• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Interesting Citadel news

I realize that everything is for sale for the right price, but this is an interesting admission. In this mornings Radio-Info news:

"Where are the buyers? Lots and lots and lots of stations for sale…One dealmaker rings me up to say “Do you realize that Citadel alone has stations up for sale that it says have $50 million in cash flow? They’d be willing to part with Buffalo and Syracuse and Knoxville and Binghamton and other markets."
 
Low Growth

I can't seem to find the article you referenced, but I can't say that I'm surprised.

EVERYBODY is for sale for the right price. Citadel Buffalo's not in a "growth market". Although Buffalo was consistently their #1 or #2 biller, they're now just another medium market since the ABC merger. Advertising revenue is not growing in Buffalo at the same rate it's growing in other markets, and Citadel has slipped from its #1 position in market billing.

Blame for Citadel Buffalo's slip can be directly attributed to corporate. They've lost some very good sales and management talent to other clusters in the market. They've also made some corporate programming decisions (Opie & Anthony, taking WHTT AC) that aren't turning out to be as profitable as expected.

With all that said, the Citadel cluster in Buffalo is making lots of money. The profit margin is very good. If it gets sold, it won't go for peanuts. I'm not sure how many buyers would be interested because the growth potential is limited, and it's running relatively lean compared to other markets. That means that the cost of acquisition will come directly out of profits, not from "future growth" or "synergies".

When you treat radio stations like real estate, you value "growth potential" instead of profits.
 
O&A aren't doing poorly, and S&R are killing in afternoons, and 97s morning are very strong...

A competitor to the AC race brings in new opportunities for sales, whereas having another male oriented station in the Citadel cluster was just recycling old clients around the dial...

Citadel Buffalo is working good strategy if you ask me, from a sales perspective. And let's face it, Listener A doesn't analyze radio programming the way we do...
 
Re: Low Growth

SirRoxalot said:
I can't seem to find the article you referenced, but I can't say that I'm surprised.

Here's the entire piece from Tom Taylor at Radio-Info so you can read the story in context.


Lots and lots and lots of stations for sale…
One dealmaker rings me up to say “Do you realize that Citadel alone has stations up for sale that it says have $50 million in cash flow? They’d be willing to part with Buffalo and Syracuse and Knoxville and Binghamton and other markets. And CBS has AMs in some very big markets listed for sale. Then there are all the Clear Channel stations from the GoodRadio deal that are being re-marketed.” But supply-and-demand is out of whack right now, he says: not enough buyers for an unprecedented number of stations and clusters on the market. When the supply outstrips demand, that’s usually going to depress prices – as we see in the housing market in most U.S. areas. Though it turns out that the mid-December portrait that SNL Kagan paints isn’t all that gloomy –
 
It's got to be interesting over at Citadel these days. Effectively, I suspect they're running two separate companies - the former ABC stations in the big markets (NY, LA, Chicago, DC, Dallas, San Francisco, Detroit) and the small- and medium-market stations that were the old Citadel. And as companies such as Clear Channel and CBS have learned to their chagrin, there aren't THAT many economies of scale that can be passed down the chain to smaller markets to justify the attention they require, vis-a-vis the revenue they produce. (On a hunch, I'd guess that the NY and LA former ABC clusters probably produce as much annual revenue as all of "old Citadel" did put together.)

So just as CBS got out of Buffalo and Rochester, and Clear Channel out of Utica and, eventually, Binghamton and probably Syracuse and Rochester eventually, too, I guess I'm not surprised to see Citadel thinking of exiting our territory...if, as Tom Taylor so ably notes, they can find buyers. (Anybody wanna buy WRMM?)
 
Topping Out

If Citadel follows the Clear Channel model and dumps medium and small markets, it's not because of profits, it's because of growth potential.

The big money guys are interested in the "buy low, sell high" paradigm. They want stations that will increase in value. The fact that those stations make a tidy profit in the meantime is of less interest than that they increase in value. They don't want to be owner/operators, they want to be traders. When the market hits their predicted "high", they want to sell and take the profit.

Many radio stations have reached full value. In fact, we're seeing Clear Channel sell some stations for less than they paid for them (i.e. Utica/Rome). People buying in now had better be prepared to operate stations for a long time - long enough to pay off the financing. With the challenges that radio has in its future, steady double-digit increases in revenue are not likely.
 
Let's go back to September 2006, and this thread which first appeared around the time Regent was buying the CBS Buffalo cluster. To the credit of the many posters here, some salient observations appeared in that thread.

So here we are again, speculating about another potential sale. This time Citadel alledgedly (reportedly, possibly, theoretically) is planning to spin its medium and smaller markets.

Some questions to consider:

Keep in mind that ABC-Disney shareholders own 52% of the company.

Where's the buyer's financing going to come from? Sure, there's trillions of dollars of investment money floating around out there, but those dollars won't come cheap.

Who the hell wants to buy into Buffalo? No offense, Buffalo posters. The same cold question applies to Rochester.

Regent bought into Buffalo for $125 million and damn near lost the company. They had to sell their Watertown cluster to pacify the hostile investors who eventually gained two seats on Regent's board of directors. This should serve as a warning to other companies of Regent's size considering properties in Buffalo.

There is no major company that wants to get into the medium and small medium market mud pit at this time. CBS is bailing, Clear Channel is bailing. Entercom can't find (at least at this time and at the desired price) buyers for three FM's 67 miles down the pike in Rochester. There's a reason for this.

