plays an even wider selection of intelligently selected music, a la Chicago's WXRT but with more of an edge.
>
> Too cool for words.
>
Now all we need is a station that plays an even wider selection of intelligently selected music, a la Chicago's WXRT but with more of an edge.
>
> Too cool for words.
>
Re: Why Did You Start Another Thread?
But I thought everyone was supposed to be reading all of the threads? I'm confused...
> A better question, if you think about it, is what's the use
> of making people look at two threads with identical content,
> when they could read one thread and have all the comments
> together?
>
> I realize you have an anti-K.M. mindset, but do try to step
> away and look at it from that perspective.
>
> > Yes....whats the use of having a thread where people
> > actually have an interest and reply, when there's a rule
> > that can be enforced to stifle it??
>
But I thought everyone was supposed to be reading all of the threads? I'm confused...
> A better question, if you think about it, is what's the use
> of making people look at two threads with identical content,
> when they could read one thread and have all the comments
> together?
>
> I realize you have an anti-K.M. mindset, but do try to step
> away and look at it from that perspective.
>
> > Yes....whats the use of having a thread where people
> > actually have an interest and reply, when there's a rule
> > that can be enforced to stifle it??
>
- Status
- This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.