1
1q2w3e
Guest
Re: Irony of pro-IBOC posters
Horse hockey!
The other board (which this board forces to remain nameless) has plenty of discussion pro and con. They just like to keep the discussion to a point to where it does not degrade to the childish name callign that happens here. Some of you that got booted off of it were asked many times to provide real data. You would jsut cause trouble (just like here) just to see your names on a web page. You really dont bring anything constructive to the conversation.
The only self promotion came from the likes of YOU. Promoting YOUR blogs, and mis informed web pages.
I ask you, have you worked with HD Radio? Are you familiar with the technical aspects of HD Radio? (I knwo the answer already... this is a re hash... it just keeps going round and round and round with no true resolution).
Again, I dont care if HD succeeds or not. When it is all said and done I still have a job. But I cannot stand back and have misinformation being spewed out. See that is part of my job as an engineer. To provide the good and the bad so that we as broadcasters can make educated BUSINESS decisions. I am not tilted either way. If I thought that HD Radio was going to be bad for radio, it is my job to say so. I get paid either way. Can you say the same?
SUPERCASTER said:An HD Radio discussion board where no discussion is permitted, only promotional hype and favorable fabrications are permitted?rbrucecarter5 said:It seems my last post on this topic was deemed unacceptable because I do not tow the company line. But I do have a suggestion: break the board into two boards - a pro-IBOC board and an anti-IBOC board. The moderators police it - moving OT posts to the appropriate place - and both sides leave each other alone.
As long as it is one board called HD radio - both pro and con posts are on topic, leading to contentious arguments unworthy of professionals.
The other board is that way. Boared and full of deceptive self promotion and advertising.
Horse hockey!
The other board (which this board forces to remain nameless) has plenty of discussion pro and con. They just like to keep the discussion to a point to where it does not degrade to the childish name callign that happens here. Some of you that got booted off of it were asked many times to provide real data. You would jsut cause trouble (just like here) just to see your names on a web page. You really dont bring anything constructive to the conversation.
The only self promotion came from the likes of YOU. Promoting YOUR blogs, and mis informed web pages.
I ask you, have you worked with HD Radio? Are you familiar with the technical aspects of HD Radio? (I knwo the answer already... this is a re hash... it just keeps going round and round and round with no true resolution).
Again, I dont care if HD succeeds or not. When it is all said and done I still have a job. But I cannot stand back and have misinformation being spewed out. See that is part of my job as an engineer. To provide the good and the bad so that we as broadcasters can make educated BUSINESS decisions. I am not tilted either way. If I thought that HD Radio was going to be bad for radio, it is my job to say so. I get paid either way. Can you say the same?