Let's make a topic out of this. It usually comes up as a side item. Is the very thing itself, commercial Christian radio wrong? Is non-commercial, listener supported radio the only correct way to do Christian radio?
K-Tel said:Does it really matter what avenue you use as long as you're bringing people to Christ?
MikefromDelaware said:I believe part of the problem, both with Christian radio, televangelists, and many large churches is they've expanded so much beyond possibly what the Lord might have desired. As a result, as in all
I have long said, "sometimes, the best thing we can do is be sure we don't give the unbeliever another excuse."Denise Pagano said:...Christians need to be fed, but I believe that we need to show non-Christians that we aren't "boring" or that we can't do "real" radio.
MikefromDelaware said:I've sat in numerous church's that wanted to expand to have larger facility and have taken out gigantic mortgages that they could NOT afford based on the tithes and offerings coming. The Pastor says we'll just do this as a step of faith. Then after a few months go by and he's behind in the mortgage payment, then the Pastor starts beating his people over the head to give sacrfically to make ends meet. Some how that does not seem like how the Lord provides. That appears, to my spirit, like a pastor who was building his own kingdom, "all for the glory of God", but was God consulted in the decision? In too many cases the answer is NO. If the Lord says to do something, he'll also provide the way for it to work.
Hmmm.... I've never had this problem at a church, and rarely does that large a decision rest solely on the pastor.
But I take umbridge with the idea that "If the Lord Says Do Something. He'll also provide the way for it to work." I think of men like the apostles who were sent to the slaughter after Jesus returned to heaven. Would the naysayers at Peter's crucifixion have said maybe God didn't want him to go as far as he did?!? What is working? Maybe God needed that Church to be destroyed because he wanted to do something better? Just because something fails in the short term doesn't mean that all is lost. Look at a guy like William Wilberforce, his attempts to end Slavery in Britian failed for over 30 years before something happened. Are you saying if he had more faith it would have only taken 10 years? Or how about the years Moses and the Hebrew people spent wandering around in the wilderness? I'd like to think I'd probably one of the guys who would have suggested they high tail it back to Egypt. I would have been wrong.
The bible says "All things work together for good, for them that love God and are called according to his purpose," but just because you can't see the good immediatly doesn't mean God isn't working.
Asking for money is not wrong. We as believers are to be generous, but we also are to be good steward's of what God has given us. I don't feel led to give to a televangelist who's driving a limo, wearing a Rolex, Italian loafers, a Brooks Brothers' suit, his wife is wrapped in minks and diamonds. I'm not saying they should live in poverty, but they also shouldn't be living like the rich and famous either. Billy Graham is a good example. His ministry decides what his salary is, not him. He obviously gets a decent salary, but he's not living the lavish life that you see in some of the other very wealthy televangelist's who never seem to have enough money.
While I think it prudent to suggest that televangelist is probably the wrong word here, and you have to listen to a man to know his fruits. Billy Graham lives in a gated community, as does James Dobson, and many other men who make their living preaching the gospel. The first Christian Abraham was also very wealthy. It's not wrong to be weathly but it's also silly to think that every ministry needs to be poor. It takes money, sometimes Millions of dollars to run a ministry well and it shouldn't be up to the figureheads of the organization to foot the bill. Asking for money is not wrong... it how one uses that money that could be wrong.
The bottom line that Beverly Hills needs Jesus just as much as South Central and each place requires a different kind of person to do the job. If you find yourself at church's that keep getting into financial problems that may be God telling you to give more or go somewhere else. Nobody wants a mudslinger in the midst, if your not happy in your church go somwhere else!?!?! It seems pretty obvious from your comments that you probably need a smaller church with smaller goals. Do me a favor though before you leave your next church get involved. Go to some business meetings and don't talk, just listen. Take part in a mission project. You'll realize that sometimes you've got it wrong.