The economy is precarious at best. Less than three weeks remain in 2007 and at this writing, the first quarter of 2008 looks downright threatening.

You'd think with the glut of available stations, the rules of supply and demand would kick into high gear. But the cost of money is prohibitive, even with the Fed considering another .5 cut in the overnight lending fund rate, which affects the prime rate. Oh, and there's that messy sub-prime lending fiasco which seems to be getting more rancid with each passing day.

Here's the part that should scare the snot out of sales guys, on-air people, programmers, sales managers and even cluster managers at Citadel stations that might be spun. Staff cuts.

Look no further than what's happened at Regent over the last few months. WJYE was "right-sized." There were staff cuts and re-assignments throughout the cluster. Keep in mind that Regent owns Jack, and regardless of what Bob1370 or any other educated radio pro thinks, Jack gets competitive shares without one live body on the staff.

Regent runs the syndicated Tom Joyner show on WBLK and consistently ranks top 3, often first, Persons 25-54 in morning drive.

WYRK, even with a soft book in Summer 2007, is a runaway train with no direct competitor.

Regent is spinning its sole AM property for $1.3 million, ostensibly to shore-up its financial position not for future purchases, but for survival.

These considerations don't portend a rosey future, just more stress and mediocrity.

From my perspective, the timing isn't right for a sell off, so Citadel can be expected to hold on to their medium market stations for at least another year. They're not going to sell properties at less than full market price.

-9-
 
Element9 said:
Who the hell wants to buy into Buffalo? No offense, Buffalo posters. The same cold question applies to Rochester.

No offense taken. That's what this story is all about.

There's over-leveraged broadcasters in just about every market looking to get TOP DOLLAR for unwanted stations. All of the big guys are going private, merging, or selling-off all but the non-essential stations. What businessperson from the second-tier of broadcasting groups (or lower) would want to roll the dice and buy stations that are essentially overpriced, knowing that your people are going to have to "squeeze blood from a stone" to come close to making the purchase worthwhile.

My guess is that if anyone does make a run at a Buffalo or Rochester it will be a privately owned company with lots of dry powder or a new entity. A publicly traded radio group might have to be nuts to buy a cluster like these in an economy like this.
 
This supports my all-too-long screed above:

Inside Radio said:
More brokers admit they're walking from business.Inside Radio hears from several who thought they were alone, but after our story Tuesday detailing how some brokers are opting not to take listings, they realize they're not. One longtime broker says he feels he has a "moral obligation to sell the property" once he takes a listing. That can be tough, especially when there are few buyers.

As I said, who the heck wants to buy into Buffalo and Rochester, given the economics of the markets. New York State has two economies: One being the burroughs of New York, the other being all areas north of Duchess County.
 
Well, I guess it's official now - posted on http://www.radio-info.com/news/:

"CEO Farid Suleman's talked about this process for months, but may have taken a more concrete step by hiring Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank to market stations from the portfolio - from $75 million to perhaps $175 million of them, over the next 12 to 24 months."
 
Hmmm... $75 to $175 million... in the overall scheme of things, that's not a lot of money for Farid & Friends.

Consider this: Regent handed over $125M to CBS for four Class B's and an AM in Buffalo. Comparitively speaking, what's the Citadel Buffalo cluster worth?" Three Class B FM's, two AM's. Given the present economy? $100M? $115? OK, go nuts and say $125M.

Even by rough calculation, this would leave "only" $50M to $75M to be gained by the sale of other Citadel properties.

Before we go into speculative frenzy mode and drive Citadel employees who read this board into aircheck-resume' mode, it's more likely that Citadel is interested in selling clusters in markets like Binghamton and Syracuse and some of their really small market clusters than selling the Buffalo cluster.

Just sayin'...

-9-
 
Read Citadel's Sales Proposal

I believe you have misinterpreted Citadel's sales plan, Element 9. Citadel is said to be considering selling stations (and presumably clusters) valued at from $75 million to $175 million. Here's the quote from Inside Radio:

"The company says when the portfolio trimming is through they will have sold stations worth $75 to $175 million..."

Your overall analysis is interesting, but it's based on an inaccurate interpretation of Citadel's statement. The proposal is not to sell a total of $175 million worth of properties, but to sell many properties whose values are between $75 million and $175 million (each.) In other words, you're wrong. The Buffalo cluster may very well be part of the spinoff plan. Not saying it is, but it seems to fall within the parameters set forth by Citadel to Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank.
 
Misinterpretation

Andrew, I believe that you're the one misinterpreting Citadel's statement.

According to the statement that was issued, which can be found on their website:

"The Company expects to generate between $75 to $175 million in gross sale proceeds over the next 12 to 24 months including certain stations that are required to be divested as a result of the ABC Radio transaction."

That would make Element 9's analysis valid. Considering that there are several stations that became Citadel property as part of the ABC deal that must be divested, I don't see how the Buffalo cluster could be included in the announced number.

Of course, that doesn't mean that Citadel won't sell properties that they perceive as "underperforming", or that have limited growth potential. Until the ABC merger, Buffalo was their #1 or #2 money-maker. Now, Buffalo is just another medium market in the rust belt.
 
There seems to be a disparity between the statement on the Citadel website and the way Inside Radio worded the story. It certainly isn't as clear as the wording on the Citadel website. After reading the Citadel statement, I believe Element 9 had it right. My apologies. It wasn't my intent to antagonize.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom